I want to kill all people who have done illegal drugs

[Princhester]

Nah, bullshit, Bottledblondjeannie.

There are two options. We take the OP as a bit of a joke, in which case making fun of it is hardly out of order, or alternatively we take it seriously, in which case we are talking about a guy advocating the death of many people on these boards, in which case frankly com2kid deserves all he has got and more.

These boards are pretty robust and rigorous, and the pit (which is where we are) even more so. These boards are by and large reasonably polite to polite newbies. But someone who comes in with an OP like this? You’ve got to be kidding.

I’m pretty sure that com2kid knows that this is the kitchen, and it seems to me it is you, not him, that is complaining about the heat.

And we all know what that means you should do, don’t we?

[Mojo]

*Originally posted by SuaSponte *
**…So, the odds are that at least one of his parents had done illegal drugs.

Who you going to shoot first, Com2Kid? Mom, or Dad? **

When I read the OP, I guessed that his dad was William Burroughs. It seems that he’s inherited his writing style (or at least they’re equally coherent) but wants to rebel against the “dark side” of drugs that his father embraced.

Of course that means that he can’t kill mom.

[hardygrrl]

*Originally posted by BottledBlondJeanie *
**FUCK

I am embarrassed by most of you and pissed off–nice “Welcome to the Boards!”

Wasn’t aware there was a welcoming committee/procedure…

Alright, the OP was confusing, but obviously Com2 does not like drugs and he was making a case against them.

But 2 fucking pages of 95% “Dude, you must be high” comments.

Ok, in what language or universe was he making a case against anything? A strong case for Ritalin maybe.

You know, I know this is the Pit, and his OP was placed appropriately, but I don’t think a pile-on comparing him to the very thing he is ranting about is appropriate. NOT. AT. ALL.

How about just letting him rant, he wasn’t abusing any of you? Or at least try to address his points–he has tried to make them–that’s obvious…

Did you read the OP? I tried, I really did but for the love of god…put it this way, just for shits and giggles, I ran the instructions for my laptop through BabelFish. From English to French to German, back to English, then to Croatian to Cantonese to Gaelic and back to English. You know what? It was still more coherent and easy to read than the OP.

I am ashamed…

Wow, and after this thread that’s possible?

Com2 Welcome to the boards where if you don’t rant concisely and make salient points (judged by people who’s standards may be a bit too high and mighty) you get picked on and if you don’t spend 5 hours making sure that you have pretty post you get degraded.

Oh, so even though the board’s mission is to fight ignorance, we should ignore a streaming pile of it?

Not all of us are like this…

Can I have a show of hands? Who’s all for incoherence?

[bdgr]

*Originally posted by hardygrrl *
**
Can I have a show of hands? Who’s all for incoherence? **

Fish…

[OpalCat]

*Originally posted by bdgr *
**

Cite? You also have to consider the motives of those who “debunked” it. As for the motive of those who found it, it was discovered by a hardcore computer scientist who was looking to prove that HTML and VB did not exist at the same time. His life was forever changed by the discovery, although he was thereafter shunned by the computer scientific comunity. He now knows the inner peace and freedom, and you can too, Opal, if you just open your heart to the truth, and it will set you free. **

You know, I should have expected this kind of reaction. You’ve obviously been brainwashed and at this point it’s not even fun to disagree with you. If you could form a coherant argument that doesn’t rely on belief in a Higher Computing Power I might actually listen, but this stuff? Go write comic books, kid.

[non-native]

i like incoooheereeeannnnnanneneaceeeafasdf sa u goinga ta ate dat? An potatoe! no fish! potatoe~~1

On a more serious note…
hardygrrl Although I agree that the Pit isn’t the welcoming commitee, I don’t see why you had to bring up BottledBlondJeanie’s thread that is neither shameful or in any way relevant to the topic.

And can I know what com2kid’s been smoking? I want some.

[Tir_Tinuviel]

*Originally posted by bdgr *
**Quick, whats the differance between a duck? **

One of it’s legs is both the same as the other one?

[hardygrrl]

*Originally posted by non-native *
**

On a more serious note…
hardygrrl Although I agree that the Pit isn’t the welcoming commitee, I don’t see why you had to bring up BottledBlondJeanie’s thread that is neither shameful or in any way relevant to the topic.

