[QUOTE=JRDelirious]
This being the pit, I can say that indeed upon hearing the news, a certain track by Queen ran through my head.
[/QUOTE]
We are the Champions or We Will Rock You?
Other than those, I’m stumped.
[QUOTE=Lochdale]
Shrug, seems to me that voice mails only confirm that he had a meth problem. The gay sexual relations are a different story.
I think it would be both a political and moral mistake to rush to condemn the man. Let’s see how this all plays out first particulary vis-a-vis the allegations of a sexual congress.
[/QUOTE]
I have to say this gives me the heebie jeebies. Like it would somehow be ok if the guy just had a meth problem and not teh gay.
While I have never quite figured out how gay marriage was supposed to harm my family, but I sure can see a lot of harm to families by meth. Whether it is the meth lab releasing toxens and creating potential bombs in family neighborhoods; or it is the harm created by bringing us the next generation of drug addicts to abuse and neglect their kids. (I already see the last generation of kids of drug addicts in my classroom) These people do harm my family. They cost me as a tax payer in terms of policing and schools. They cost me as a cold and alergy sufferer in terms of having a hard time buying the colds medication that works.
The only cost to me in terms of gay marriage, is that my daughter’s best friend’s would have had the same protections under the law that my daughter does when her bio mom died. Oh wait. That isn’t a cost.
[QUOTE=newcrasher]
I don’t think the left gets us at all, because when you mention Christian, people already have an image, and it is not what my friends are into.
[/QUOTE]
Maybe with you just say “Christian,” but if you specify the way you did above, I’m sure most of the left would get you just fine. Again, the vast majority of liberals in this country are Christians themselves, so…
I think that the republikan party is more or less filled with closet-cases
[QUOTE=5que]
Well, that and he admits getting a massage from the guy, but I’m sure it was perfectly innocent. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
[/QUOTE]
If this man only wanted a massage, why did he need to get one from a male prostitute? I have received dozens of massages in my life from registered massage therapists, both men and women. They were wonderful therapeutic and entirely non-sexual. Male prostitutes do not have degrees in massage therapy, do they? Are there no legitimate RMTs listed in the yellow pages near where he lives?
As Borat would say: “Is sad that America is havink such bad shortage of masseurs. Poor man obliged to go to bum-fucking sodomite just to get rubbink of sore muscles!” 
This is pricless. From uglybeech’s link:
Uh huh. “Stimulation of a new brand”. Driving home with a “secret little thrill”. Not so much a minty toothpaste kind of thrill as a hot, meth-enhanced private “massage” kind of thrill, maybe.
[QUOTE=ThePCapeman]
newcrasher, is there anyone you would consider pit-worthy?
[/QUOTE]
One of the things I am aware of is that in my earnestness, I can come across as self-righteous. I also am aware that I am not “right”. There is a real danger for me and my fellows to develop a new fundamentalism that simply exchanges the religious-right’s disdain for queers/libs/sinners for my own disdain for the religious-right. And I don’t want to do that.
I know The Pit is mostly harmless. In fact it probably is helpful that the intellectual heavyweights we have around here have a place to blow off steam. I don’t have a problem with it at all. I have begun a few (lame) pittings myself.
I have been struggling with the issues I have written about in this thread. I guess when this thread popped up and I was the first to respond, I took advantage of the situation to expound on some things I have been thinking about for a while.
So, in the spirit of The Pit…
Fuck off queerboy.
[QUOTE=Squink]
Another One Bites the Dust[sup]*[/sup]: Mokele-mbembe is crying today.
- That’s a Queen tune
[/QUOTE]
We get to laugh at that one, right? I mean, turning the other cheek and all, but IT’S KENT FUCKING HOVIND, and he’s facing up to 228 years in jail, because he thought he didn’t have to pay taxes because he was doing “God’s work.” That is mock-worthy, right?
Screw it. I’m laughing anyway.
[QUOTE=newcrasher]
I have been struggling with the issues I have written about in this thread. I guess when this thread popped up and I was the first to respond, I took advantage of the situation to expound on some things I have been thinking about for a while.
So, in the spirit of The Pit…
Fuck off queerboy.
[/QUOTE]
That’s the spirit!
Mighty big leap, though. Be careful you don’t sprain something. 
[QUOTE=The Flying Dutchman]
If we ever want to see change in that powerful religious right community it isn’t going to come from outside. Haggard’s fall is really our loss.
[/QUOTE]
I agree with the first statement but not the second.
Change will come in the religious right community from the bottom up, as a younger generation of Christians forms online communities and coming up with their own conclusions about things, rather than trusting in televangelists.
Jesus stated two positive commandments, which you know of, and was particularly irked by two kinds of sins: hypocrisy, and hardness of heart. With respect to gays and to his own sexuality, Haggard’s demonstrated both in abundance. If one is expecting anything from evangelical Christianity that would have anything to do with the Jesus of the Gospels, such a man’s leadership is harmful, not helpful. Perhaps less harmful than that of a Pat Robertson or James Dobson, but that’s not saying a whole hell of a lot.
[QUOTE=look!ninjas]
We get to laugh at that one, right? I mean, turning the other cheek and all, but IT’S KENT FUCKING HOVIND, and he’s facing up to 228 years in jail, because he thought he didn’t have to pay taxes because he was doing “God’s work.” That is mock-worthy, right?
Screw it. I’m laughing anyway.
[/QUOTE]
Sweet.
[QUOTE=newcrasher]
Fuck off queerboy.
[/QUOTE]
NEWCRASHER YOU HOMOPHOBIC PRICK
I’m sick of you shitting all over threads with your mindless hate.
on the internets you cannot win, grasshopper.
Don’t have much use for them, myself, but my understanding is that when the “smilie” is used, the observer is supposed to take the post as being in jest. A mite touchy, aren’t you?
[QUOTE=elucidator]
Don’t have much use for them, myself, but my understanding is that when the “smilie” is used, the observer is supposed to take the post as being in jest. A mite touchy, aren’t you?
[/QUOTE]
My impression is that uglybeech’s post was to be taken in the same spirit as the apostrophe that ended newcrasher’s – viz, in jest.
Which, I think, mean that those weren’t planes doing a flyover or low-flying birds that you heard…
[QUOTE=elucidator]
Don’t have much use for them, myself, but my understanding is that when the “smilie” is used, the observer is supposed to take the post as being in jest. A mite touchy, aren’t you?
[/QUOTE]
Guess I left off my own:
Couldn’t resist a little friendly torture.
Looking for a link, but CNN breaking news reports that his church council has found that he has committed immoral sexual acts, and wil be removed immediately.
Correction. Not the church council, but an overseer board (instituted by Haggard) that has no other connection to the church.
[QUOTE=uglybeech]
Guess I left off my own:
Couldn’t resist a little friendly torture.
[/QUOTE]
Well, thats all sorted out then. Jolly good. Carry on.
[QUOTE=FriarTed]
We are the Champions or We Will Rock You?
[/QUOTE]
Under Pressure? Crazy Little Thing Called Love? Good Old Fashioned Lover Boy? I’m Going Slightly Mad? Save Me?
Headlong?
Probably not Fat Bottomed Girls. And let’s hope it’s not Tie Your Mother Down.
[QUOTE=Thudlow Boink]
I am becoming more and more convinced that, the louder a person publically rants against some “immoral” behavior or activity and tries to get it shut down, the more likely they are to engage in something very similar in private. I don’t get it, but it seems to be true.
[/QUOTE]
“Look! Over there!”
Not that complicated, really.
Random question: Has Godhatesfags weighed in on this yet?