I certainly hope that starts happening. The alternative is COVID 10 years from now will be just as bad and widespread as it is today. We cannot kill this thing with less than damn near everyone cooperating by being vaccinated. “Conscientious objectors” need to be shot. With vaccine or with bullets; they get to choose.
I’ll go out on a limb and agree. A few, very few people may deserve a medical exemption, but truly independent physicians need to identify and confirm that exemption, unlike the ‘cuz I’m the parent and I say so’ school vax exemptions have worked out. One or two people in a hundred with genuine inability to be vaccinated is doable for our population. They then need to be educated and supported in rigorously using other mitigation systems to protect themselves and the rest of us.
This is getting debate-y. Don’t want to be guilty of junior modding here, but see post #119 for the intent of this thread.
I do think the issues surrounding the implementation of vaccine passports are well worth debating. If someone wants to start a thread that, it I’ll be only to happy to join in.
Not until it is available to everyone, anyway. Or if they have a legitimate medical exemption.
But, I’ve been spending tons of money on labor and resources this last year to keep things open while doing my best to prevent spread within my workplace. Once there is an alternative, then I’m not going to keep any employees that insist on continuing to be a risk to other employees, clients, or to myself.
Geez, what is the deal with this? Is this some kind of code language that is just between friends, or does this guy really mean that objectors should be dealt with violently?
And that’s not to mention the blatant misinformation that covid will be unchecked for ten years running without vaccines.
One person at work (London, UK) was asked to move to a different team becasue he was needed their. He objected saying he was BAME and we werren’t taking this into account.
When asked if he had the vaccine he said ‘no, I am still doing my research’.
We have followed every rule and every precaution, eg: bubbles, masks, distancing, no customers on site, staff shielding, no pressure on staff, accommodating staff, etc. We also test staff twice a week, but he refuses the test.
This is his right, but he has to understand that we have a rights and duties relating to our work too.
Such situations will be repeated countrywide (UK and USA) and will impact companies, economy, and work patterns of everyone.
NY Times: “ Younger Military Personnel Reject Vaccine, in Warning for Commanders and the Nation.
About one-third of the troops have declined to take the vaccine. Many say they worry the vaccines are unsafe or were developed too quickly. Others want a sense of independence, even in uniform.”
“…Roughly one-third of troops on active duty or in the National Guard have declined to take the vaccine, military officials recently told Congress. In some places, such as Fort Bragg, N.C., the nation’s largest military installation, acceptance rates are below 50 percent.”
One (an emergency medical worker!) refusenik “added that some of her colleagues had told her they would rather separate from the military than take the vaccine should it become mandatory.”
THESE are the selfish, suggestible morons who are supposedly in charge of “protecting” our country?
(Sorry if that wording is better suited for the Pit.)
Well, I wasn’t expecting test refusers. Is there any indication why he refuses the tests? Financial maybe - fear of being sent home if he tests positive?