Do you think Anders Behring Breivik is different than Muslim terrorists?

He is absolutely different than Muslim terrorists.

First off, he is much smarter than Muslim brothers.
Second, he did not cause the death of thousands.
Third, he has far more intellectual personality while compared to Muslim guys.

If there was sufficient amount of Breiviks, there would be peace in Middle East since all muslims would be annihilated.

Anyone who is from any Western country must admire, worship and praise him regardless of what it may cost. He is new prophet of Western World.

He murdered innocent people, including children. That’s always wrong. His desire for a “glorious” death in battle is pretty similar to the “martyrdom” that many Muslim terrorists seek. I think he’s the lowest scum, and/or has serious problems with his brain.

What’s “a sufficient number”? A hundred million? And do you think that, if western terrorists were running around killing Muslims, the remaining Muslims wouldn’t fight back? (Including those in South Asia and Southeast Asia.) This would not be the road to peace in the Middle East.

What’d he kill, 77 kids? What a hack! Dude’s not fit for the all-star team, yet alone the hall of fame.

(is this guy for real?)

He didn’t even kill Muslims, so more of his type would only end up wiping out the population of Norway.

Or is this a DNFTT moment that I missed?

What makes you think this? Many Islamic terrorists are well educated. All of the pilots of September 11th were college educated. Mohammed Atta had a degree in architecture. Osama bin Laden had an engineering degree. The two men who tried to bomb Glasgow airport were a medical doctor and a PhD student in computational physics.

Breivik, as far as I can find had no education beyond high school.

Whatever it is, it is IMHO certainly not worth engaging. I’m going to be disappointed if this thread ends up running to hundreds of posts and cluttering up the front page of GD for weeks.

Shit like this makes Baby Jesus puke His little guts out.

Actually even that overstates things.

He’s a high school dropout who gained much of his understanding of the world from Wikipedia.

May one inquire…seriously now, I’m truly curious…as to just how the OP came across this message board? Did you Google some off the wall question and have it match one of Cecil’s columns? What led you to us?

As much as Wikipedia needs to be taken just as a place to start and not to just an end your searches, I will have to defend them a little here, in his infamous manifesto Breivik also reported that he did the killings because the believed that the environmentalist left was following the climate scientists that were involved on a conspiracy to fake human caused global warming, that is the so called Climategate, that has been investigated many times and the researchers exonerated many times already and the science validated (yes it is warming, and humans are a big reason why).

Wikipedia has been actually been accused (well, mostly it has been just whine and howling) by deniers of not letting them push their sorry ideas in the encyclopedia and if Breivik had actually relied on Wikipedia he would had learned already how unreliable the right wing sources, that he must had relied for information on that subject, really were and are.

This can only end well.

I dunno, anyone who gets angered by such obvious provocation is a doofus. At most, the OP deserves mockery and dismissal.

lulwut

This appears to be an effort to promote or show approval for genocide. That sort of thing, (actually, your entire post praising a murderous nutcase), comes across as an effort to simply rile people up.

I am stopping short of accusing you of trolling, but you would do well to tone it down quite a bit.
[ /Moderating ]

It’s weird that someone with a Turkish name would advocate genocide of Muslims.

I guess at this point I’m not surprised to see such views are considered acceptable here at the SDMB.

My post wasn’t to criticize wikipedia(though I obviously think it’s horribly misused and given far more validity than it deserves) but to show how Breivik portrayed himself

http://www.salon.com/2012/04/19/breivik_product_of_the_internet/

(bolding mine)

Now I don’t think that wikipedia was anymore responsible for him murdering 77 people in Norway than the Quran or various* ahadith* were responsible for the destruction of the Twin Towers but there’s no question that Muhammad Atta saw himself as being inspired by and guided by them.

Similarly, Breivik said that of wikipedia, though like Atta, he was quite selective on what he chose to support and what he chose to ignore.

How can the calling for genocide not be viewed as trolling?

Would it be considered acceptable for someone to make a thread advocating the firebombing of Jewish elementary schools throughout the country or calling for the mass lynchings of “uppity niggers”?

When the person doing so actually means it.

Well, really, whats the difference? We are exposed to these insane notions as it is, yes? Whether these ideas are reported second-hand, or presented by someone who claims to believe them, we exposed to the same mind virus hazard. It is my opinion that resistance to mind viruses increases with exposure.