As I have said before, I have no intention of engaging in debate with an immature brat who can do no more than sling mud. This whole incident seems to have come about because I refused to debate the little monster on his terms.
Sorry monster, you can’t make me debate with you, no matter what the provocation. Go ahead and stack the deck any way you want, take everything out of context and re-present it in the worst possible light, you will not get a rise out of me. Game over.
Wrong. You refused to debate logically.
Game Over! Score! et cetera et cetera
::rising crescendo, as for a crowd watching a goalkeeper about to take a goal kick:: oooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
pan
Liar. You have no intention of engaging in a debate when you are proven wrong. When this happens, YOU choose to start slinging mud.
Refresh my memory, you Dumbshit Incarnate… who, pray tell, was the first person to accuse another of being a troll? Who was the one that said that another posters arguments were invalid simply because that poster was young?
That’s right, you hypocrite… that was YOU. So before you accuse someone else of slinging mud, take a nice, LO-O-O-O-ONG look in a mirror.
And what were his terms? He posted factual information that you immediately dismissed. Just because you have some sort of fanatical anti-Microsoft fetish that rivals fatherjohn’s hatred of SUV’s, that doesn’t mean that you delusions are accurate.
He wasn’t trying to debate with you. You’ve proven yourself to be a liar, a hypocrite, and a purveyor of false information. Who would want to try to debate with a spineless sack of rancid testicle stew like you?
This is rich. He “taking your words out of context”?
Answer me this, you liar: Did you or did you not accuse him of being a “troll”? Did you or did you not say that his arguments were invalid simply because he was young? Did you or did you not accuse him of violating piracy and copyright laws without a shred of evidence whatsoever?
Oh, boo-fucking-hoo, people aren’t buying your bullshit. You’re such a victim. Let us all pity you!
I DO pity you, Chas, but for a whole 'nother reason entirely.
What a brilliant rebuttle.
Y’know, Chas, I don’t care how old you are in real life. You could be the oldest living human for all I know. However, on these message boards, we can see how old you ACT… and lemme tell ya, based on your postings, I can count your mental age on one hand… with fingers to spare.
I have had no problem figuring out who the immature one in this argument is. His comments above leave no doubt.
Oh, yeah this is the Pit so…give the kid his apology and go squick some goats, Chas.E
The judges waited until Chas.E checked in so they could view the OP in the light of the rebuttal.
“I couldn’t tell the OP was by a teenager; it’s much more coherent than anything else I’ve read here. I give it an 8.7” - Boxer
“It could have used a bit more creativity in the “swear word” department without losing the intelligence of the arguments presented. I got kind of tired with “Asshole” and was looking for a strong “Cum-sicle”. I give it an 8.2” - Silverstein
“In light of Chas.E’s (should that be pronounced “Cheesey”?) “rebuttal” I think the OP blows away anything Cheesey could return. If it’s a first pit thread, I’m giving it a 9.2, otherwise, a 9.0!” - guest judge Ebert
“This is the best movie SONY has ever put out! I laughed, I cried; it was better than Cats. I’d see it again and again.” - Manning
I must say, despite the game being “over”, as it were, that I read the entire threads and didn’t see that. I did see someone engaging in frequent ad hominem attacks on Monster, and that person was wrong.
Enough already.
I’m closing this thread.
your humble TubaDiva
Administrator