@Ann_Hedonia, excellent post.
There is a vast gulf between ‘not true’ and ‘unproved.’
Your assertions above allow you to overlook the significant amount of effort – much of it almost certainly criminal – expended by Trump and his cabal to prevent Mueller and Congress from looking for, much less obtaining, the evidence that may well have proved the criminality of Trump, Kushner and others. Giuliani’s actions are certainly part of that in the 2020 election.
It’s only now that investigators are belatedly able to pursue what was hidden from scrutiny for the duration of Trump’s term. From Rod Rosenstein’s restrictions on what Mueller and his team could investigate (nothing of Trump’s personal financial dealings) and charge (Mueller’s team were not allowed to overstep the DOJ OLC memo that a sitting president cannot not be indicted), to the Trump team’s failure to comply with lawful subpoenas for both persons and documents, all reasonable investigations were stymied at every turn.
I’m glad our current AG is not turning away from pursuing these long overdue investigations.
You know another thing that was recently confirmed by our intelligence agencies with a declassified report? That the Trump campaign did in fact actively collude with Russia to swing the 2016 election.
I pointed this out to you in another thread, where you claimed it was “old news.” Again the not-so-subtle framing of something as “old news,” when in truth, you argued vociferously in the moment that it was untrue. It wasn’t. It was simply unproved at the time. It’s proved now, though.
Something to think about.