Yes, you did.
(bolded emphasis mine)
Yes, you did.
(bolded emphasis mine)
If you’re under the impression that I’m his sock, you can ask the mods. They’re certainly able to backtrack IP addresses and can say that I’m not.
I’m posting from Rhode Island and while I don’t know where Finn is posting from, I doubt it’s Rhode Island.
It seems that our resident Israel Bashing Brigade doesn’t like the fact that the board (finally) has an intelligent, educated, knowledgeable poster who’s a strong critic of Israel, but who’s able to participate in rational debates and objects to bullshit as much as I do.
Evidently their only responses are calumny about how everybody gets called an anti-Semite or nonsense about how you must be my sock (or as Damuri demonstrated, that you really must not be critical of Israel, really).
It’s… interesting.
Yeah, I guess sarcasm is beyond you. Because otherwise, I had to have been talking about a guy with shit on his shoe, a guy with shit on his underwear, and so on.
Wait. Aren’t you the guy who likes to imagine that women are making false rape accusations all over, which is totally not sexist at all?
And aren’t you also the guy who’s said that he knows more about racism than black people do, unless they’re just as much of a scholar as he is? You keep dodging that question, I notice.
Ah, good, the “Duh! I was being sarcastic… and then when you pointed out that wasn’t the sum total I went crazy(er) rather than saying “oh yeah, I was being hyperbolic”, and then when you asked me to reign myself in I went full retard” defense.
It’s true what they say, the best defense is batshit, raving offense.
No, that’s you being insane again. By the way, because you’re out of your mind, you denied that false reporting ever happens at all. Of course it does happen, and we don’t have firm numbers for the actual incidence (for obvious reasons). And as another example of your disconnection from reality and tendency to imagine sexism hiding behind every corner, even if someone did believe, as a certainty, that there’s a high rate of false-reporting, that’s not sexist. At all.
At least, not any more than “there’s a lot of insurance fraud” is a deeply misanthropic position. :rolleyes:
In point of fact you cheapen the actual meaning, and problem, of sexism when you misuse the term to mean “thinking that certain criminal accusations may be false.”
You’re just nuts.
Actually, again, this is a very good example of the fact that you are literally an insane person who has no connection with reality. You’re reading and responding to things that don’t actually exist.
On some level you have to realize that being off your meds is a bad thing, and you have to realize that you’re being insane because right after you claim I’ve ever said such a thing, you admit that really what happened is that I didn’t answer your silly question about it.
On some level you have to realize that the mental illness you suffer from has overcome you. Hopefully you’ll get back on your meds.
Meh. Ignore is easy enough when ‘reading’ lunatic rants – part and parcel of my rather expansive SDMB experience. No need for software help.
Kind of a ‘tastes great’/‘less filling’ debate. Though it’s obvious he shoots his wad on each and every post, it’s his keyboard to do as he pleases…
Only Jackmannii is enough of a Finn sycophant (excluding imaginary friends) to stick around to support Finn in the 10th page of his pitting. You go, Mini-Finn. (But wipe your nose, please. It’s sorta disgusting.)
For those curious of the context, by the way, inyet another thread where Spoke was JAQing Off about a possible Jewish Menace (this time a cabal of Jews who control Hollywood and who should be sued, just in case there’s any evidence that they actually do discriminate against anybody), DSeid pointed out that:
After that, Spoke accused DSeid of “Jewish supremacism” (a phrase he totally didn’t borrow from David Duke). Spoke then, of course, made a rather limp nonpology, stating that he was sorry he accused DSeid of being a “bigot”, but even then blaming other people for his comment and said nothing about his accusation of “Jewish supremacism”.
Later, even more bizarrely, Spoke went on to claim that what DSeid had really been doing was:
Quite an odd mistake to make, consider that DSeid’s actual words were
Very strange that Spoke would see a claim of limited achievement in certain very particular venues as something that lets Jews " rise to the top of every field", and a claim that cultural factors were really “the innate superiority of Jews”, and that all that amounted to (not David Duke’s phrase, not David Duke’s phrase) “Jewish supremacism”.
Luckily Spoke was a mensch and was kind enough to take DSeid’s at his word that he wasn’t one of those nasty Jewish supremacists. You know, like the ones who maybe but don’t definitely undermine the US government in order to betray the nation to foreign powers, and against whom we must be ever vigilant.
You mean the thread where I said this?
I say “tomato” you say “cabal” I guess.
But what does any of this have to do with your new imaginary friend?
