I would never date a man who hunts.
I would never buy a car without air conditioning.
I would never work at a job that had crosses, bible verses, or things of that nature on display.
…you?
I would never date a woman who can’t think for herself
I would never buy a computer from any company begining with the letter “T”
i would never work in a job where i can’t listen to music whilst i work.
I would never date a smoker
I would never drink a Pepsi if a Coke is readily available
hmmm i better add…
I would never date someone who prefers coke to pepsi
I would never date someone who insisted on watching sports on a weekly basis [I could cope with once in a while]
I would never date a Republican.
I should modify that… I could never have a live-in relationship with such a person. While dating, it actually wouldn’t matter.
I wouldn’t date anyone who exhibits personal rudeness or contempt for strangers.
I might work for them, though. Oh, wait. I have…all the time.
I would imagine the inclination and ability to hunt by your ancestors is part of the reason you are able to be here today sitting in a comfortable chair, propped up in front of a PC pontificating on what, until very recently, has been an essential and much admired element of being a provider for immediate and extended family, and more generally a successful human being.
To dismiss someone because they have developed a skill that offends your puffed up and errant sensibilities about what it really means to be human is unfortunate. Per your previously posts I considered you to be a person of some intellectual and emotional depth. The “dealbreaker” criteria you are listing are making you look as shallow as a puddle.
And your attempt to define what is and isn’t ‘acceptable dealbreakers’ reveals yours.
Yes, our ancestors hunted. Hallelujah. But there are a great many things that our ancestors did that we no longer do for economic or moral reasons.
easy astro - its only an expression of personal taste…
I would never date a democrat. (It was never meant to be, Twickster) 
If I was in the dating pool:
[ul]No smokers or heavy drinkers
No bigots
No dirty guys (I’m talking bad hygiene here)
No uber-fanatic of any kind - if you live for your team or your sport or your cause or your music, you obviously don’t have time for me.
No idiots.[/ul]
Well thats me out…
No fat chicks
No baggage
No ex boyfriends
No airheads
dang, stccrd, and I was just getting ready to throw myself at you…
Wow, Opal and I just might cause the universe to explode if we ever met.
I would never have dated anyone that doesn’t understand and embrace the intrinsic importance and beauty of all things ESPN.
No snobs
No party hacks
No earth mothers, tree huggers, etc.
No bigots (couldn’t agree more FCM)
No-one who reminds me of me
If hunters are so skillful, why do they need a big safety belt to keep them from falling out of trees?
Why do they have to get up at 3:00 a.m. to arrive at the deer hang-out before the deer do?
Why do they have to wear a big ol’ orange vest on top of their camoflauge, to keep from shooting eachother? Wouldn’t you get the same effect from no camoflauge at all?
Hunting is about buying as many items as you can, to confuse a gentle dim-witted animal.
Back to the OP:
If I were dating, I wouldn’t want anyone that disliked kids.
I wouldn’t date or be friends with anyone that tried to force their religious, or political views upon me.
So, you gonna ask her out
Wow, you don’t take rejection well. As someone who has hunted (and still will) and is not against it at all, I think you’re a bit full of yourself as a hunter. It’s currently unneccessary for the survival of most of the population and simply recreation or sport, and she doesn’t care for it…big deal. Maybe her ancestors were all vegetarian farmers and fishermen. Most women want good providers, but maybe not so much in the area of venison and coyote hides anymore.
Anyhoo,
I would say:
Romance Novel Readers
Talk Show Watchers
Someone with no life/mind of their own
Country music lovers
Anyone with more than 3 cats