What the fuck is wrong with these homophobic bigots?

Esprix

You are such a jerk off, you cant even see when everyone has left you. So you are once again arguing with yourself. Leave me alone, I’ll leave you alone, as I have for quite some time.

I did note that you are spreading your “colorful” comments about the boards though. So sweet of you. Asshole

Esprix

You are such a jerk off, you cant even see when everyone has left you. So you are once again arguing with yourself. Leave me alone, I’ll leave you alone, as I have for quite some time.

I did note that you are spreading your “colorful” comments about the boards though. So sweet of you. Asshole

AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, now I feel loved! The Marvinboomerdiamond we all know and love is back!

Now why have you not posted here in so long? We’ve missed you… :wink:

Esprix


Next time I want your opinion I’ll beat it out of you.

Otto/Esprix:

I’m watching you two perverts…I know if I wait long enough you’ll buttslam each other into non-existence. :smiley:

But Marvinboomerdiamond, you said we were the same person? If I could do that to myself, I wouldn’t leave… oh, never mind!

{sigh} The last resort of the ignorant - using “buttslam” in a sentence. Our little ones are growing up so fast… {sniff}

Esprix


Next time I want your opinion I’ll beat it out of you.

No flames. (I wouldn’t know how) Just started reading this thread today. I probably should have read this one first, then posted in that other thread in GD. Things may have gone smoother over there.

Whereas it’s only a coincidence that you and Marvin always appear together. :rolleyes: Maybe you two are having a not-so-secret love affair and the two of you rag on other gays so we won’t suspect you.


When all else fails, ask Cecil.

So what did you think of this thread?

Esprix


Ask the Gay Guy!

Welp, Prop. 22 in California passed.

FUCK.

Not surprising, but fuck anyway.

I’ll just keep my eye on Vermont…

Esprix


Ask the Gay Guy!

Now I distinctly saw Rousseau poke his head into a thread on MPSIMS, and we haven’t heard peep one from him here. Now, no doubt he’ll claim he was sick of responding, but I’m going to go ahead and assume the truth is that we out-logicked him.

{BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!}

Esprix, who simply could not resist!


Ask the Gay Guy!

Esprix, don’t you understand that this thread is finished? What the fuck is the matter with you? Get a freaking hobby, for Christ’s sake.

“Out-logicked?” I hardly think so. You did prove that you can repeat yourself until you drive everybody around you fucking crazy, but that’s about it.

Nobody but you gives two shits about this thread anymore, and everybody but you can see that. You keep making these empty posts, hoping that people will pay attention to you (“What do you think of this thread, ARG220?”). But I’ve got a news flash for you here: the subject of homosexuality is wearing a little thin around here. I swear to God, you gays are like the kid in the toy store. You see something you want, and mommy won’t buy it for you. So you cry and whine and hold your breath in hopes that if you annoy the shit out of her, she’ll appease you just to get you to shut the fuck up. Well I’m not your mother. No amount of your bitching is going to get me to change a basic belief of mine. So why don’t you go and try to find somebody else to pester. Jesus Christ.

This is all I’m saying on this thread.


“History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.” -Winston Churchill

http://www.beginbids.com/ubb/smilies/icon25.gif

{BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!}

http://www.beginbids.com/ubb/smilies/icon25.gif

Oh, Rousseau, you do amuse me so - thank you for enriching my life. {hee hee hee}

Esprix


Ask the Gay Guy!

I’m not saying Esprix or Otto were bitching and whining, but…

Logic and facts don’t seem to give you a reason to change your beliefs, so what’s left?

Test post, to see if the previous post went through.

I’m not saying Otto and Esprix have been bitching, but…

Logic and facts don’t seem to alter your opinions, so what else is left? Prayer?

We’ll remember that if you come back.


When all else fails, ask Cecil.

Okay, the preceding post was made because the two before it were invisible for some reason. (No, I am NOT inflating my post count! I am NOT trying to get to 1500! How dare you…!)


When all else fails, ask Cecil.

THANK YOU! I’m glad someone else noticed this.

And if you won’t post here, Rousseau, check out my “favorite troll, idiot or juvenile” thread - you’re mentioned, with much love and affection, of course… :slight_smile:

Esprix


Ask the Gay Guy!

Here’s some pretzel logic for 'ya (from David B.},

54% of the population believes in creationism.

10% of the population is homosexual.

Homosexuality as a viable alternative to heterosexuality should be taught in schools.

Creationism as a viable alternative to evolution should not be taught in schools.

Whiny, vacuous, self-absorbed pseudo intellectual liberal.

Did I mention hypocritical?

::

Regardless of your personal love for DavidB you are not demonstrating a great deal of logic, here.

Regardless of what percent of the population believes in Creationism, there is no scientific evidence to support it. Teaching it as science is simply counter-productive to giving children a good education.

While the arguments regarding homosexuality are somewhat murkier (because we have not found clear and convincing evidence to what causes it and, in the absence of understanding, there is a great weight of cultural tradition in this society to oppose it), teaching that homosexuals should not be persecuted is a legitimate way to “establish Justice” and “insure domestic Tranquility” by not creating a subset of the population that is open to attack and harrassment. Since there is no scientific evidence that homosexuals have problems (other than persecution) or that they are “choosing” to be “deviant,” then teaching tolerance is also a way to avoid teaching ignorance.


Tom~

tom:

This is not the issue and you know it. What is advocated is teaching homosexuality as a legitimate alternative to heteroseuxality

You are applying, yet again, classical leftist contortionism.

::