[QUOTE=Omi no Kami]
Out of curiosity, what is Hatsumi sensei’s program like? I was under the impression that there was no such thing as formal “ninjutsu”, but rather a disparate set of techniques that were passed from person to person… is Hatsumi sensei teaching a single, cohesive style that he learned, or did he more centralize all the stuff he’d been taught under a single “style”?
[/QUOTE]
There are nine schools or traditions (ryûha) that he inherited, only two of which are Ninjutsu and one of those includes a lot of chemistry and medicine, with almost nothing in the way of fighting. The martial arts is mostly from the non-Ninja schools, though you could argue that the main difference between Ninjutsu and plain old Bujutsu is mindset and approach. He usually does theme periods where they concentrate on one school or one subset for a while. This year’s theme is Kukishin Ryû, which is one of the older schools in the set and so has a wider focus than some of the later, more specialized schools. The idea they’re working on right now, according to one of the training blogs I’ve found, is deception; specifically leading your opponent into thinking he can nail you while you’re actually setting him up for something nasty.
There’s a certain amount of cross-pollination and syncretism both because fighting is fighting, and because one guy collected all these things and made them into one school, but the focus of the style really ends up making the movements fairly distinct. For example, Gyokko-ryū uses a lot of pressure points, and so has an emphasis on precise strikes to specific vulnerable areas, lots of redirections and subtle ways of creating openings to exploit. Kotō-ryū takes a brute force approach, since it’s a school of koppo-jutsu, or bone-breaking, and basically everything is an attack. A block is treated as an opportunity to damage a limb, the movements are more linear and direct, looking quite a bit like old traditional hard-style Karate in some cases.
As far as overall teaching style, Hatsumi-sensei encourages improvisation and adaptation. All of the good teachers, who trained with him regularly, had a very practical outlook on what we were doing. I’ve seen some of the ideas that we were dealing with almost 20 years ago coming out in the practically oriented systems that are getting popular now, and we were dealing with mixed martial arts ideas before MMA really got started. Hatsumi would often say things like, “Of course no one carries a sword around any more, but you can do the same movement with a kitchen knife, or an umbrella or something.”
He’s way different from most traditional Japanese martial arts teachers, and his style of training, which trickled down to my teacher, frankly spoiled me. I’ve found most of the other martial arts I’ve done in Japan to be lacking since they do nothing but rote repetition, almost no adversarial training, and some of the situations have become so stylized that the meaning behind them is lost. There is no “good guy” or “bad guy” in most of the Bujinkan scenarios. You try the technique and your training partner will try to help you get it, but if you screw up, his next bit of “help” will most likely be something painful that he was able to do because of your mistake. You learn what works and what doesn’t pretty darn fast that way.
Training at the Hombu-dojo usually consists of Hatsumi doing something, showing a couple of variations that might happen because the parameters are different each time, and maybe offering a comment or two on what your focus should be. Then he’ll almost inevitably say, “Understand? Play!” and off we go. Going to train with him directly is like going to a high-level college lecture class. You do a LOT of homework on your own trying to figure out what you were just taught, and he doesn’t do a lot of review.