I’m in Ontario - so this may not make sense to anyone who doesn’t have local knowledge.
A little background: my spouse and I left our respective 20+ year miserable marriages to be together in spring '04. His spouse was unemployed (voluntarily quit 2 years before) at the time. He paid support far in excess of what may have been ordered, mainly out of guilt, until the Case Conference last December. (Family Law here allows for an attempt at a settlement in front of a judge prior to a trial).
Over the course of the spring/summer/fall his ex’s sister died and her brother was diagnosed with terminal cancer. Truly awful, admittedly. So when he went to court and was told that he would be required to pay indefinite support, he signed over the house and property in lieu. He considered her affidavit that claimed she was too ill and depressed to seek work, let alone secure employment and felt it was reasonable to calculate his interest in matrimonial property as a reasonable settlement.
Through a miscalculation on her part, and allowing her greed full reign (or is it rein?) she admitted in an email fewer than 10 days later she was in a full time position with her former employer. And that while her affidavit said she couldn’t even seek work, she’d had 3 promising meetings with them leading to the re-employment.
That was material non-disclosure right? So they filed a motion to put through the settlement and we cross-motioned to set aside the minutes of settlement. In April we went before the court.
The judge said he thought the three meetings she had with her previous employer was material to the decision made. He asked her lawyer if it had been revealed in the Case Conference that she’d had the meetings. Her lawyer lied and said “yes, it was said”. (What she didn’t know was there was a transcript of the Case Conference. ) He said he wanted the remainder of the motion argued in front of him so he could get to the truth.
So the judge’s endorsement was that the ex’s lawyer would have to sign an affidavit swearing that she’d told the previous judge. He felt it was material and influenced the decision made by my spouse.
So by May I had a copy of the transcript. The ex’s lawyer’s affidavit said “it wasn’t said in court, it was told to my spouse’s lawyer in the hall”. So we got an affidavit from my spouse’s previous lawyer (who is now on maternity leave) stating that it wasn’t said in the hall.
We were to go to court in June - cancelled. We were to appear in July - the other side didn’t show up. We were to appear in Sept. - cancelled. We were to appear in November - we got bumped from the line up. So we finally appeared today. And guess what? The fucking judge totally flip flopped and decided it wasn’t material (irrespective of his endorsement of April). He as much as said her lies and her lawyer’s lies were to be expected. He hadn’t even read his own endorsement. Now he thinks it wasn’t material and ruled for the other side.
How can a judge ruin people this way? If he’d only said no back in April - without giving us false hope we could have stopped at $10,000. Fuck a system that can make light of someone’s life so easily and on whim change the course of what they’ve said.
So, his demanding it be heard in front of him meant we went 8 months incurring ever increasing legal fees (every time we were to go back there were new fees for preparation and the cost of waiting to be heard in court). We spent $35K on our lawyer - and they’ve awarded her costs to us - $30K. We are destroyed financially by this.
The ex benefits more than $400,000 and she now makes twice what he does. She has turned his (adult) kids against him. She emptied the investment account $65,000 and stole a cheque written to him.
As we left the court room I told her, “Boy, lying sure pays off, huh?” Her witty retort: “Slut!” To which I replied, “Yeah, like you’re a moral barometer”.
Was it worth a shot? Yup. Will we be okay? Yup.
Our lawyer thinks we should appeal - but we’re so far in debt now it’s making me sick.
Any thoughts on risking an appeal? Any great suggestions for legal revenge? (Other than living well, of course).
Thanks for listening.