Forgive me in advance for my difficulties with reading comprehension, I am white and thus inbred and cannot see, read or write very well. But I am trying. But let me get this straight, you say that in order for the accusation of you being a supporter of “black supremacy” to have validity, the accuser must be able to show evidence of you actually saying that you were in fact a “black supremacist” or that you explicitly supported the actual killing, murder or deaths of white people?
Because you obviously have not said such things, at least not on this board (to my knowledge). Buuuut, not one single poster who may or may not be white has said that they are in fact a “white supremacist” or has explicitly endorsed the killing, murder or deaths of black people either.
Yet nonetheless you seem to paint all of those you perceive to be white as “white supremacists” or supporters of white supremacist ideology while giving yourself a pass. You’ve got to realize how weak this makes any of your arguments come off. A middle-schooler wouldn’t be so careless.
And you have long since given clear evidence that you have the knowledge and mental acuity far surpassing that of a 7th grader. So it’s just more evidence supporting what I’ve been saying since your early threads: you are a very effective troll. The way you’ll seem to sabotage your own arguments with easy to recognize examples of blazen bigotry of one form or another. At just the right moments. You will rile people up by saying just the right things in order to provoke them to say emotion-fueled things, that you can then calmy say prove your point.
Why do you post here? Will you answer that? Prolly not. If you had any desire to open minds or enlightment people who previously did not know life included such lows, you wouldn’t end every sentence with y’all hoes or post exclusively in the Pit or drop ridiculously obvious stinkbombs in the middle of an otherwise good discussion or any of the myriad trollish tactics you employ here. From a certain perspective I have to be impressed. You are very good at what you do. But what you do is a stupid fucking thing.
The account in question rolls that way often enough that I’ve wondered if its purpose is to test a bot program. Key words elicit one list of insults, another set of key words elicits another list of insults, but points raised are never addressed.
Someone has to program bots, of course. Boards like this are probably one of the best places to do it, because you have a largish number of people who come back to the same threads more than once (unlike Twitter, where it’s all ephemeral, and conversational gambits rarely receive meaningful feedback). To program effectively you need to see how the programmed responses are received, and message boards are ideal for the purpose.
Of course I don’t know who may be working on bot programs and who might not. But non-responsiveness of the degree we see with the “Huey” account is what we might expect.
That’s another notable aspect of the HF account: the consistency with which it is blatantly unjust.
This feature is one that raises the possibility that the account is primarily intended to smear the reputations of people of color (by providing “evidence” that people of color—given that it’s claimed the account is written by a person of color—aren’t capable of being fair or just).
Yes, unless a paycheck is changing hands, it seems that the time devoted to this activity by the writer of the HF account is hard to explain. Man (and woman) do not live by lulz alone.
The uniformity of the product put out by the HF writer does stand out, though. Always smears the reputation of people of color, and always works for mistrust and division between demographic groups.
You can make book on it. It’s absolutely reliable.
Well, it’s the internet—we can’t know for sure who is typing any account.
There was an interesting case that played out, years ago, surrounding a now-successful young-adult-fiction author with the initials CC. There were credible charges of plagiarism made against her, and the subject was allegedly changed (at least temporarily) by means of some sockpuppet shenanigans.
Link below if anyone is curious about epic trolls in history, but the main thing I remember is the tactic used by the chief troll of creating a sock who hated Chief Troll—a sock that was plainly an awful person. Hateful, consistently unfair and unjust, racist, and so on and so forth.
So the purpose of that revolting sockpuppet was that the reputations of all who opposed Chief Troll would be smeared, because the sock opposed Chief Troll, and Look At What Kind Of Person Opposes Chief Troll! Or at least that was the conclusion people were supposed to reach—and by the evidence of the online talk at the time, it worked. So this—create a character with announced traits who is plainly unfair and hateful, and thereby all who actually have those traits will be discredited—is a technique still in use today, apparently.
(Just as a point of interest: CC’s books are often accused of being racist and homophobic. Ugly sockpuppetry more likely to be committed by those holding ugly views? seems that way.)
Gee. I’m betting to the multitudinous women raped tortured and humiliated by the likes of R Kelly, Bill Cosby, Chris Brown and any number of wanna be pumps I’m guessing white supremacy might come up as number 2 on the worst things in their lives. Unless you have some evidence to link this to white supremacy. Hip hop culture has devalued and debased women for decades. White supremacy?
Here’s what the white “contributors” on a thread about racism need to understand: you will never, ever know what the fuck you’re talking about. It’s one thing to not know, but quite another to have an ego so fucking large that you refuse to admit it. Some humility can come in handy.
You can still call Huey out for various posts, comments – I don’t care, and never did. But as with all things, context is everything. It was more than ironic how this thread called out Huey when he was responding to a poster who, let’s just put it mildly, has a history of making racially insensitive remarks himself.
Point taken, Huey, but I nevertheless acknowledge that what I said was offensive to women. For what it’s worth, in my experience, British women seem to care a lot less than American women over the use of the c-word, but that doesn’t make it okay, so I apologize.
Huey’s an anti-white racist. And while we’re at it, look at all these n#ggers who suck! It’s like white males can’t help themselves. Sooner or later, it’s like a penis in a whorehouse: it sticks out.
Well everything I’ve googled, the studies have shown that black children are twice as likely to be diagnosed as mentally retarded than white children, even after corrections for Socioeconomic status. I can post cites if necessary.
Now I’m not going to conclude any kind of racial superiority from the results, or suggest there was inbreeding involved, and granted this was White Science done in White Laboratory Spaces, by unempathetic White Scientists who probably had Somalian Asperger’s or something and were trying to keep the brothers down. The only conclusion it suggests to me is Poor Huey is probably one of these unfortunate mentally retarded Black Souls… Yeah that seems about right.
