Wildest Bill, go fuck yourself

I know you’re not THE gay - I was just referring to one of Margaret Cho’s endlessly repeated jokes about her mother asking her, in reference to one of her friends:

“Margalet, is he da GAY?”

“No, Mom, he’s not THE gay. There’s not like, just one gay. He doesn’t do the parade all by himself…”

My attempt to slip a joke in there that you’d get but Bill wouldn’t. Turns out neither of you did, so I guess that means I wasn’t funny. Hate it when that happens.

Oh, and about bold and not bold and italics. I was under the impression WB might not know about the codes that you need to stick in there [B] BOLD WORD [_/B] afterwards (no underscores for the real thing) - isn’t that what you’re asking, Bill?

There’s probably a primer of some sort in the “about this message board” board, isn’t there? And I’m on an Imac using Netscape, and bold doesn’t actually show up here. I don’t know if that’s Netscape or what, but that might be contributing to the problem.

Esprix’s tips on quote marks are good ones. Since we’re giving grammar lessons, I’ll add mine - and these are directed sorta at Bill (in a friendly and constructive way, I should add), but anyone else feel free to listen in since we’re in the Pit and people who misuse these bug the hell out of me :

You’re - contraction for “you are”
Ex. - “You’re so silly, Rhino!”

Your - belonging to you
Ex. - “Pick up your clothes.”

It’s - contraction for “it is”
Ex. “It’s raining men!”

Its (no apostrophe) - belonging to “it”
Ex. - “The dog lost its collar.”

They are actually four separate and distinct words with different meanings, not two words that have four meanings.
I understand that can be confusing, as usually one adds an apostrophe to show posession, except you don’t in the case of “its”. That’s why it’s tricky, but with proper practice it becomes second nature.

Next week’s lesson:
Me, Myself, and I - Three more words that are not interchangeable.

" . . . a twenty-volume set of the Encyclopedia International, a case of Turtle Wax, and a year’s supply of Rice-a-Roni, the San Francisco treat!"

-D. Pardo

As long as it wasn’t a big dictionary or grammer made easy book for grammer dummies I didn’t miss out. :wink: :smiley:

Grammar!!! Goddamnit it is GRAMMAR!!!

And please, go and buy yourself a grammar book. Or if as possibly can be construed from your last post, you already own one, read and use the fucking thing!

Yeah, and maybe you can get your gram’mer and grampa to buy it for ya!


Yer pal,
Satan - Commissioner, The Teeming Minions

TIME ELAPSED SINCE I QUIT SMOKING:
Six months, two days, 22 hours, 27 minutes and 55 seconds.
7437 cigarettes not smoked, saving $929.68.
Extra time with Drain Bead: 3 weeks, 4 days, 19 hours, 45 minutes.

Don’t fill up on grammar crackers, dinner is almost ready.

Sorry could not help the previous post…
Dammit!!! I have had to go through and read his posts. (morbid curiousity) Damn You.
This one is the best… ‘it is a classic’

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=41711

Wildest Bill-Get off your cross-somebody needs the wood.
(TM my friend Zae).

Oh, and let’s not forget the Christian who openly admits to favoring discrimination against homosexuals… :rolleyes:

Esprix

Wait, add we’re allowed to discriminate against lawyers (because, you know, they’re all scum and all).

Yeah, you’re the epitome of Christ-like behavior… :rolleyes:

Esprix

I’m still thinking about Wildest Bill’s accusation that Esprix has an “infactuation.”

As a word, I like it. It has a lof of potential.

“Infactuation - a strong compulsion to have your facts straight before shooting off your mouth.”

Seems like a quality worthy of emulation, doesn’t it WB?

I’ve been gone a few days, so things might have changed, but my interactions/observations with/of the Wild Guy usually go as follows:

  1. Wildest Bill makes a moronic and almost illegible opening statement;
  2. Several people flame him;
  3. One or two posters respond seriously to him;
  4. Wildest Bill actually listens and responds to the serious posts, and often expresses respect for the opposing POV. Of course, his responses still show a complete contempt for the concept of grammar.

Do I agree with him? No. Do I want my daughter to date him? Hell no! Do I want to take a dictionary and shove it up his ass? Absolutely. Is he a fuckwad? I don’t think so.

Sua

Originally posted by SuaSponte

Not ever? What if I said the sky was blue sometimes? :wink:

IRL I am a real charming fellow are you sure? :smiley: Besides my wife would get half or should I say she would get half of whats was left over after the lawyers get theirs.

Are you saying I talk out of my butt like Ace Ventura does? :smiley:

Thanks Sue.

Esprix:

Wildest Bill is the type of cretin who feeds off of this kind of attention. I’m sure he’s stroking his ego so fast over this he’s just spraying everything like a cat in heat.
I understand your annoyance with him and dolts like him.
I’ve had to suffer tradesilicon and a few others who just love to be dickhead advocates and make absurd claims just so they can attempt to feel superior even though they still haven’t been able to grow an opposable thumb. Some people cannot be chastised with a strong, well supported argument, or with the most scathing of flames. Say what you want, but remember that it probably won’t stick. For it to stick, his mind would have to be open and he’d have to hear you. All he can hear is himself, and what a hideous thing that must be to listen to. I think it would be like listening to Rush Limbaugh and Dr. Laura fucking.

Oh, man. I wish you hadn’t said that.

…must…erase…mental…image…

On the subject of WB, I don’t want to sound like a “dickhead advocate”, but I’ve met a number of people like him where I work (it must be something in the water around here). Most of them are pretty decent folk, but they are simply not used to diversity of background/lifestyle/opinion, and often have no idea how offensive some of the things that they say can be to others.

Of course, some of them are racist, homophobic, hate-filled assholes, too. But IMHO, I don’t think WB fits into that category. I think his statements, ridiculous as they often are, arise more out of ignorance than hatred. He appears to have taken some of the criticism directed at him to heart (regarding his terrible grammar, at least). Maybe the other comments will eventually have an impact, too.

After posting a wonderful thread in the “Fuck lawyers if they can’t take a joke” thread and him totally missing the point… yeah, I’m done.

{washing hands}

He can hoist himself on his own petard from now on - needs no help from me.

Esprix

For Esprix’s sake (and the rest of us), I hope that WB doesn’t start to feel like he’s being bullied here.

He bragged in the IMHO bully thread that as a kid, he went after 4 bullies with a gun. Even included a smilie. I hope he was just trying to fit in after we explained Ender Wiggin to him, but…

Well, Ender did have something to do with exterminating the “buggers,” if I remember the plot correctly. But I don’t think we want to go there! :wink:

Just for the record, Orson Scott Card is a Mormon – which may or may not be ironic in view of the Pit threads 'Sprix has going these days! :smiley: