I’m starting to wonder if Britney Spears is the female version of a flasher. This is different to a streaker who shows their entire body, not necessarily for sexual fettish reasons. But like the steriotypical dirty old man in a raincoat that shows his penis to startle others for his own self gratification.
Is there a real mental ‘illness’ behind such people’s action, and is Britney suffering from the same ‘illness’?
I’m reminded of the ROcky Horror Picture show where the comments track suggests that Little Nell was a female flasher, and that the exposures that got into the film were all intentional on her part.
So do female flashers really exist. And is it a real paraphillia like male flashing.
Not a good shot of course, but on a scale of 1-10 I’d rate her happly place at about a 4. At least it doesn’t look a wizards sleeve, but give her time, she’s still young.
I dunno which set of pics you’re looking at. If she has a green dress on, then yeah, her poontang is just as nice and neat as can be-- but if it is the other set, then “meat flaps” comes to mind.
I’ve seen my share of punannies and, let me assure you, the outer part usually does not hang quite so low. Perhaps her vajayjay got that way from a night of dragging it around from night club to night club or maybe the friction of sliding it up and down the limo seat.
That’s it, I’m done. I can’t think of any other stupid names to call Britney’s vagina.
I disagree, she’s nasty. Between her rolls of flab, her c-section scar, and her dried up pussy I’d say there’s plenty wrong with how she looks. Sure, some women have those issues, but they don’t go around spreading their legs for the paparazzi.
Neither. I attribute it to a total lack of breeding. She (and the other two in the Unholy Trinity) are perfect examples of how money cannot buy class.
Compare them with the late Princess Diana. She may have been nuttier than a Claxton fruitcake, but that broad knew how to be a lady. When you’re wearing a skirt (or 1/8th of a skirt & no bloomers), you put your knees together, turn on your butt & swing your CLOSED legs & feet to the ground outside the car door. Then you arise from the car. You don’t flap them open and let the world get a glimpse the unknown.
So, most normal vaginas are dripping wet? That would be typical? Most women who aren’t nasty looking don’t have any rolls of fat?
I don’t mean to harp on this, but I just wish that people would admit that they want to make fun of Britney and call her ugly and gross and a skank regardless of what she looks like, instead of insisting that this normal-if-not-above-average-looking woman somehow is ugly, fat, or whatever.
I’m not speaking for Indygrrl but I will repeat— labias do NOT usually hang down in that manner. They do not usually come into contact with your thighs. Take it from a woman who vaginally gave birth to twins (no whimpy c-sections for me!)-- even immediatly after the birth, my lips stayed up where they belong-- attached quite firmly to the rest of my womanly bits.
Ok, this link is Not Safe for Work or for sensitive people:
You look at that and tell me it is not grotesque. Maybe I’m fortunate enough to only see pretty pussies, but in my experience that is NOT how a healthy vagina looks. And she IS flabby, that is not an exaggeration, it is right there in front of you.
And if Britney is above average looking then I am Miss Universe.
I’ve stood up for her before, and I still do think she will make an awesome comeback, but how she looks right now is not impressive. She’s vile.
It couldn’t be just drunkenness. She left the house with no underwear on. She knew she would be mobbed by paparazzi because she always is. She must have premeditated this whole display.
I can only think she is mentally reeling in the wake of her announced divorce. She looks like she has just completely lost it.
Haven’t looked at the pics and with luck it will stay that way. Sounds way more gross than titillating.