Spoke, how many of your fellow racists do you know who come right out and say that they’re racists? You are a racist conspiracy theorist who’s worried about Traitor Jews in the US government and a Jewish cabal in Hollywood, you’re constantly Just Asking Questions about the Jewish Menace. Even in the other thread, you pretended that you were some sort of disinterested observer, and just wanted to sue those damned Hollywood Jews, ya know, to make sure. Except the cite you provided to show how that was a good idea actually showed that the people who brought a claim like that court were made to pay the legal fees of the defendants. Just like you claimed that whether or not a Jewish cabal was ruling Hollywood could been seen by using the UK’s film industry as a “control”, and yet when it was revealed that Jews were also overrepresented there, you somehow changed the subject very quickly.
And all of that, naturally, ignores your parroting of David Duke’s terminology and your bizarre Conspiracy Theory about Jewish supremacism whereby you actually misread a claim about cultural factors providing a relative advantage in limited fields as a claim of innate Jewish superiority in absolutely all fields. You never did answer just how that happened, what with your witch hunt for Jewish Supremacists and Traitors Jews in the US government, and all.
Of course you can’t answer on the facts, you’re a conspiracy-theory addled racist. So instead you try to change the subject to the fact that, sure you were describing and alleging a cabal based on no actual evidence other than your irrational fear of Jews, and contradicted by a mountain of evidence and logic, but you were (you think) clever enough to use a different term. So it’s totally cool.
Your denial is worth nothing, nor is the ever-so-clever obfuscation you use to hide your accusations of a Jewish cabal.
You’re like any garden variety racist who says “Blacks are less intelligent, less hard working, less honest, more prone to crime and drugs, and less committed to stable families than white people. What’s that? I did not use the word inferior. What’re you, a paranoid?”
Or as I pointed out:
What’s the world coming to when you can’t even spin conspiracy theories about a Jewish cabal, while being clever enough to avoid that specific word, without some damn Jew taking offense?
Hey, dumb fuck, does insurance fraud overwhelmingly happen with one gender attacking the other? And DO give me a cite where I said women don’t lie. Do men lie? Do YOU lie? Based on your exchange with Villa, I’d say the answer to the question, “Do you lie,” is yes, because she had you dead to rights.
Oh, shit, that’s right. It’s Finn I’m talking to here. You lie like you breathe, as Villa so ably showed, and if I’m mistaken in thinking I stumbled over your drivel elsewhere, it means that there’s somebody else obnoxious with a very similar name and syntax. But you didn’t answer directly, did you? You just hurled more of your tedious insults.
So we’ve never encountered one another on another board, is that what you’re saying? Never. I want that clear. That’s what you’re saying. No “Hurr durr you’re nuts,” sidestepping.
Oh, no, you’re not nuts at all. We get it; you’re surrounded by anti-Semites.
Oh, you can lie about what I’ve written, and try get me to play defense, but nuh uh. This thread is about you. And you, sir, are fucking nuts.
I think my earlier diagnosis stands: Asperger’s Syndrome:
Naturally, you’re lying. While you and RedFury are undeniably anti-Semites, that doesn’t mean I’m “surrounded”. Of course, the reason you’d want to lie and claim that I’m alleging that lots of other people are anti-Semites is obvious. “Ah-hah! You called me and one other person an anti-Semite, and then only based on blatantly anti-Semitic things we said. You are obviously a crazy person who thinks that he’s surrounded by anti-Semites… oh yeah, and you’re autistic!”
You poor stupid racist asshole.
Just as obvious is the reason you changed the subject from your actual claims of a Jewish cabal controlling Hollywood to the detriment of gentiles, and your actual JAQing Off about Traitor Jews in the US government, and your actual hunt for “Jewish supremacists” whereby you thought that DSeid’s statement about cultural factors and limited venues of success was “Jewish supremacism” and “bigotry” and that it was a claim that Jews are innately superior in absolutely every possible field. Talking about that would be difficult, as what type of a creature you are is pretty obvious, especially if you try to defend your racism rather than handwave it away. So instead you’d prefer to change the subject with a lie about how I think I’m “surrounded by anti-Semites”.
It’s also rather played-out for you to lie in order to claim I’m lying. Very meta, but ultimately boring. Your words don’t vanish, and as I linked them and quoted them, what you’re trying to do is rather obvious when you claim that your own quoted words are a “lie”.
Anyways, enough of your antics, you silly little racist. Despite all the hate in your black little heart, Jews will continue to be successful in this country and won’t be sued for being successful in an industry or subjected to Jewish-only loyalty oaths in order to participate in politics. Deal with it, bitch.
