strokes chin
Good points, RickJay.
nods sagely
Sean Hannity, obviously. Even from the next room over. Does my future Emperorship feature a department of “Slapping Martin Shkreli in his mouth whenever it looks like he’s about to speak” ? No, no it doesn’t. But Hannity’s penned down. Oh yes.
Maybe Pai deserves punching more that Shkreli, but if the criteria is “take a look at his face and evaluate how much it needs punching”, it’s Shrkeli. Again, just on face. I mean to go full Godwin, Hitler is more punchable that Shkreli, but it’s not based on face. Based on face and face alone, Shkreli beats Hitler. You can’t beat Shkreli, to find a face more punchable you’d have to go all the way back to James Spader in “Pretty in Pink”, who had a face artificially created in a lab for punchability. That doesn’t count.
Have a Walnut?
Yeah, you know what? Bad idea.
After watching Paul Ryan try to justify the tax cuts for the rich on the talk shows today, I’m feeling even more conflicted. Maybe it’s no Shkreli, but that face is still pretty damn punchable.
Ryan’s face is pretty punchable too, if you need a tiebreaker.
It’s Ryan And McConnell for the second round.
McConnell can just pull his face back into his shell. No fair.
Again, I’m calling shenanigans on the failure to separate general punchability from face punchability.
Then use Ryan’s face to break through the shell.
Tough call.
Based on their history of individual punch-in-the-face behaviours, I’d go with Shkreki.
Agreed, except first, I’d make sure to take him on a long walk into the back 40.
Finally something I can get behind. (I don’t know who the people in the OP are.)
Ajit Pai is punchable for what he did. Martin Shrkreli could donate a kidney to you, pay off your debts and adopt a busload of kittens and you would still want to punch that face.
Ajit Oai is chairman of the FCC, which just screwed the internet.
Martin Shkreli, from Wiki, “is an American businessman, former hedge fund manager, and convicted, currently incarcerated felon.” who screwed people out of a lot of money.
I had to Google them myself. 
Hmm violent fantasies about political opponents. This is healthy.
Shut up, you.
Sure, but which one do you think is most punchable?
You’re reaching calling them political opponents. There seems to be bipartisan distaste for those two.
But, whatever, yeah I think it is healthy. Let it out here where it’s harmless.
Less harmful than demanding that the losing candidate be imprisoned without reason or trial.