Drew Barrymore's Golden Globes Look: Fug or Fab?

Drew Barrymore’s Golden Globes look has gotten a lot of attention. The girls at Go Fug Yourself hated it and thought she looked like a crazy lady who was shot out of a cannon. The Project Rungay boys thought she looked like Angie Dickinson.

I have to admit, I love the dress. Beautiful color, elegant style, well fitted. The hair was just this side of too poofy. I see what she was going for, but it got a little out of hand. I applaud her for having fun with it, though. Too many of the looks were either cliche, or boring, or both. If it was just a little bit more restrained, I think it would have looked retro and awesome instead of like she was kind of on a bender.

What do you think?

Note that the Project Runway boys are, er, a but light in their pumps, so to speak. I’d do her sideways.

Okay, the hair is a bit too poofy, but the hair spray relaxes by morning.

My husband and I both declared it, “Marilyn Monroe by way of Courtney Love.” It looks like she was going for Romantic Elegance, and missed it by thismuch.

The dress actually looks pretty good in that still, but in motion it didn’t move well, and the top looked like it was about to pull a Janet Jackson on her. It looked awkward, not graceful at all.

The hair reminded me of when my grandmother’s hairdresser takes out her curlers but hasn’t combed it out yet. Yuck.

I loved the jewelry and makeup though! Drew is adorable pretty much no matter what.

I think she looks cute, but I love Drew and can’t stand those backbiting bitches at Fug.

I think it works, and I think you’ll see she’s a bit of bellwether. Keep this in mind when the Oscars air.

The hair is too big, but she doesn’t look fugly.

I love it. shrug

Just going by the photo it looks like one of the more decent things I’ve seen being worn by a Hollywood type to a ceremony. But I haven’t seen it in motion so perhaps that could change.

The dress was pretty, but the hair looked wretched and ruined the effect.

She looked like a crazy bag lady who stole a nice gown.

In motion, she was acting like a total ditz/drunk, which didn’t do much for making a good impression.

Yeah, it’s just one pic, but I think it’s the best one I’ve ever seen of her. She’s a knockout right there.

My initial reaction was that her hair looked terrible.

I loved the hair BUT I understand why others might not. I actually thought “THAT’s the hairstyle she ought to wear if she ever does her Barbarella project.”

Sideways, forwards & backwards.

I’ll get the warning page here at work if I click the link, but from what I remember the dress was nice but the hair looked like she had gotten fucked in the limo on the way over.

Boyfriend and I both thought she was stunning. Actually, I think she was the best dressed woman there. I don’t remember her hair being quite that large, though.

That’s it! It was her decision to fuck instead of getting the comb-out that did her in!

Another vote for seriously ugly.

(Just out of curiosity – do the people who don’t think it’s ugly remember the '60s firsthand? I think it’s easier to see the attractiveness of extreme 'dos if you didn’t live through the era firsthand.)

I think she looks great. Ditsy and fun loving look IMO and very sexy.

In a red carpet interview with Jessica Lange at her side she mentioned that they were there promoting their upcoming HBO film Grey Gardens (about, I believe, crazy rich ladies) and my thought at that moment was “Oh that explains the hair”.

I really like the dress itself, and like it on her.

I thought it was the best she has ever looked.

In fact, I thought everyone at the GG looked great. Everyone was stunning, or just shy of it. No one looked bad… IMO. Maybe I missed some folks? I’ll go check out some stills and see if my opinion changes.

LOVE the dress. Take the hair in an inch and polish it up a bit, and I’d probably love it, too. But yeah, that’s a little too big and too windblown.

Is it possible you didn’t see Renee Zellweger?