Anyways, on to Margin’s insanity:
What I’m saying is that you are a raving, paranoid crazy person. One thinks you’d have understood it by now, as you keep quoting me pointing out the fact that you’re literally an insane person. At the point where you’re imagining that I’m somehow stalking you across multiple boards on the internet, *even someone as unhinged as you are should realize that it really is time to start taking your meds again. *
I’m sure that Obama also doesn’t answer your letters demanding to know if he’s really a space alien or only a sapient jellyfish. This is perhaps a sign that Obama has confirmed your worst fears by ignoring your lunatic-spew *Or it’s a sign to start taking your meds again.
*
Yes, that’s because you’re literally mentally ill and cannot perceive reality. Villa was caught lying about multiple subjects, and Villa is actually nearly as insane as you are. No mean feat, that.
For instance, she actually went berserk because I asked for a link to a source, and her response was to shriek about how I was a lying prick, or something…for wanting a link. Later she claimed that something was not the legal definition of rape, after which I provided two states in which it is indeed the legal definition. Then, after raging and shrieking about fictional “dishonest editing”, she edited out the entire half of a definition I provided talking about consent, and claimed I’d ignored the issue of consent. Then she tried to play Lawyerball and pretended that when I explicitly talked about using force or the threat of force to make someone do something, that that too wasn’t addressing consent. When, of course, anybody not out of their mind understand that forcing someone to do something while they are physically, actively resisting or saying 'Do this or I will kill you" are not, in fact, examples of someone consenting to do something of their own free will.
But as you are a lunatic, you think those’re all examples of me lying.
Since you are a crazy person, you probably missed that I pointed how estimates of insurance fraud are not an indicator of misanthropy, not misandry. You are a lunatic who sees sexism lurking behind every shadow, so the fact that people question the rate of false reporting among your pet-crime makes you freak out and start imagining sexism.
Is this like your bullshit about “sum total” before you claimed you were really joking, har har, hah hah, he he? As you are both a crazy person and a liar, readers should probably note that I did not claim you said women never lie, I correctly stated that you’re out of your mind, and that in response to the fact that it is proven that there is a non-zero probability of false reporting, you called it “making things up”.
Okay, margin and Spoke, the fight with Finn in fun… but really, you guys are no good at the quote editing. You just don’t have the style SFG brings.
Eh. It’s a boring bit of trolling when SFG does it. It just shows that spoke and margin aren’t original or creative in their stupidity. It’s a defense mechanism, I guess. If margin has the fact that she’s mentally ill pointed out and spoke has the fact that he’s a racist pointed out, since they can’t refute facts all they can do is try to draw attention to the accusations themselves and desperately hope that idiots reading along won’t notice that they’re factual.
Dear Og, he’s still at it!
Well at least his imaginary friend has piped down. (A Muslim imaginary friend, too! Nice touch!)
He never answered either my or Villa’s questions, he just, well, shrieked, to use his own unique brand of projection. Screaming about how somebody’s nuts when they ask you a simple question doesn’t answer the question, and Villa’s got him dead to rights. I’ve simply encountered another person with a similar name and way of expressing himself and wondered if that were Finn. The fact that he reacts that way…Well.
No, you’re lying yet again. Just like you’re lying that Villa had me “dead to rights” despite the multiple errors/lies that she built her shrieking on. Errors I just pointed out to you and which you either ignored because you’re a liar or, more likely, did not comprehend because you are simply out of your mind. As for Villa’s “question”, I provided the information to answer villa’s shiekfest even before she responded to a request for a link by going ballistic and saying that was ‘dishonesty’ and that asking for a link was a “prick” thing to do. And as you are a shrieking lunatic who’s evidently paranoid enough to think I’m stalking you across multiple message boards, well…
Naturally, as you are not only a shrieking crazy person but also a liar, your original claim was that I’d said something that of course you couldn’t cite, as it was born if the damaged, paranoid raving of your psychosis. To defend your nonsense, you then imagined some paranoid fiction about being stalked across the Internet.
Claim ‘projection’ all you want, but pointing out the fact that you are mentally ill is hardly beyond the pale. Likewise, as your response to things like “allegations are not factual and should be investigated” is “Sexist!!!” and you view it as perfectly normal to shriek accusations like “you’ve been stalking me across the net , haven’t you?!? Admit it and don’t you dare dodge this question!!”, you are quite obviously a shrieking, insane, idiot.
Seriously though, you are a shriekg idiot lunatic. It’s just a fact. You have neither the intellect nor the sanity required to interact with reality. Hell, you spun out a paranoid accusation of being stalked across the 'net. And when your target replies that the accusation demonstrates that you’re a stone cold paranoid, you can’t even understand that your accusation has indeed been answered.
No joke, you are a hysterical person suffering from mental illness. Please start taking your meds again. Some part of you must realize how sick you are.