Personally I’m really curios to hear what GuanoLad has to say for himself. Do you have any defense or explanation for calling sodomy immoral? Care tyo revise your postitions? Or are you just going to stew there in your smug superiority?
Cool, and oldscratch pit thread! We never agree on anything, and this should be a good opportunity to get in a few cheap shots.
Let’s consult my ledger and see where I need some revenge.
Ok, here we go:
Red Cross thread: Vehmently disagreed, was fairly polite and reasonable. Crap! that’s no good.
Wait:
Here we go: Communism Nazi, pit thread about me, tended to disagree, but was damn reasonable. Crap!
For somebody I disagree with this much, you’d think I’d have a good grudge, wouldn’t you?
Well, I guess I’ll just have to revert to “Commie Rat-fink!,” until I can find something better. 
Damn, Nen, and I was going to tell you my ceiling thinks you give good head…
Sorry Scylla. I’ve been derilect in my duties. And that reminds me, I’ll go back to the Red Cross thread and see if I can’t get you steaming from the ears. Gotta keep everything running smoothly here at the Straight Dope.
On that note… fuck you Scylla. 
You just won’t let that little incident slide, will you?
Muc as you have your opinion about illegal drugs, or rather the illegal use of drugs Oldscratch I too have mine and they happen to be largely opposed to yours.
This is not really in tune with the OP but I’ll put in my tuppence worth anyway.
I assume that by using drugs illegally you obviously mean in a controlled manner and do not advocate the extremes, the results of which I witness every day of my working life.
You may accept that certain drugs such as hallucinogenics can excarcerbate underlying mental conditions but the problem comes in that some of those who are damaged by them have no awareness of any potential problem - even doses that might be considered safe for others can be harmful, that is no differant to ‘medicinal’ drugs but the differance is that we are talking of personality disorders caused in the pursuit of pleasure rather than as a byproduct of medical treatment.
You may indeed have lots of control but I read the records of hundreds of those who thought likewise, and they ended in jail not necassarily for taking the drugs themselves but by their actions either to obtain the means to purchase them or their activities when tripping.
I truly believe that we will always take mood altering substances, we simply are not going to change thousands of years of history nor is there any need to but trying to compare sucrose with heroin, crack cocaine, morphine et al(which I think someone was trying to hint at in a very loose way) or any of the synthetic and even more potent variants of these is like trying to compare a sea breeze with a hurricane, it does not really give much weight to your argument.
Sure prohibition of drugs is wasting lives in many ways and is pointless in certain types of drug but the damage I witness cannot be swept under the carpet, every serious drug user I meet thinks they are right and the whole world is naiive and wrong, it just comes with the territory.
Where do you think the line should be drawn in practical terms or do you think that all drugs should be freely available to anyone, anytime, anyplace?
I guess this post is not very pitworthy and as such does not belong here, see you in GD when someone, inevitably, bring the issue up again (and still changes nobody’s point of view )
No, though you did a nice little slide in the snow. Too bad it’s melted and the 6’4 snow angel on my deck is no longer there to make me laugh.
Well, I guess I have a few minutes to kill before I get out of the computer lab, so here goes:
And exactly what drugs cause personality disorders? Which disorders? Cite? I didn’t think so.
Now this is just ridiculous. Nen’s argument was that anything introduced into the body had an effect - be it sugar or heroin. No, I’m pretty sure that doesn’t mean she advocates the sprinkling of morphine sulfate on a kid’s Cocoa Krispies.
Also, I noticed you were careful to say “illegal drugs” in your post, casdave. Does this mean that you think alcohol is less harmful than most illegal drugs? Do you think alcohol should be illegal?
And the drug war is stopping that damage, how exactly? I guess you hadn’t seen the recent news articles that came to the conclusion that heroin and cocaine are actually THREE TIMES CHEAPER than they were in 1981, when Reagen first started kicking the WoD into high gear. No, it doesn’t make much sense to me, either, but that’s the way it is and draconian laws aren’t going to change that.
Ah, why am I even bothering? I’ve fought this fight a thousand times before. The bottom line is that the War on Drugs does a HELL of a lot of harm and absolutely ZERO good.
:eek: Nen!
::Rasa has an M Butterfly moment::
Considering the context, that’s a very unfortunate “<snip>”, Rasa.
Tymp, thanks for coming though on that one… I was waiting for a JDT reference. Poor Nen, emasculated twice in the same thread… maybe a little butter will fix that.
casdave, you missed the point. Hopefully neutron star was able to explain it for you.
::Nen checks between his legs::
(And by the way, I am not a she).
You know coldfire if you are going to mention my name in a bbq pit thread you could at least flame me a little bit, or, better yet explain how I went “over the top” in a way that is beyond the pale of how people go over the top all the time on this board. I never used derogatory or inflammatory language with the minor exception of turning one word “dickhead” back on the original user of that term. Frankly i think you lumped me in here because I agree with Scratch on a point or two and my preference for debate is more akin to a hand grenade than you might like. Also you make it apparent that you have sympathy for Guano, which I can understand as it is admirable to be an underdog, which he so clearly was in that debate.
