So I was surfing around tonight and I came across resident Fox News demagogue Bill O’Reilly interviewing some politician about the drug traffic from Mexico. O’Reilly, as usual, was advocating total warfare on Mexicans coming over the border and calling for the (illegal) use of the military to try to stop drug smugglers. I’ve heard his kill-all-the-Mexicans rant before, and I was about to change the channel when this little gem came out of his mouth:
“Well, the Mexican wetbacks…or mules, or whatever you want to call them…”
Wetbacks? WETBACKS?
I knew O’Reilly was an ass, but I didn’t know he was such an ignorant ass. He didn’t seem to have any idea that he had said anything objectionable.
Have I slipped into an alternate universe where the term “wetback” is no longer pejorative and racist?
Fuck you, O’Reilly, once again you have proven yourself to be television’s foremost ass-monkey!
Well, the term “wetback” refers specifically to illegal immigrants who get “wet backs” in the process of crossing the Rio Grande so as to enter the US undetected. (Isn’t that right?)
So, as a matter of semantics, he was accurate. (Not that that’s OK.)
[quote] Troy McClure SF
A lot of racial pejoratives had prosaic origins. “wop” was an acronym for “without papers.” "Kike"is from the Yiddish word “keikl” which means circle. Jews had their papers marked with a circle (supposedly to represent a Star of David) at Ellis island.
That doesn’t make these terms acceptable (as you noted yourself).
I knew I should have Snopesed that little tidbit before I posted it. You are correct, of course. According to word-detective.com the acronym story is bullshit.
We have dicussed this before. When you post such obviously false accusations about a leading and well-respected pundit, you open yourself and the Central Committee to…just a second…what…what!!…are you shitting me!..
I seriously doubt he is going to get slammed on this. He says “wetbacks” every single time he talks about the issue of illegal immigration, and it hasn’t been an issue, yet.