I mean, come on! I’d vote for her over trump if she were in a coma. What the fuck difference does it make what her policies are? Her main policy is that she’s NOT out to destroy the country and become a dictator. That’s good enough for me.
As for watching the debate: I’ll have it on, maybe with the captions on and the sound off. For as long as I can stand it. I generally hate these live events. Too nerve-wracking.
I’m secretly (well not secretly, since I’m saying it here) that Kamala asks the Orange Fraudster a question that causes him to have a fit of apoplexy and expire on the spot.
She’s not after your vote; she needs to convince those on the fence.
She came across as “I was against it before I was for it.” It was apparent
to almost everyone but you, apparently.
Well, of course.
I’ve never been to her website, so yeah, I missed it. I would suspect that a lot of people missed it. But again, I don’t need to be convinced, but a lot of other people do.
I don’t watch these live events because there’s nothing either can say that would change my mind. I don’t care who wins the debate; I’m not voting for president of the debate team, but for president of the country.
I’m watching because I am one of those undecided individuals. I expect to learn a good deal about the policies of each candidate during the course of the debate and will vote for whoever elucidates best upon their vision for the future for America and how they will go about implementing those policies. Isn’t that what Presidential debates are all about?
/s
I heard one famous snark (paraphrasing) to be undecided in this election is like being offered a plate full of shit with broken glass mixed in it or chicken and then asking ‘how is the chicken prepared?’
I read transcripts the next day rather than watch. But last time I found out, the next day, that the first few minutes had changed history. So I will try it and see how far I get. If other family members start talking over the candidates, that will be the end for me.
America does not want a debate, they want a MMA center ring showdown.Which sometimes has fake blood.
Harris does not need to emphasis good policy and funding prospects-that she does on campaign trial:she needs to point out that Don does not and never had a grasp of the job.
I try to see what makes that old man so appealing to so many that they are giddy. I wonder if he will stalk Kamala Harris around the stage just to show how tall he is. While she is defending women’s medical health and families he will be showing domestic abuse intimidation tactics.
We just started watching Nicole Wallace, and she had a quote from an unnamed Trump staffer who said they were afraid Trump might lose control and say something crazy. And she said exactly what I was thinking: Who in the blue flocked hell would want to vote for someone for president when you have strong suspicions that person might lose control???
This is along the lines I was going to say. I doubt many “undecideds” will be watching tonight, and I suspect any that do will still be undecided tomorrow morning. How people are still undecided at this point is hard to fathom. But yea, America wants to see the whole “Two candidates enter. One candidate leaves” thunderdome thing, not a reasoned and well moderated debate where they are discussing issues and their approach to handling problems.
All anyone wants to see is the fireworks and gotchas and gaffs, and each side’s media will predictably seize on any mistake the other side made and declare their candidate “won”. These Presidential debates are no longer relevant, so I am not sure what the purpose is any more - maybe this will be the last one we ever see?
I doubt I will watch. So much meaning and significance will be attributed to whatever happens during the snooze fest. People have mostly made up their minds about Trump. There will be no serious debate about party or policy. Pundits will talk for hours and hours, but you are unlikely to have learned anything you did not already know.
You couldn’t possibly pay me enough to listen to Trump bloviate for an extended period of time. Also, even beyond the aggravating Trump factor all presidential debates suck, at all times, always.
I’ll read the post-mortem here and elsewhere and if there is a particularly interesting-sounding short clip, I might force myself to watch that. But the whole debate? I may be a (mild) political junkie, but to me watching an entire presidential debate featuring Trump would be like willingly licking the business end of a bullet ant.
While I have made up my mind, I can totally see people (28 percent in one poll) saying they do not know what Harris stands for, and that they want to know. This is rational. Why have a presidential system if you do not focus on that?
I’m more concerned about what kind of people the president will appoint. I do not necessarily want a “conviction politician” who is going to try to push through an agenda for which getting the needed 60 U.S. Senate votes is an impossibility. So I’m watching the debate, at least as much of it as I can stomach, more because it is important for the future of NATO and world peace rather than because I want to learn about Harris’s dreams likely to crumble in Congress.
Because Trump is so blatantly and colossally terrible. Provably so.
Maybe Harris is not the best but almost anything is better than Trump. Maybe Mitch McConnell would be worse. Maybe DeSantis. But it is not difficult to be better than Trump and Harris easily gets over that hurdle.