I realize you think that. “Many” is ill-defined, and your evidence is sparse. I tend to think that most leaders believe the core beliefs they espouse, and the true con artists are relatively rare.
Let me set your mind at ease, then! That’s a ridiculous fuckin belief about modern liberalism.
What I realize is that your views on liberalism are as accurate as asahi’s views on conservatism. And your views on race are pretty much the equivalent of Huey’s.
It’s not your idea of protesting, but protesting can come in many forms. It can be holding hands with white people and walking through the streets, or it running around the streets and throwing rocks./QUOTE]
Throwing rocks isn’t protest – it’s assault.
You know it’s not simply a choice between between “kumbaya” and “burn baby burn!”. Ever heard of that “excluded middle”?
You forgot to claim that this statement doesn’t apply to you, your ideology, or your religion. You could fix this by putting an “other peoples’” language in there. Let me help you:
You realize that people other than me who are fervent advocates and followers of an ideology or a religion other than mine are led by those who use that particular belief system as a tool to manipulate, unlike the person I idolate. Sad!
So treating people equally and Huey’s use of language, which if it were directed at a so-called special sample of a protected class would result in a ban, are equivalent? :dubious:
I must be channeling Orwell tonight. As it can only be double speak and double think to state and believe equality is bigotry. I wonder what it’s like living in a mad head.
If you let a sick patient die because treating them would be treating them unequally, then you’re a goddamned idiot. If you only make such a refusal in cases in which the sickness is caused by the socially dominant group of which you’re a part, then it may be bigotry that leads to your behavior.
Likeliest it’s both: bigotry with a candy coating of idiocy.