A slate of electors is not an individual elector.
wiki: Faithless electors in the 2016 United States presidential election
tl,dr version: seven faithless votes cast, one of them changed their vote, and two in Minnesota and Colorado had the elector replaced, and the vote recast.
If we want to get pedantic about it (and I want to, because it’s fun), a slate of electors {A, B, C and D} is different than a slate of electors {A, B, C and E}.
ACK! Yeah, I forgot all about the faithless five dem electors (and two rep?) in '16.
How would that square, though, with this Snopes thingie from a couple days ago, maintaining that:
Any state’s legislature could, theoretically, pass a law setting out a new method for designating presidential electors other than popular vote. However, they would have enact such a law prior to Election Day; they could not retroactively change, or just disregard, their current laws to defy the will of voters. State election laws and regulations must be established and in place prior to Election Day — they cannot be improvised or instituted on an ad hoc basis after the fact. Otherwise, every presidential election would descend into chaos, with state legislatures controlled by one party refusing to appoint electors pledged to the other party’s candidate.
Am I reading the article right, or am I missing something? [Bear with me - a little slow at getting all this firmly sorted out for piece (heh - or lack) of mind.]
And just fuu-uuuu-uuuu-HUCK that creepier-than-thou Mark Levin tweet.
If you want to be pedantic fine.
The state’s slate of electors includes replacements in case they are needed if the state’s rules allow for such a thing. So they send slate {A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H} (as an example…I don’t know all the details). Only {A, B, C, D} get to vote unless one (or more) breaks the rules and an alternate takes their place. There is no time to phone home and have another one sent. They are all sent at the same time.
So, one slate even if an individual gets removed and an alternate put in. Lile a relief quarterback. They are on the team roster. They travel with the team but they don’t usually get to play.
But…but…he’s the Alpha Male to end all Alpha Males! Mr. Macho personified! Ever hear of Arnie, Sly, Dolph? Wimps
Will Biden’s Immortality Ceremony, the one where he eats babies, be televised?
Probably, but because he will have raised property taxes so high that we will all be homeless, chances of us being close to a working TV when it happens are pretty slim.
Its now pouring rain. This is a wonderful start for what Biden has achieved! Yeah, I know that he had nothing to do with it, but with everything else suddenly so hopeful, rain during a drought is just the cherry on the sundae.
Can someone explain why Chump is refusing to concede? He says there will be lawsuits. Can he DO that? Will he have to be shoved out of the White House?
He’s a NY real-estate developer. This is his first offer. He’ll push to get his first offer accepted, or as near as he can get, or the best he can get. If he can’t make it deal, he’ll try to get compensation or a payout. If he can’t get a payout, he’ll say that it was somebody else’s fault anyway: his next deal (2024) is gonna make you rich.
as an example…I don’t know all the details
Sigh.
You’d think Mr. “I Like Being Pedantic Because it is Fun” would say more. Guessing you got nothing.
How about you go and find out all the details and come back and tell us all about it. Until then, maybe stop pretending you do know all about it, and being pissy when your misstatements are pointed out.
Bush Jr. was a lousy president but I always thought he was a good person. He can be lumped into the “Jimmy Carter” presidential bin. His father was even better.
You’re the pedant.
Also, I see no need. What will that detail change from what I posted? (Nothing)
You got called out and your attempts to dig yourself out are weak.
You’re wrong. You know it. We know it.
If you are right…prove it.
Bush Jr. was a lousy president but I always thought he was a good person.
Good people don’t start stupid pointless wars.
Your argument remains pathetic. If you want to continue to make misstatements, have them pointed out, and remain ignorant of why you’re wrong - feel free to continue. I’m not interested in serving as your personal tutor. You’ve provided plenty of positive contributions to this and other election-related subjects that I’ve enjoyed - but your refusal to acknowledge misunderstandings and errors is obnoxious and really detracts from the rest of the board.
I apologize to everyone else that’s been subject to this ridiculous hijack. I won’t be engaging in it any further - though I will certainly silently chortle at whatever WaM thinks he needs to retort with.
Its now pouring rain. This is a wonderful start for what Biden has achieved! Yeah, I know that he had nothing to do with it, but with everything else suddenly so hopeful, rain during a drought is just the cherry on the sundae.
Do you seriously mean that it’s raining right now where rain is needed, while here where we currently don’t need it we’re having a week of lovely warm dry weather?
Miracles indeed! – maybe just as the 60’s were actually roughly 1963-1973, 2020 was actually November 2019 through October 2020, and now it’s over??
but your refusal to acknowledge misunderstandings and errors is obnoxious
Pot, meet kettle. ![]()
This has been argued ad nauseum. I’ll just say it doesn’t prove that he’s not a good person, just flawed like the rest of us.
Bush did not make a mistake that anyone might because they are human. The drive to war was willful, intentional and they purposely mislead the American public and congress. Not one oopsie…a many months long effort.
That’s more than saying no one is perfect can cover.