I must admit that I can’t tell whether this is the case or not. And, to play devil’s advocate (as I am wont to do on many occasions) I have to say that I could interpret this situation in her favor. That is, your style of writing can be (trying to be nice here) somewhat incoherent at times. I know your method fits in well with your brand of humor, but perhaps it does not work as well in anything that resembles a debate, as this does.
By no means do I wish to disparge you; rather, I would ask what you would do if confronted by arguments presented in a manner you did not care to decipher. I hate to pick on a poster in particular, but bj0rn is the ideal one to examine. I do not wish to compare your posts to his; only to give you a sample of what others might see in your posts. (Putting yourself in the other’s shoes, as it were.)
You may find some of the posts in this thread relevant to our discussion. (And make sure to note bj0rn’s post.)
I am not extreme in the position I hold. Cranky lined it out very well, and I should have stopped there, and yeah, my style serves better for humorous purposes.
And, I hate it when I get like this on a thing.
So, this’ll be my last post in this thread.
Couple things- I don’t know if C3 really knows how offensive her remarks are about the differences between people with problems and assholes. I will not take the time to delve into it.
re: The reason I started this goddamm thread in the first place-
Who, in anybodies opinion, did the most to further their cause- Malcolm X, or The Good Doctor King?
Who, if you had to choose, would you say is more admirable to be like-
Scotticher, or me?