Yes, your reading comprehension is perfect! I’m totally dismissing the personhood of all married women, and not just HRC’s political “identity.” I mean, obviously, that’s why I mentioned women who were elected without famous husbands in that post.
No, please, tell all your girlfriends to ignore me. Oh, I’m a total sexist pig, don’t believe me when I say, it’s all about getting Bill back in.
You actually think Hillary Clinton is her own person? Like, with a career?
You’re so cute!
But, hey, whatever gets Bill Clinton’s penis back in the White House.
I just realized that I’ve been wrong to fight it. That HRC is the wave of the future, or the past, or something, anyway, it’s America, and America wants a Harassment and Rape Culture. Bill Clinton is the embodiment of male presumptuousness, and The Best Wifey Ever is the embodiment of the women who enable it. Who am I to tell fifty million horndogs they’re wrong?
Let’s welcome Bill Clinton’s penis back to the White House, and build an America where powerful men feel approved of for soliciting oral sex from random women! Yay!
I also would rather not see Bill Clinton’s Penis move back into the White House, but because I’m against nepotism in general, nothing to do with Bill Clinton’s Penis getting a blow job or two. However I would MUCH MUCH MUCH rather see Bill Clinton’s Penis in the white house than Donald Trumps Ball-sac.
BTW Foolsguinea, BillClintonsPenis.com is available for registration, you could be the proud owner of Bill Clinton’s Penis and post as much as you want about Bill Clinton’s Penis there to all the millions of Bill Clinton’s Penis fans all over the world.
I shant rest until there’s an America where all men feel approved of for soliciting oral sex from random women. Oral sex: Not just for rich people anymore.
Let me guess: in your heart of hearts you would have preferred that the impeachment trial had resulted in conviction, yes?
On the subject of relevance twenty years later, let me assure you that it’s not about giving the White House to WJC a third (and then fourth) time. It’s about withholding it from the Republicans.
And, for the record, I don’t subscribe to the notion that achieving that goal with HRC in 2016 represents any substantive setback to feminism in general (in case that’s what you’ve been suggesting).
No, I think we can all agree that it’s far more rational and appropriate that a woman whose entire political career was as an appendage of her husband’s notoriety (as distinguished from his penis’s notoriety, just to be clear) should be elected to his same office only because said husband “cheated on her.” The poor thing is owed that much, don’t you think?
I mean, it’s not like she knew and didn’t care! Or like he ran around like a young billy goat with her knowledge and assent! I mean, who would think, let alone suggest, that she had any idea?
No, clearly, no one has ever deserved that Oval Office chair more than poor, poor Mrs. Clinton, whose husband just couldn’t stop embarrassing her. It’s only fair.
Never! What a world we’d be living in, where a gentleman under the influence of the ultimate aphrodisiac would have to :shudder: control his manly urges! Wash your mouth out with soap!
But it’s really, really important that it be this candidate, this woman, too. And there’s a reason for that! There is no other woman who could be worthy of the mantle of “First Woman President.” Samantha Power? Barbara Boxer? What have their husbands ever done? It wasn’t President, I know that!
Someone like Senator Kirsten Gillibrand? She can’t even take a compliment! (That attitude’s not going to get you into the White House, young lady! Not that you could anyway; your husband’s a foreigner and ineligible to be President first. Are you even trying?) Now, if her colleagues had come on to Hillary Clinton that way, she would have appreciated it. *There’s *a woman who knows how to be grateful for male attention.
Of course not. No, nope, never. Real feminists don’t complain about unwanted sexual advances, they’re tougher than that!
No, it’s not essential that it be HRC. That’s just the way it turned out.
I’m sorry you feel her pathway to the Oval Office has been tainted and delegitimized by her association with the future First Bounder and Cad, but get a grip.
Maybe her entire quest for the presidency is so she can be caught having some pretty boy intern go pearl diving in her rose garden. Heels up on the resolute desk and everything. While on the phone with Putin, talking shop. Maybe work in a Caucasus or warm water port pun in there somewhere.
I think the point is that sexual predators don’t belong in the White House. Clinton isn’t just a guy who has affairs, he’s a guy with three complaints against him, one for rape, one for groping, and one for dropping trow as a sort of advance. At least Weiner had the courtesy to text his penis rather than taking girls into private rooms to do it whether they wanted it or not.
Does foolsguinea realize that if the appendage to Mr. Clinton’s penis does happen to get elected President, that it’s highly unlikely to be because of anything anyone on the SDMB did or didn’t do? It seems not.
Would foolsguinea care to drop a few hints as to who he or she thinks is an appropriate candidate for President from the current crop of mooks, fools, cads and bounders? It seems not.
When was Bill Clinton convicted? He’s gotten a lot of offers from interested women & appears to have said “yes” a bit too often. Some were scorned & made a fuss. Was foolsguinea one of them? Despite his peccadillos, Clinton was a pretty good president.
Hillary Clinton isn’t as liberal as I’d like–but she’ll do far better than any of the fools your party is throwing up to us. (Heh, I said “throwing up.”) Your desperation keeps getting more obvious…