. **

Must have been all the weed I’ve been smoking

[Fenris]

*Originally posted by OpalCat *
**

You know, I should have expected this kind of reaction. You’ve obviously been brainwashed and at this point it’s not even fun to disagree with you. If you could form a coherant argument that doesn’t rely on belief in a Higher Computing Power I might actually listen, but this stuff? Go write comic books, kid. **

Ahem…

You realize that HITLER AND STALIN were non-believers too?

DO YOU SUPPORT STALIN?

DO YOU?

True Believer Fenris

[pantom]

Reality is for those who can’t deal with drugs.

[bdgr]

*Originally posted by OpalCat *
**

You know, I should have expected this kind of reaction. You’ve obviously been brainwashed and at this point it’s not even fun to disagree with you. If you could form a coherant argument that doesn’t rely on belief in a Higher Computing Power I might actually listen, but this stuff? Go write comic books, kid. **

Kid? cool…Havent been called that in a decade or two.

Of course belief in high computing power requires belief in a higher computing power. How could it not.

But there are two many holes in computer scientist theorys of a world wide web 1000’s of years old. It doesnt make sense, the only logical explination is that that HTML, and VB were created by an inteligent entity, be that God, Sky Pixie, Al Gore, or Tim Berners-Lee, the HTML Bible says its only 13 years old or so, and the fact is, you have shown nothing to prove otherwise. Just a bunch of theorys by nonbelievers who would put forth any theory to avoid having to take responsability for thier coding errors. There’s that web site that reconstructed from a single snipet of code, and then later found out it was a piece of code from Byte magazines “Super Wumpas”. Open your heart to the truth Opal, it is you who has been brainwashed.

[sub]how many of you got the earlier Wirth referance and the super wumpas referance…Kid indeed[/sub]

[BottledBlondJeanie]

Hey ** Hardygrrl **

Not quite sure what your problem is other than you seem to be particularly bitchy…

As have stated numerous times in other threads, I sure wish I hadn’t written that thread as it was silly…but thanks for acknowledging that I’ve said that and slapping me in the face with it one more time. Sweet of you, really.

It seems to me that Com2 spent a lot of time writing that, and just because it wasn’t up to our standards, y’all accuse him of being on drugs–the VERY THING HE WAS RANTING ABOUT.

Fine, you think he was kidding, but WHAT IF HE WASN’T…I mean just cause he says something over-the-top in his rant does not mean he wants to do it-- hyperbole…we use it all the time…WHAT IF HE WAS SERIOUS? Weren’t you guys a bit harsh–mean and cruel even?

I enjoy coherence as much as the next person, frankly some people, when they RANT lose any sense of coherence…that does not give folks the right to jump all over his ass–it was his thread to begin with and he’s not cluttering up the boards…

So, guess what, until I find out that Com2 is a troll and is trying to write incoherently, I’m going to be nice to him. Being mean for the sake of being mean is not all it’s cracked up to be.

BBJ

[BottledBlondJeanie]

And if anyone bothers to check, his OP is similar to the rest of his posts, but he’s posted in several forums including GQ trying to make a contribution. I think he could be a valuable addition…why don’t the rest of you look at his posts, too?

BBJ

[Ferrous]

Fine, Jeannie. You believe that even stupid opinions, such as yours and the OP’s, shouldn’t be given flip, dismissive replies? Well, I disagree, but I’ll play along for now and expand on my previous reply to you.

"Hey, BBJ, can I have some of what you’re smoking?"

…'Cause apparently it sends you to some magical alternate dimension in which the OP isn’t an obnoxious, ignorant, steaming pile of shit.

I think it would be fun to visit this strange other world where such an evil and hateful idea is thought to be one worthy of respect and consideration…

Um, wait…no, it wouldn’t.

Yeah, on second thought, I’d rather stay in this world, where such ignorant filth is treated with the scorn and derision it deserves—at least by intelligent people, like most of the posters on this board.

The War on Drugs is an abomination. A vile and evil assault on freedom, and the worst, most destructive institution in the history of this country, excepting only slavery. But even the pernicious DEA only wants to imprison people, to steal their property and wreck their lives, for the victimless crime of performing experiments on their own nervous systems.

COM2Kid wants to murder them. Fuck him. His stupid and vicious opinion does not deserve even a moments’ serious consideration.

Fuck him, and fuck you for defending him, you sanctimonious twit.

[BottledBlondJeanie]

** Ferrous ** check out his other posts.

And you know what, I think you are attributing some other meaning to what ** Com2 ** said. He was joking–making an exaggeration about something that bothers him, it’s pretty damn obvious. How many times have we seen things of this nature in the pit from long-time posters?

