Sometimes, Ordinary Spud, one is young, and does not know any better, and tends to think that if one did not have an orgasm it is one’s own fault, and not, say, the fault of the young man who may be engineering the orgasm or lack thereof.
Sometimes one has gotten into the wrong relationship and does not realize it until some sort of wham-bam-thank you ma’am has begun and one just wishes to get it over with.
Just sometimes.
If, along with my standard fee, there is a significant gratuity on the dresser, I assume the orgasm was real.
If the walnut I’ve secreted in her anus is cracked, I assume the orgasm was real.
You secrete walnuts? That’s got to hurt–for both parties I imagine. You might want to have that looked at. I’m pretty sure its not normal.
Make sure you’re with an honest woman.
se·crete2
tr.v. se·cret·ed, se·cret·ing, se·cret·es
I think the word you’re looking for may be “excrete”. Easy to confuse.
If you touch her clit afterwards, and she jumps about a foot into the air. Very sensitive afterwards, just like men.
I dunno, many types of orgasms, many different signs.
But, as a woman, I really have never understood the value of faking. Never have, never will. Counter-productive.
:dubious: One isn’t born with this kind of knowledge, you know. I mean, that it’s counter-productive. Sometimes it takes years and years to learn such things.
Except that men don’t have clits.
I’m guessing he was thinking:
Main Entry: 1se·crete
Pronunciation: si-'krEt
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): se·cret·ed; se·cret·ing
Etymology: back-formation from secretion
: to form and give off (a secretion )
Poor, poor, poor dear men. They don’t know what they are missing
And Anaamika, I understand what you are saying, I have had plenty of bad sex when I was younger. I just never wanted the guy to think it was great when it wasn’t.
Two wooshes from one post.
[Monty Burns]
Excellent!
[/Monty Burns]
BTW, thanks, Faerie Beth.
Don’t be so quick to pat yourself on the back!
I highly doubt either of us were “whooshed”. I knew you were most likely kidding. Still couldn’t resist answering straightforwardly.
Kiss her afterwards, with tongue. If her tongue feels cold, she had an orgasm. My wife taught me that trick years ago and is an absolute tell*. Not that she’s faking orgasms, …argh I’ve said too much already.
Two reasons spring to mind.
Either the woman just wants to get it over with or she has concern for her partner. Mens’ egos are somewhat fragile in such situations and we all like to think we are Casanova. Occasionally one or both partners may not be on their best game for any number of reasons and it just doesn’t get done. The woman still wants to be encouraging and not hurt the guy’s feelings so lets it slide.
Now, if the orgasms are faked with regularity then that is an issue and doing no one any favors.
As for spotting a fake it is usually pretty easy if you know the woman you are with (i.e. have been with her a number of times and have seen a few legitimate ones). At least if the guy is paying a reasonable amount of attention to the woman and not solely concerned with his own pleasure.
While some of the women here say how easy it is to fake out guys on this I tend to disagree. Most women do not put a lot of effort into a good fake-out and seem to think men are dim enough to be fooled by nothing more than some well timed moans. Just ain’t so unless the guy is a real cretin.
If it is a one night stand thing all bets are off…you probably won’t be able to tell.
A puddle is often a sign that an orgasm has occured.
What is this “female orgasm” you are all speaking of?
Yeah, but if you knew that “secreted” is the past tense of both “secret” and “secrete”, why even mention confusion with “excreted”?
Cite?
“Many publications of varying levels of critical scientific reliability have now been
published about the G-spot and female ejaculation and both have slowly achieved
some degree of acceptance.”
“The existence of continual female prostate secretion, with
recognition of prostatic components, including PSA, into
the urethra and the continual flow of small amounts of urine
from the urethra to the vagina under gravitation and the
ejaculation accompanying female orgasm (13) or sexual
arousal (10) provide a simple explanation of how the female
prostatic fluid with the PSA can get into the vagina. The
rhythmical coital movements and pressure of the male membrum
into the vagina provide for easy and fast attainment of
female prostatic components in the vagina. Consequently,
the continual (spontaneous) secretion and the ejaculation
discharging of the female prostate can be accompanied by
the occurrence of PSA and other female prostatic components
in the normal environment of the vagina.
On the basis of the foregoing, we cannot agree with the
validity of the vaginal PSA test as a criterion for the effectiveness
of condoms.”
It may involve a mixture of urine and some other things, but it certainly isn’t just urine.
Also, the women that I’ve been involved with that have demonstrated this trait frankly did so at a time-rate that I cannot imagine being voluntary but I’ll admit that it’s possible that a woman could fake them if she really wanted to. But I’m just guessing that women that think to fake orgasms with that level of knowledge, foresight, and planning might be sexually open enough to say, “honey, that really doesn’t do it for me.”
Oh, sorry, by the, “this trait,” in my final paragraph I meant the vaginal contractions/spasms, not the ejaculation.
Although if arguing from personal experience is also permissable, allow me to throw in a personal disagreement to your claim about female ejaculation.