Don’t forget the liberal dosings of skin cream.
They have, IIRC, two kids. And don’t be fooled: she has had work done. They’re 100% natural, but they’ve been relocated somewhat, and she’s had some eye work done. The casual observer might not notice, but the longtime connoisseur has seen the changes.
That’s… sort of what I was going for. Guess I wasn’t very clear.
Hm…“knead to know” indeed.
I’m travelling in the same orbit, Cal.
IIRC the madam in question had a prior career as an accountant or some other finance related work before…finding her true calling.
From what I’ve seen, not only is she very good looking, but the way she talks, dresses and comports herself tends to suggest someone of the above background instead of the usual two-bit jezebels one finds in her line of work, or at least, what I imagine anyway - haven’t really had any scandalous affairs with any accountants myself recently. I find it very compelling*.
*I am jerking it like a motherfuck!
Here is a ten year old article about her: Inside Wifey Inc. | WIRED
Considering that she’s pretty much an internet icon, I have to wonder how that mixes with having kids. As has been pointed out, she must be often recognized in the real world, and I’d be amazed if her whole family wasn’t aware of her stardom.
It sure would make for an interesting parent/teacher night, wouldn’t it?
There was recently a kerfluffle about them moving into a relatively well-to-do neighborhood and neighbors finding out who they were and what they did and having a problem with it. I don’t recall what the deal was.
I like Wifey; what’s not to like? 
“You have such beautiful skin, Mrs Poppadopolis! What’s your secret?”
She and Carol “Wild Rose” Cox were two of the early pioneers in amateur on-line porn. They both seem to have found loyal target audiences and continue to be successful by catering to those audiences.
Though both of them show plenty of vaginal sex, Wifey staked out territory that runs heavily towards variations on the money shot. Carol Cox did more with anal sex, double penetrations, and MFF threesomes. They’re both middle-aged women now, and still going strong. One must admire their stamina.
She could do a Phoebe Bouffay: "You’re wondering where you recognize me from, aren’t you? Well, IT WAS FROM PORN! THAT’S RIGHT, YOUR PERVERT BOYFRIEND SAW ME IN PORN !!!
I think I’m showing my age when I know who Wifey is, but hat to Google Phoebe Buffay!
Wel… she’s always smiling
Semen makes women happy
To get to the … ahem … meat of the matter, let me say that the thing I have always found most attractive about Wifey is not merely what she does* but that she enjoys doing it so much. Seriously: if you don’t think you like porn, give Wifey a try, because it’s not porn like anywhere else. Especially some of the earliest stuff. They giggle with each other, they make jokes, she winces when he gets it in her eye, it’s great, great stuff.
- which, for anyone who may still be guessing, is first and foremost this: she swallows. Everything else she does is widely visible anywhere else on the Internet
Now, see, when your title read, “That Wifey” I immediately thought, “Oh wow, I haven’t read that Judy Blume book in forever.”
Obviously, that Wifey means different things to different people.
I like Wifey clips, but I miss Heather of the ideepthroat series.
And I haven’t thought of Carol Cox in YEARS. Wow. It’s interesting to see she’s still out there. I dropped her a brief e-mail once, probably 10-12 years back. I think she had just had a kid or something, and I dropped a note to say “congrats”, and she actually wrote me back. Was interesting.
This was before it was really a paysite, and more of an exhibitionist thing. She was still having “parties” with fans at the time.
Wow.
Her name is Heather Brooke. Go forth and search and be glad. There are literally hundreds of clips of her available for free on the net.
Actually, Brooke is the name of one of her co-stars. People started calling her Heather Brooke after clips from some of her work with Brooke circulated on newsgroups with the name "Heather Brooke . . . "