When I first heard this mentioned, I thought Seth McFarlane was just screwing with people, but it’s mentioned seriously in a few places.
I have to wonder what they can do with it. If Cleveland still interacts with his usual friends, does it simply become Family Guy 2? Or do they throw him into a totally new situation?
Read this on Slashdot a few days ago. Seth McFarlane must have photos of Rupert Murdoch in bed with Hillary Clinton to be able to get such a stupid concept greenlighted.
Yea, I don’t really see the point of a third show involving a cartoon family in suburbia. If he wants to try another show, he should do something different and original, like a cartoon comedy set, say, a thousand years in the future spoofing various sci-fi shows/movies/books/whatever. Yea, thats the ticket.
There’s actually a show just like that already called Futurama. What Seth should do is turn that concept on its head by making a cartoon about a family living in a cave in pre-historic times, with dinosaurs and other extinct creatures, and the big joke is that they’re just like a regular family from today!
I’m not quite that far in agreement, but I do think that both FG and AD have an ugly, misogynistic streak running through them. I also find Peter’s abuse of Meg to be so unfunny that when an episode includes it, it destroys my enjoyment enough that I generally turn off the show.
Nope - aside from the odd phrase from Stewie, I find it groan-inducingly awful.
In fact, when I first saw this thread title, I figured it would be all about how some guy who wasn’t funny at all managed to get a third show on the same network.