Assuming you’re not just whoosing:
That’s just short for Priscilla. It’s NOT the origin of, nor related to, the adjective, prissy, which predates the film by at least a few decades:
Some people here are worth debating. Some are worth the time it takes to come up with coherent arguments designed to change minds and clarify issues. Some are capable of engaging in an interesting discussion. Others are here mainly as chew toys.
This is an insult to those of with dicks so long we keep tripping over them. I’ll be over here with the pocket lint waiting for a retraction.
Hey, man, if you can’t figure out how to swagger properly it ain’t my fault.
Eh, gonzomax is from Michigan - remember the PBB thing, where bad stuff got mixed in with Cattlefeed? It explains quite a bit about Michiganders IMHO.
Why are Michiganers eating cattle feed?
I was kind of surprised to see the kid character and Charlie Sheen’s character on Two And a Half Men refer to something as “gay” (in the sense of “lame”) last week.
Granted, they were talking about a show tune, but still.
We drank the milk that the cows who ate the cattlefeed produced.
He thinks it would be ironic if a poster with username that’s a euphemism for kitty started a thread about doggies. :dubious:
No, that was the comparison (“the only way it could be more ironic”). He apparently found something in the OP itself to be ironic. No idea what, though.
Va-jayjay=slang for vagina
fag=slur for one who has no use for the vagina and the reason this thread started
Okay, let’s look at the post in question.
“The only thing that could make the OP post more ironic” indicates to me that he considers my OP ironic to start with, without adding the extra letters to my username. Adding the extra letters would make it MORE ironic.
So what the hell did he find ironic in the first place?
I was just being silly.
I doubt there was an initial irony. He just wanted to call you a pussy for starting a thread about fag and fagified being offensive terms.
Forget it. Has any poster in the pages of this thread far stepped up and said anything like, “Hey, now - gonzomax isn’t really stupid. Let’s be fair.”
No. There’s some good natured back-and-forth about HOW stupid, or the cause of the stupidity, but no real refutation of the basic premise.
And for good reason.
In my view, your search for the “initial irony” can end on that note.
Only he’s not talking about gonzomax, he’s talking about billfish and his cryptic post. Billfish apparently thought something about the OP was ironic; dunno what, but I agree whatever it was is a mirage of some sort.
Maybe it’s ironic that a comment by Gonzomax could actually surprise and disappoint somebody who’s seen any of his other threads?
Well, that is certainly surprising…I’m not seeing the irony however. Now if gonzo actually broke out with a thoughtful, well reasoned and relatively well written and coherent post that would be…well, ok, it would be miraculous, to be sure. But THAT would be some irony I suppose.
Good thing there is little or no chance of that happening, ehe?
-XT
Grow up.
Little chance of that happening.
You know, when you defend the use of anti-gay slurs on the grounds that fifth graders do it, you’ve pretty much given up any right to tell other people to grow up.
'Struth.