Well if you feel the need to mention me again in the pit and do so without at least some harsh and enjoyable language then you can just lick my tiny rice-sized penis for making me feel left out because mentioning me in passing makes me feel like a damned sidekick and that, I assure you, I am not.
Carry on.
Oh, come on, Zen, doesn’t everyone want to be in oldscratch’s posse?
Don’t make an ass out of yourself. I explained myself profusely in the MPSIMS thread at hand, and merely posted here to offer GuanoLad some wel-meant advice. I have no need or desire to flame you, zen. I explained what you did wrong in the appropriate place (and, thus, appropriate manner), and that was it.
Read that thread again, and tell me how the hell I am not supposed to conclude you’re merely trying to get a rise out of GuanoLad.
Lumped you in? My ass.
As a matter of fact, I agree with you and oldscratch on the principal of this matter. It was the execution of the “debate” that I took offense to in my role as a moderator. They’re two different things. Are you questioning my ability to separate my personal opinion from moderating decisions?
Because if you do, you’ve chosen a piss-poor example. Do a search for my name and the word “drugs”. You’ll find me to be so liberal, it’ll scare you. In short though: my opinion on the matter is immaterial. This was about forum rules, and people not obeying them.
Moreover, it crossed the line in terms of our rules. That’s what matters.
Sympathy for GuanoLad? No more than for you or oldscratch, in this case. I told the three of you what I thought, and I told the three of you to stop acting like children.
Again, my personal preference for posters does not influence my moderating decisions. I dare you to prove otherwise.
Sorry about not fulfilling your entertainment needs. Turn on the Cartoon Network, Tom & Jerry are on in 5 minutes.
Your anatomy is the last thing on my mind, by the way. Let this be clearly understood.
Will do. Don’t bother me again with this nonsese unless you have something substantial to go on, OK?
eh… just posting that I don’t really have a problem with what Coldfire did, although I do disagree with him on a point or two…
and bumping in the hopes the HersheySquirt* will come back and play.
*thanks Hastur
::lays out bumps::
Sorry I’m so freakin’ late. Totally forgot there was a party in here.
Anyone got a syringe to shoot crack into my eyeball with?
coldfire
Well of course I was trying to get a rise out of him! Duh. However, if you mean was I trying to incite him into a fit of childish responses to pointed questioning then you misunderstand. I echoed Scratch because he was in the process of using the most dramatic and direct comparison to draw out a conclusive and final statement on law being the final guideline of morality and being pointedly ignored on the (contrived, IMHO) grounds that his questioning was a personal attack.
I was curious specifically if the person stating that breaking the law was interested in retracting that statement upon being reminded that the law is not always or even usually moral and is quite often contrary to morality. The issue of slavery seems to be such a noteable marker for this thought that my echoed question would seem obvious. Had Guano (note that while I abbreviate I do not alter. On that form I disagree with Scratch) simply stated either one of two things I would have left off. Either he could have retracted his absolute judgement of the morality of law or re-affirmed it by stating that slavery and every other rule of man is just and moral at the time and place of application. Without such qualification our responsibility to enlighten is left unfulfilled.
After all, in order to educate it is oft nessisary to point out and shatter the illusions that the one in need of enlightenment holds to be true. By illustrating the corner Guano was painting himself into, I feel I was doing just this. Of all the folly’s of man hypocracy is the most vile and yet seductive.
p.s.
Thank you for implying that I may be an ass as it is at leas almost a flame. Weak effort, but at least some effort and akin’ to my statement regarding those who call others a dickhead. almost identical, in fact.
I did not call you an ass, I told you not to make an ass out of yourself, as long as semantics seem to be so important.
I did so because you asked me to explain something that I already elaborated upon elsewhere. I’m the sort of person that doesn’t like to waste time by doing things twice. You might wanna remember that for future reference.
Furthermore, you seem to think I’m interested in debating your motivations regarding the topic at hand. I’m not. I was merely interested in keeping things civil in MPSIMS.
Glad to see you’re completely skipping the topic of favouritism. You seem to have some common sense after all.
old scratch,
I wasn’t going to say anything but your methods are juvenile and your persistance is getting old.
Why not lay off Guanolad for a bit and enjoy your existance as a pain-in-the-ass dog sodomist and deal with the fact you took his opinions in MPSIMS and goated him on. You wanted to create a rise out of him. You did it, okay?
He’s done with your pettiness and has moved on, so why don’t you?
I only say this trite (sp) because you have gone beyond the call of your duty to prove you are a dickhead.
Okay? It’s over and done with now. Go along your merry way and find a new victim to press your bullshit upon?
If you plan on doing it to me, I will not respond. You are a vicious (sp) being and your attempts at being a jerk, asshole, dickhead or whatever are well viewed by the crap you have typed in this thread.
I don’t give a rat’s ass if you care what I have to say or not but it’s bullshit people like you that make me rethink the human race as a whole.