What the hell? So, they don’t like Michelle’s supporting girls in high school, vegetable gardens or military families? Or they just want to know what she’s doing in advance so protesters can show up? What is the “historic role of the first lady” anyway? Have they ever heard of Eleanor Roosevelt? I know that criticizing the First Lady isn’t off-limits, but legislating her behavior? Why are Republicans so eager to look so fucking stupid?
I guess I shouldn’t read anything into the the fact that Issa has been in congress for years and he has only thought of this* now*?
If I thought they were being legit (which I do NOT):
- Fight to keep the nepotism laws in effect
- Reaction to Hillary’s secret health care committee
In reality, it is partisan politics - but there is an argument that if the First Lady is going to be involved in running things, there should be some types of controls in place.
Your mistake is using the verb “thought” in relation to the compound proper noun “Darryl Issa”. Never the twain shall meet.
This is the same guy who pushed the recall of Gray Davis as governor of California because he thought he could waltz right into Sacramento without serious challenge, then cried in public when Ahnold got the nod instead.
He’s a weasel.
A really dumb weasel.
I understand you’re only stating a devil’s advocate position, but if she wasn’t elected, and she’s not on the federal payroll, then federal oversight of her ‘position’ is really inappropriate.
The continuation of that train of thought is that if she is not elected, not on the Federal payroll, and has not been confirmed by the Senate, she should not be in charge of anything.
I disagree. At least not is she is forging public policy. But, hell, I think that Cheney’s energy policy meetings should have been public too.
Well, then, put in oversights of whatever committee-head she might become. Not oversights on the first lady.
Oh, absolutely! Go after Michelle Obama, that’s perfectly brilliant! Yessirree, Bob, thats a great idea!
I wasn’t aware that she was in charge of anything. My impression has been that she’s been mostly Obama’s PR stand-in, which IS a traditional “First Lady duty”.
But this is awfully behind the times of them. IIRC, Laura Bush was involved in literacy/education, and in women’s issues overseas.
She’s not in charge of anything.
If something like that had been in place during the Reagan years would the public have gotten access to the readings from Nancy’s astrologers?
And there still would be no highway beautification program.
And no one would have been acting President after Wilson’s stroke.
I honestly do not know. She is certainly highly qualified to do more than PR. First Ladies used to be known as PR / ribbon cutters (funny - that is what VPs were too in many administrations - they get funeral duty).
Hillary’s work on health care raised the question of what IS the First Lady in terms of Federal Government oversight (from the OP’s link):
In a perfect world, Issa would be helping to clean up the uncertainty of the role of the First Lady, as we begin to get more First Ladies that are qualified for policy work. He would be trying to make sure that if Hillary were elected, Bill would have a clean role to undertake without running afoul of Constitutional and other Federal Law concerns in regards to status. Issa would even be looking forward to the day when a Republican goes back into the White House and has a spouse ready for action as well.
Apropos of nothing, but reading Issa’s name always makes me think of a drunk Discworld inhabitant.
“Issa, issa, wossname.”
Issa’s only motivation is to harrass the Obama’s and hope to contrive a political issue that Obama isn’t being “transparent” enough. Obviously this has no chance to go anywhre – it’s not a serious or sincere attempt at real legislation (the last thing the Republicans would want is for an future Republican First couples to be saddled with this garbage). It’s just about throwing rocks at the Obamas.
Barack should have this guy rendered to some Moroccan shithole for a couple of weeks.
She isn’t. Michelle Obama has no legal authority.
The President can delegate any number of Presidential duties as he sees fit to the First Lady. He could just as well delegate them to you, or Brad Pitt, or his cat, providing he isn’t assigning them to do a specific job that Congress has to approve, such as secretary of state or a similar post. There are some things he has to do himself and lots of specific positions that require Congressional vetting but things like “Hold meetings on the pet project of my choice” can be done by pretty much anyone he wants. As Algher’s cite points out, the Supreme Court has already ruled on what would seem, at least to me, to be just common sense; that the President is allowed to hire people to accomplish tasks, and that if his wife volunteers to be an unpaid employee doing some of those tasks, there’s nothing illegal about it and in fact it’s been that way for ages. Ultimately, executive authority as stated in the Constitution is still his. He’s on the hook for whatever his chosen agents do.
It’s just political nonsense. If this is the Burning Issue, if this is the most serious “danger” there is, all I can say is:
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah giggle hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah snort hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah wheeze hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
He reminds me of Jar Jar Binks
Congressman Issa Dumbass…