I especially liked this remark from the Washington Post book critic:
Anyway I’m sure it’ll be a bestseller. As the CSM article pointed out Beck’s “Common Sense” was last year’s top selling book (which probably doesn’t speak well of the book buying public).
So does anyone here plan on reading it or know someone who plans on reading it.
Without knowing anything about the characters, I was almost ready to defend “a traditional chick-at-a-glance inventory” as representing the inner voice of an adolescent hipster-wannabe might think is cool, but I can’t do anything with “liberated chestnut curls framed a handsome face made twice as radiant…”
No, I don’t know anyone who plans on reading it. Do you?
Is their a precedent for pundits becoming successful novelists? I don’t mean successful in terms of getting people to publish their books, but making bestseller lists and/or getting generally good reviews.
OK, if you hired a team of writers to help you with a novel, you didn’t really write a novel, did you?
I think Newt Gingrich has written a few novels, but I don’t know how successful they’ve been.
And of course how can one forget “Those Who Trespass” by Bill O’Reilly?
I really like this review(linked to in the link above). But someone please, please tell me that the Star Wars bit is just made up. Oh my lord that is indescribably awful.
William F. Buckley had a successful career with his spy novels, many of which were highly acclaimed. Of course comparing Buckley to Beck, in terms of writing ability, mastry of language, and general intelligence is like comparing apples to, well, fucking morons.
I’m starting to realize that Glenn Beck really is a faux pundit like Stephen Colbert. He just doesn’t know how to telegraph that he’s joking and so everyone takes him seriously. That collection of quotes from Mediamatters are entirely too stupid to be meant earnestly. It’s entirely probable that this book is a joke like Colbert’s Tek Jansen adventures.
I don’t think you’ll find many of Beck’s critics here arguing that he’s sincere in his political statements. That doesn’t make those statements any less pernicious though. In fact, if he doesn’t believe what he’s saying, it’s downright evil to say it knowing the hatred and rage that it encourages. Yeah, it’s only an act. A disgusting, offensive act.
You may have a point about the book, though. It’s hard to imagine anyone not intending that passage as comedy. Unless, of course, he’s whack-a-doodle crazy.
Oh, I don’t disagree. If he was intending to telegraph that he was only joking, he should have picked up early on that people weren’t getting the joke and refined his behavior accordingly. He’s knowingly messing with people now.
The best thing to be said for this book is that the title alone might educate some part of the public about the Overton Window, an important concept in practical politics as well as political theory.
That’s the sad thing, that there are actually millions of people out there who consider this man a great thinker instead of seeing him for the overdramatic charlatan that he is. He’s basically just a shock jock who found his niche pandering to gullible right wingers.