Given the choice of mastubating to those pics or the bra section of the winter 1974 Sears Catalog, I would choose the latter.
Well, since I’m at work, I’ll have to hold judgement on that link until later this evening; I’m just going off of what I remember seeing last night.
But, here’s the thing (and I promise to come back here once I get home and look at some of these other links): I look around at the women in my office, for example. They probably range in age from 20-ish to 50-something. Britney is, no questions asked, in the top 30% percentile for good-lookingness (and really, that’s very very conservative). If I went down to the local college campus, and compared her to the college girls there, she’d still be comfortably in the top 50% (again, that’s a very conservative estimate).
My point is not that she’s supermodel-esque. It’s just that if I lived in a world where Britney represented the bottom of the barrel looks-wise, then goodness would this be a smokin’ place to be.
If Britney looks vile, then I’d hate to hear judgments passed on other women.
Both sets of pics are at wwwegotasticdotcom (not linking even though the thumbnails have strategic stars that you must click to see the unvarnished truth)-- the one in which she is wearing the green dress is on top and if you scroll down you can see the pics of her in the car with Paris. There are many shots and many angles and, well, I guess you can decide.
Oh, and like pool says, I’m sure lots of folks vaginas could be photographed in less-than-flattering angles/situations. Not only that, but IME shaving makes labia much more pronounced than they would be otherwise.
Where the eagles cry, on a mountain high?
This isn’t such an old idea, as evidenced by Britney Britney Britney on Atomfilms. (May not be safe for work.)
As a connoisseur of vaginas, I’m always puzzled when people get so hyper critical of a woman’s parts. Especially when it comes from a woman. I happen to like the more natural appearance and appreciate the variety.
When it’s a man (or more likely a boy) pointing at a pussy and saying “ewwwww!,” I figure it’s the result of viewing too much porn in which the women’s hot bits are unnaturally neat (like the rest of the woman) and shaved to look like a 12-year-old girl’s vagina. My theory is that there is a whole generation of young men who – having little firsthand experience with pussies – think that is the natural state of a vagina and that any depiction of fleshy labia (or more than just tiny perfect little lips) is some sort of horrific deformity. And God forbid they should ever see pussy hair!
When a woman makes the same criticism, that explanation probably doesn’t hold up. So is it just cattiness, combined with a hate for Britney? And too much pride in one’s own pussy? You know, I’m pretty sure your labia just are what they are and you can’t really take credit for having them tucked up so neatly “where they belong.” Unless Britney’s been doing some really wierd S&M things like hanging the LA phone book from her pussy and walking around the house, I doubt she had any control over her pussy lips being neat and orderly or wild and wiggly.
And your assertion that labia just don’t hang like that is wrong. Yeah, sometimes they do. Maybe you like it, maybe you don’t, but what are you implying? That being a no-talent pop star makes your pussy lips grow like Pinnochio’s nose?
Of course, that doesn’t change the fact that she’s skanky trailer trash.
I have no love for Britney, but y’all are going overboard with the hatin’.
I do see some unsightly redness in what might be the “taint” area, but nothing truly grotesque.
Nope. Not seeing that at all. Only if you have bought into anorexia would she seem “flabby.” Looks perfectly normal, weight-wise.
Well, she is an above-average looking woman, but, as this series of pictures reveal (to those who hadn’t already noticed) Britney just wasn’t “raised right.” She is coming across as a skank, and for that reason is unappealing (despite her above-average looks).
The average woman isn’t going around giving crotch shots to photographers, so there’s no call to judge them. Any women posed in a skin mag would be subject to scrutiny, so Britney knew what she was getting into when she decided to show the world her goods.
I work with about 50 women who are more beautiful than Britney Spears, by a mile. And their pussies ain’t skeery like that. I simply can’t agree that Brit is in the top percentage of gorgeous women, it just doesn’t fit with the world I live in.
Q: aren’t women like BS exhibitionists? Face, she likes attention. one way to get it is to dress provocatively. You can’t tell me that she doesn’t enjoy this. What about the models? their “job” is to walk doen a catwalk, wearing little or nothing-of course they are well paid for this!
Intriguing…
So you work with 50 women more beautiful than Britney Spears and you’ve all compared pussies at some point. Are you accepting applications?
Well, perhaps we will have to agree to disagree. 
But, I will try to make one more point. Yes, Britney opened herself up to scrutiny (hah!) by flashing the photographers. But, that doesn’t have any relevance to her physical beauty, just her level of crassness.
Have you seen the vaginas of those fifty women? What kind of place do you work in which you all are willing to, um, share like that?
It’s a strip club, everyone’s pretty liberal when it comes to nekkidness. 
Ah ha!
In that case, I suggest you’re not working from a representative sample of the genita… general female population!
OK, there is no way there are 50 strippers TOTAL in Indianapolis who are better-looking than Britney Spears, much less at one club.
At least not in normal lighting. Under blacklights and a strobe light, possibly.
I contend that those hanging labia are NOT normal-- not even for Britney. Take a look at the second set of pictures where she looks just fine and dandy. It is my belief that a drunken night of dragging that pussy around unadorned and unprotected caused that unsightly mess. I have also seen a lot of pussies. Lots and lots-- in showers, on children, in locker rooms, in girlfriend’s apartments, in porno-- I’ve seen hangy ones, I’ve seen fat ones, I’ve seen stretched out ones-- but I have NEVER seen lips that go past the groin and touch thigh.
Maybe I’m missing it, but I’m not seeing the picture where this is happening.
Are you saying that not wearing panties for a night causes labial distention? I find that very difficult to believe. (Though like spoke-, I also can’t see where this is allegedly happening.)
I contend that it looks like it smells a bit, though.
Whatever, haters. I’d still do her, and I’m pretty sure I’m not alone.
Well, now you have. Consider your horizons broadened.
I say we just stone her for being a skank rather than for having a body part that you consider freakish.