:eek: :o
And here I’ve just been skipping this thread, thinking there’s really no point in checking it out…and Medea’s Child mentions enjoying flirting with little ol’ me?! 
Well, shucks, darlin…you’re pretty fun to flirt with yourself.
Oh, what’s this I have here?..well, I didn’t realize I left my camera here. Hmm…now what could we photograph. 
How YOU GUYS doin’?
GUYS??
Um … I’d like to buy a clue for $200, Pat.
Hmmm, Euty, does this question mean my assumption is wrong?
(The assumption being: GUYS is used colloquially in a unisex context, and you can refer to women as guys too - in a casual manner…)
So who owes the 200$?
(I couldn’t provede a clue, but asked a counter question instead.)
And Cyn, may I offer some large vocabulary to you in a free time of yours?
Watermelon Man…
Hello! I have to sleep sometime plus I do have a full time job.
And besides after you referred to me as a guy…baby, I’m all woman.
Ok Hardygrrl,
I believe you…you are all woman:)
…but i could still arrange some free time for a little bit of checking, if you are game!!!
I’ve been feeling the sexual tension between Mortwight and Nephwrack building up recently.
I’d like to see the two of them go at it with their famous and sexy “*sets mode +o” flirting style 
— G. Raven
Sorry Watermelon Man-I’m leaving for work shortly. I’ll be back later tonight ::checks dayplanner:: and should be free for flirts.
[sub] BTW-Only one Doper knows the true scope of my flirting power. Y’all only get me to a seven,eight tops. [/sub]
A lot people do use the word as you did. I know a lot of women who do it. Heck, even guys use it that way.
Yeah…and it’s only getting worse. …snore…
[sup]Shoot, lookit how the board runs off without you when yer a nine-to-fiver…[/sup]
Well, I’d rather go diving for yours.
Which would demonstrate my previously referrenced breath control.
/START Hamadryad MINOR EGO-STROKING (has undivided attention, lacks the curse words of the full mode)
Another “newbie” with a few words…
Do you see anyone mourning the tragic loss you pose to this thread (or even slightly dissapointed)? No? Didn’t think so either…
If this is so beneath you I’d hope you wouldn’t bother posting here but alas, you grant us no such satisfaction.
By the way, don’t bother replying, wouldn’t want to hijack a fine flirting thread for those who enjoy such, in particular with your litter, and besides you are so not worth it.
/END Hamadryad MINOR EGO-STROKING
To the others sorry for the hijack.
Johnny,
Unless I’m mistaken, Hama isn’t being condescending, just playing a little hard-to-get game. I, for one, am not taking any offense.
Johnny,
Unless I’m mistaken, Hama isn’t being condescending, just playing a little hard-to-get game. I, for one, am not taking any offense.
Moderator’s Notes: I’d like you to explain to me that comment of yours. From here it looks like a personal attack. We frown upon that and will not tolerate very much of it. It’s also in your best interests to respond to me sooner, rather than later. And via this e-mail address, rseaney@teamsigma.com rather than on this board. Okay?
Didn’t look too personal from up here on the peanut gallery…
::UncleBill guides thread back to original intent, as it kicks and screams in protest::
Oh, Ginger, my Ginger, ye of the backwoods blind men who cannot see the loveliness in their midst, I’ll shield you with a parasol to keep the damaging rays of sun from your perfect, velvety skin; I’ll crank my a/c on full blast, power company be damned, to keep you cool and comfortable, and dress my cat up like a polar bear, just to make you feel comfortable when you come here to Miami.
Maybe NEXT weekend?
Is that a poll of everyone who has read this, or just your own opinion? I’m askin’ 'cuz, well, ya see, we got a Pit thread about it from the subject of the attack, so apparently somebody took it personally. Fair enough?
Just mine, of course. I can’t presume to know what anyone else thinks! It’s mightly lonesome up here in the peanut gallery, too; everyone else is flirting, you see.
I need me some high-power binoculars and a whole vat of popcorn…
I don’t generally whine over flirt threads. I once brought up what I thought was a reasonable protest to a thread which invited all to come to a consensus on who was the sexiest doper. To me, that’s different from flirting–but given the hostile reaction I got, it wasn’t a distinction shared by some others, and I think I’ve been branded an Anti-Flirting Hag. Nothing could be further from the truth.
For one thing, I’d be delighted with more flirting threads where I got mentioned. Heh.
But speaking generally, do I want them to proliferate? Truthfully, no. I know they’re harmless fun, and there’s nothing wrong with the boosts they give people (and hey, maybe they’ll spark more real-life romances between dopers). But I don’t necessarily want more of them. Why not? Well, despite how much this makes me seem like a goddamn feel-good pollyanna (or an embittered old bitch) I’ll confess that I believe that for some dopers, they make the board seem cliquish and they emphasize how much on the fringes some posters are and perhaps always will be. Yes, yes, I know what a wet blanket I sound like. Someone’s got to say it. So I think the occasional ones we have are enough.
As for the second question, what I’d like to see in more flirt threads are posts which have something to offer anyone who’s reading. That means wit, interesting content, insights, etc. Not just lists of names, and not just personalized one-on-one chat-like exchanges. I mean, of course people will name names (that’s the point!) but you can make it interesting reading nonetheless. I don’t this as a criticism of anyone in particular, I’m just thinking about what makes threads enjoyable (to me).