No, good thing! Good thing!
I promise there won’t be any splinters.
That’s only because he can’t get wood. rimshot
Sorry, Wikkit, I couldn’t help myself. Besides, it’s like teeball. You left it right there, sitting in front of the plate.
Ouch, Beeb, that hurts. <sniffle> I expected better from other DNA nick-types </sniffle>
Ah, who am I kidding. I would have made the joke if I’d thought of it.
It would be interesting to find out the real origins of the word “cocksucker”, I would imagine it refers to someone that’s submissive and is probably more a slight to women that weren’t in high standiing, i.e. a respectable woman wouldn’t suck a cock.
This bit about it being homophobic smells of homomania, and that sucks, it blows, and it’s a cocksucking impediment to free fucking speech.
The problem, Stinkpalm is that sometimes people throw these terms around without thinking and they immediately end up showing how shallow, hateful and generally unpleasant they are.
To me, the fact that someone is willing to throw around terms like “cocksucker” or “faggot” or “homo” when tossing insults around simply indicates that the person has been brought up badly and has a real problem with sexual insecurity.
After all, remember that the first guy to yell “cocksucker” is usually the guy who most recently tasted cock!
Actually, that should read “I, as a person who doesn’t like things being stuck into his poop chute, do not like being fucked up the ass.” Being heterosexual has nothing to do with it. Lots of straight people (men and women) like anal sex, and lots of gay people don’t. While I don’t necessarily disagree with your conclusions, your premises are invalid.
Do you have some sort of cite for this insight? This sounds like a TVGuy original here. :rolleyes:
He who smelt it, dealt it.
He who denied it, supplied it!
He who said the rhyme, committed the crime.
Guilty dog barks first.
[sub]Damn, that sure sounded country.[/sub]
He who smelt it first is he who dealt the burst.