Here’s a late-in-the-game case I made against a Scum Mahaloth in Random Mafia. Note the part I bolded and underlined . Where you built a weak case against a Scum buddy. Which you later used to point out your Towniness.
And now, here in this game, you’ve made a case against someone who appears to be Scum. A case that was in no danger of succeeding. A case where you cannot back up the fact you used (that Telcontar acted like he did before as Scum)
See, your case is a good one, only it didn’t point to Telcontar, it points to you!
Maybe we have different definitions of handwaving. To me, handwaving is dismissing comments made by others with a quick little comment and without directly responding to the case.
No, granted, I didn’t create a numbered list of my points in my case agsint you. I can do so. Here you go
Your participation in the game is extremely low. I’m not talking about post numbers, but I am talking about contributing to finding Scum.
Your post where you snuggled everyone except Meeko and even went so far as to pass judgment (albeit limited) on our confirmed Town players without so much as mentioning their confirmedness is the sign of either extremely apathetic Town or slightly bumbling Scum.
You comments on Day 1that you weren’t pinged at all by peeker and Meeko and thought Scum might be picking on them was almost immediately followed by the assertion that one of Chronos and peeker are likely Scum and a vote on peeker.
Your comments on Day 2 bemoaning low participation despite your own low participation seem like Scum just commenting to make comments.
Your pointing out that you voted for Tom on 3 Days (before his claim) usually fails to mention that you unvoted him twice to vote for Town players. It also fails to mention that he was in no danger of being lynched any of those Days as the vote on the lynch leader compared to him was 8-0, 7-4, and 10-1 on each of those 3 Days. NEW Your constant of how you voted for Tom before he claimed in your defense (see posts 1042, 1133, 1179, and 1285 before Tom’s claim and posts 1303, 1361, 1984, 1409, and 1445 after Tom’s claim)
Your defense that borders on ‘scum wouldn’t do this’ in post 1361 and 1384 that fails to address any points against you.
There, is that better?
Now, turnabout is fair play, so I think In reading your vote post for me, I can summarize your case thusly:
Ed seemed Town, heck Mahaloth even agreed with his build your case on yourself, but now sees how that could be Scummy.
Ed and Drain are likely Scum.
Mahaloth need to vote
Mahaloth voted for Tom!
I’m still willing to lynch Drain though.
I’m sure I may have missed points you made in other posts, so feel free to clarify that for me.
In the meantime, if a case ever deserved a handwave, that’s it. Hell, you didn’t even take the time to ‘me too’ all the work Drain did.