I’d use “breasts.” After all, isn’t this a discussion about cooking poultry?
Well, the OP didn’t leave us with any options from which to choose (Indeed, he left us nothing at all!) but I’m going to go out on a limb here and say “breasts” is probably a good default term for breasts.
But you could always try “white meat” if a good euphamism is what floats your boat.
Another vote for “breasts”. Doesn’t seem to bother anyone who’s not hypersensitive.
Personally, I prefer the term “tig ol’ bitties.” Anybody who finds that objectionable has a stick up their bottom.
tortuga, in polite company, we say “bick up their stottom”.
My grandma uses ‘funbags’, so I generally follow her lead.
“jiggling jigglies” or “feed sacks.”
my extremely conservative, prudish friend uses these terms all the time.
Dirty Pillows.
“I can see your dirty pillows! Everyone can!”
“They’re called breasts, Mama.”
I find ‘boobs’ to be well tolerated in all sorts of company.
But any euphemism used around a bunch of kids will cause them to break out in uncontrollable fits of giggling!
gazongas
juggs
milk melons
“Golden bozos”
Ya can’t go wrong with the ol’ classic “hooters”.
(If anyone objects, I just tell them I’m talking about the burger place…)
Breasts.
Although, I like feedbags, since, technically, that’s what they are.
I like feedbags too, Guin!
Frederick “Fronkensteen”: What knockers!
Inga: Oh, ssank you!
That one works pretty well, don’t you think?
I think you’re just supposed to say, “these things,” and then grab the nearest pair.
::moving to WI to stike up a ‘breast’ conversation with Scarlett::
Breasts, or bodacious ta-tas.
A women I know occasionally wears a t-shirt with BODACIOUS TA-TAS proudly emblazoned across the front.
They are, too. 
Breasts, or even boobs is a winner as i have seen.