LOL – of course she’s told lies in her life. You made a claim about a specific lie about pneumonia - a claim I called out as bullshit, and you still haven’t defended. Are you now retracting your claim that she or her campaign lied about her pneumonia?
I’m not going to go that far; I’ll just say I don’t see that he adds anything to the conversation. If you disagree, rather than provide a blind link, how about quoting one of his points that you find particularly salient, and explaining why?
Also sorry about misspelling your username.
So Trump announced he’d give the results of his physical on TV. Now he’s refusing to do so after seeing the actual results.
Will those claiming Hillary’s illness should cost her the election now admit that by their own standards, Trump should also be disqualified and/or that this should cost HIM the election?
Oh no no no, admit the truth. You weren’t going to vote for her anyway.
Not really the same thing. Hillary apparently has a long history of passing out, bloodclotting problems and a fairly recent concussion. Just because Trump doesn’t want to announce he has herpes and inoperable hemorrhoids doesn’t disqualify him.
Where did you read that? Got a cite?
Here is what I see: Donald Trump surprises Dr. Oz with results of recent physical
AFAICT, a lot of that concern was directed at the fact that McCain chose Sarah Palin as his running mate. Anyone who listened to her talk for more than ten seconds knew that she shouldn’t be anywhere near the presidency. McCain’s health was a greater issue because the next person in line would be an incompetent buffoon who was utterly incapable of doing the job.
Unlike McCain, Clinton has a solid backup. Unlike Clinton or McCain, Trump is himself the incompetent buffoon utterly incapable of doing the job. If Trump’s health is poor, it’s actually a point in his favor. But that’s no reason to choose him over Hillary.
It’s right in your own link title and the body of your linked article where he would have got that. Why the hell do you think it “surprised” Dr Oz? And your own article says
So presumably, having read your own cite,you knew perfectly well the answer to your question.
So, it says that the examination was done by the same doctor who told us that Trump would be the healthiest President evah! Certainly put to rest any suspicions I may have had! But why not Zoidberg?
(Did anyone else here see the perfectly charming movie, The Wrong Box? Michael Caine was young, this movie proves it! In it, Peter Sellers portrays Dr. Pratt, an utterly corrupt Victorian sawbones whom Peter Cook consults to get a pre-written death certificate. Mr Trump’s doctor does not have an examing room full of cats, but outside of that…
Also, its a heck of a good movie, cheerful, sweet, and funny. Joe Bob 'luc says, Check it out!..You probably need it…)
underlining mine.
Better recheck your facts there. You’re quite wrong again.
Looking back, I apologize – you don’t appear to have made a claim that Hillary lied about pneumonia. Though I’m not sure what I was wrong in the first place in order to be wrong “again” on. 
We’ll just agree that both of these candidates are truth challenged,
You buy the first round, I’ll get the second.
In the same way that Lake Wobegon and the Pacific Ocean are bodies of water, hence, comparable.
This bizarre post astounded me so much I actually clicked View All Posts By This User … and so much more of the same, and worse.
inscrutable, is it your claim that whites re oppressed in the U.S.A., that your life would be better if you got cosmetic surgery and could then pass for black, or brown?
Cite for Hillary’s racist, anti-white, rhetoric?
Sounds like typical alt-right posturing.
“Well I was going to vote for (Candidate) until X happened!”
Where they were never going to vote for (Candidate), they’re just making comments like this to put doubt in others minds. But you know, they sound more reasonable by suggesting that they were planning to vote for your person before this horrible thing happened to put them off such a sorry candidate…
Can you provide any other plausible explanation for why a Trump campaign picture would include such an unusual, specific image? If it’s not a shout out to the white supremacists, why on earth is it there?
Was it just an image of Pepe divorced of any context? As the Wiki on Pepe says, Pepe belongs to everybody. If the context was Pepe saying alt-right things, then they could have simply been scouring the web for an appropriate alt-right meme and used it without thinking further, just like they did with the other, less savory, hidden memes they had found in the past.
If it was just an image of pepe out of context then I have no clue what’s up with that.
“Dog-whistle politics is political messaging employing coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has an additional, different or more specific resonance for a targeted subgroup.”
From Know Your Meme;
Association with the Alt-Right
On May 26th, 2016, The Daily Beast[31] published an article titled “How Pepe the Frog Became a Nazi Trump Supporter and Alt-Right Symbol.“ The article included an interview with Twitter user @JaredTSwift,[38] identified as an “anonymous white nationalist,” who claimed there was a “campaign to reclaim Pepe from normies” by creating anti-Semitic illustrations of the frog character.
So the character was being identified with the alt-right months before the Clinton campaign mentioned it.
Now whether or not this is all true or bullshit, the fact is that the Clinton campaign did not invent this out of whole cloth.