I remember recently someone threatened to kill the ice-cream man…did you believe that, too.

I think throwing aroung ignorant vileness like this is bringing the pit right back to where it was before the big crash…WONDERFUL.

The pit is for ranting and bullshit, but get off of your horse and if ** Com2 ** doesn’t like drugs or drug users, fine, he’s entitled, but discuss that with him and not call him names.

And although, I, too, am not always entirely coherent, I am pretty far from being a twit, thank you very much…let’s try to refrain from throwing around insults for NO reason, shall we?
I don’t remember calling you any names.

BTW, leaving for vacation, now and won’t be able to respond until Tuesday.

BBJ

[bdgr]

Sombody get BBJ a map, I think shes lost.

[Ferrous]

*Originally posted by BottledBlondJeanie *
**** Ferrous ** check out his other posts. **

Okay, I took your suggestion. Most of his posts are rather innocuous. Some are even helpful or somewhat amusing. But still, generously peppered throughout, is the same sort of shit we see here: stating flat out that he wants to kill people who do things he doesn’t like.

Like this one, in which he advocates shooting potheads who “disrupt his education”, and here where he darkly hints about what he’d like to do to end the drug war. In this one, he fantasizes about hiring “death squads” to “assassinate companies who do shit I don’t like”, and various other nasty things. And let’s not forget this, the low point of a thread that was, admittedly, in rather poor taste anyway.

**And you know what, I think you are attributing some other meaning to what ** Com2 ** said. He was joking–making an exaggeration about something that bothers him, it’s pretty damn obvious. **

I think I have demonstrated that it is not “pretty damn obvious” that he was joking, when a pretty significant percentage of his total posts are saying the same thing. To the contrary, I think it’s pretty damn obvious that the OP represents his true feelings.

I remember recently someone threatened to kill the ice-cream man…did you believe that, too.

I think I’ll just answer that with a quick :rolleyes:

The pit is for ranting and bullshit, but get off of your horse and if ** Com2 ** doesn’t like drugs or drug users, fine, he’s entitled, but discuss that with him and not call him names.

If he doesn’t like them, fine, I agree he’s entitled. I have no problem with that. It’s when he begins advocating their deaths that I begin to have a problem.

And although, I, too, am not always entirely coherent, I am pretty far from being a twit, thank you very much…let’s try to refrain from throwing around insults for NO reason, shall we?
I don’t remember calling you any names.

No, you didn’t call me any names, you just stood up for an asshole who wants to kill me because I used to smoke pot. And I thought I was being rather restrained in calling you a “sanctimonious twit.” That’s actually a lot nicer than some of the other things I thought of.
But anyway, have fun on your vacation.

[Kalashnikov]

*Originally posted by hardygrrl *
**Can I have a show of hands? Who’s all for incoherence? **

Well if we’re talking about an argument in favor of my death, I’d prefer it to be incoherent.

[OpalCat]

Why did we all say “hey are you on drugs?”

BECAUSE THE OP READ LIKE IT WAS WRITTEN BY SOMEONE TOTALLY BOMBED

[hardygrrl]

*Originally posted by BottledBlondJeanie *
**Hey ** Hardygrrl **

Not quite sure what your problem is other than you seem to be particularly bitchy…

Mom, is that you?

It seems to me that Com2 spent a lot of time writing that, and just because it wasn’t up to our standards, y’all accuse him of being on drugs–the VERY THING HE WAS RANTING ABOUT.

Fine, you think he was kidding, but WHAT IF HE WASN’T…I mean just cause he says something over-the-top in his rant does not mean he wants to do it-- hyperbole…we use it all the time…WHAT IF HE WAS SERIOUS? Weren’t you guys a bit harsh–mean and cruel even?

I enjoy coherence as much as the next person, frankly some people, when they RANT lose any sense of coherence…that does not give folks the right to jump all over his ass–it was his thread to begin with and he’s not cluttering up the boards…

For the love of Christmas, I could beat my keyboard with a pair of Marlboro butts for fifteen minutes and be more coherent than the OP.

This is a public message board, dedicated to fighting ignorance. Public means “open to other’s opinions”. In other words if you post it, don’t bitch and moan about responses. As for fighting ignorance, I could do blotter acid, stick a crayon between my toes and still make more sense than the OP. Coherence. hmmm. Try reading a sample of posts from this forum. While they may use terms like “mother squicking, rejected by a RealDoll fuckwaffle”, they are easy to follow. They go from point a to point b without a detour into the Forest of Fuckheadedness.