My mom is 82 and starting to show signs of cognitive decline and short term memory loss. Along with that has come periods of heightened anxiety. For the past 2 years I have been managing her medical care by making and keeping track of her appointments, going with her, giving information to the doctors about her conditions and test results, and explaining it all to her. I think her ability to make decisions is starting to decline. I need to get my thinking about this straightened out before something more critical happens. Basically, I have to balance her possibly faulty thinking against my desire to respect her genuine wishes, as well as considering her best interest and quality of life.
Yesterday’s events illustrated this dilemma. She asked me to cancel an important appointment with a cardiologist because she had a lot of anxiety about our driving during ordinary snow flurries; I overrode her wishes, and we went anyway. The purpose of the visit was to see if she could benefit from an angioplasty, and whether it was worth the risk to do an angiogram. Mom was adamant that she did not want either of them, but it was clear to me that this was mostly because she intensely dislikes going to the hospital (she broke both her hips one after the other, and hated her stays in hospital), and she had heard that there was some discomfort involved. Fortunately, the cardiologist felt that she didn’t need either procedure, so the point was moot. But the dilemma still remains in my mind: what if he said she needed them?
In my opinion, an angioplasty is a relatively benign procedure that takes one day, and does not require a stay in hospital. If it could give Mom better energy, clarity of thought, and a better chance to survive her next heart attack, then I would have persisted in convincing her to accept, and I think she would have eventually given in. Part of my reason for doing so would have been that her objections are mostly based on a desire to stay home and avoid aggravation and discomfort.
ETA: Oh crud, I posted in MPSIMS. Should have posted in IMHO. Will ask a mod to move.
But if the situation involved, say a diagnosis of cancer, and she refused chemo because she wanted no part of the side effects, then I would likely just accept her decision.
In between these two clear areas is the mushy grey middle where I’m a lot less sure how to proceed. I guess if I felt she was refusing out of inertia and desire to avoid bother, I would be inclined to pressure her to accept, but if it seems like a reasonable assessment of the pros and cons, I would be more likely to just let her chose. This is all more complicated because of her declining memory and ability to think. I am her designated decider in her power-of-attorney if she becomes clearly incompetent, but right now, she’s neither totally her old sharp self nor totally out of it.
Have you had to “help” an ageing loved one make decisions like this? On what did you base your decision to agree / contradict? Do you think I should just shut up even if I think she’s making a decision against her best interest? I know this is going to come up again, and I need clearer guidelines than I have now.