Bill Clinton's penis a lock to move back into White House?

I for one hope The First Lady-Mans’ penis is thoroughly satisfied whether his ball and chain becomes Prezzy or not.

If that’s the good shit, I’d hate to see the bad stuff!

No, they don’t usually do it to me. The point is that Bill used to do it pretty regularly. There was a whole ongoing drama about it. I’m surprised you don’t remember. Slept through the 1990’s in a heroin haze, did you? I suppose Bill Clinton’s penis is counting on voters like you.

Well, see, I remember the scandals. But I don’t think that was his exact approach…

Nonetheless, for famous/rich/powerful men like that, they certainly don’t have to work very hard for it. So if that’s what your point was supposed to be, fair enough.

I think it’ll be hilarious as Bill Clinton discovers how the sexual attractiveness of being the First Husband compares to that of the President’s.

There are many valid reasons to vote against Mrs Clinton. If you think her husband’s behavior should be added to the list, you’ll have to explain why. Or at least give us a hint.

I remember the 90’s. It was a whole different millennium. You seem strangely haunted by Bill Clinton’s Penis. Have you been visited by the Ghost of Bullshit Past?

For values of “pretty regularly” that are what exactly?

CMC fnord

No.

She is if you guys plan to spend the next 11 months talking about Bill’s Penis.

Just because you’re a creep doesn’t make the rest of us “innocents.”

wait

Oh, I think [del]her husband’s [/del]the actual candidate’s behavior is a selling point if you’re a redpiller. Vote The Best Wifey Ever into the White House, and show all those Tumblrinas that powerful, studly guys who know how to dominate a bitch always come back in the end.

But, hey, if you want to pretend this campaign is feminist, well, that’s adorable. Go on believin’, and stop readin’.

[Feel free to close the browser tab and make your master a sammich here.]

Notice how no Democratic woman is running for President who doesn’t owe her entire political career to her husband? Why is no woman like Kathleen Sebelius or Barbara Boxer challenging her? If the Democratic Party were out to fight Patriarchy, why only put up a transparent attempt to get Bill back in the White House? Why not a field of female candidates?

“But, but, Hillary Rodham Clinton has her own career!” I hear you sputter. No, not really. Her entire career has been riding on her husband’s status or his name. There is no her. Hillary Rodham doesn’t exist.

HRC is barely even a legal person. She’s a wife, an organ of her husband, a tool to get him back into power, Constitutional Amendments be damned.

There is no difference between a WJC Presidency and an HRC Presidency. Whichever of them was wearing the pants before will be wearing the pants again. So this is an endorsement and a vindication of the “crassness” of Clinton and the Clinton era.

So, by all means, ladies, vote for “Hillary.” But dudes, we know who’s in charge. :wink:

And it’s Bill Clinton’s penis.

Wow. I used to think you were just wrong about most things.

As a lifelong Democrat and someone who actually cares about fighting the patriarchy, I can assure you that “Fighting the Patriarchy” is not and never has been a priority of the Democratic Party.

But, by all means - do, please, keep talking about how Hilary is a nobody and a pathetic substitute for Bill’s Penis. That’s sure to bring all the girl voters to your yard.

Oh, I intend to! I’m campaigning for Bill Clinton’s penis as vociferously as I can until it either wins or drops out. But I’m pretty sure Bill Clinton’s penis is going to win, and all the dudebros will shout a hearty “Kiss It” to the hoes.

I was agreeing with you at this point. Then you sort of lost me.

I’m sorry. I thought the OP was a joke. I didn’t realize you were serious. So let me now give you a serious answer.

You have a deluded view of marriage. A woman does not become a mere appendage to a man by getting married.

This is true about women in general. And it is certainly true about Hillary Clinton in particular. She has never shown any sign that she is hiding in her husband’s shadow. If elected, she will serve as President in her own power and not as a puppet for her husband.

Wow, for a “Fighting Ignorance” board, we have some barely comprehensible yahoos here.

Maybe they’re just acting ignorant. To see if we’ll fight it.

Serious question here, has foolsguinea always been this nutty? With over 12,000 posts and a member since 2000, her name doesn’t stick out to me as one of the crazies.

Or is this just a parody of something?