[QUOTE=H3Knuckles]
I think timeframe is fairly important in this regard, such as:
“10 guys in one lifetime?” no, that’s fine.
“10 guys in 10 years?” meh, not so bad, I guess. Could stand to be a little more cautious about things, though.
“10 guys in less than 5 years?” getting kind of trampy, there.
“10 guys in 3 years or less?” welcome to slutsville, population you.
Also, context is important. If a woman’s been with many men, but they’ve all been fairly long-term relationships, it’s not a big deal. If a woman has had several one-night-stands, that’s pretty ho-bag. A history of cheating is also a pretty good indicator.
And yes, I feel this works in reverse (as in, for men) as well. I’m an equal-opportunity accuser. 
Of course, your mileage may vary.
[/QUOTE]
I somehow missed this post earlier, and I have to ask…
“More cautious” about what? One guy every 3.5 months is “slutsville”? And having one night stands makes one a “ho-bag”?
What’s the difference between fucking 10 people or a hundred? Either you believe that sex is a sacred bond between people who’ve mated for life (in which case more than one is too many), or you don’t, in which case the numbers shouldn’t matter. For the love of god, penises and vaginas do not wear out. They do not become inherently less valuable with use. Sex is, as far as I am concerned, playtime for grownups, and I don’t see what’s wrong with having lots of playmates.
I’m with you on the cheating, but as long as everyone is honest and careful, I don’t see what’s wrong with having all the sex I want, with anyone I like, for no reason other than because I feel like it.