I’m going with wrong. 
It looks like a perfecty yummy one to me. I was expecting something resembling road kill from the reactions here.
Alas, we’ve finally discovered Britney’s true talent.
In the first shot of the site I linked to, her lips are touching her thigh. You’ve seen a few pussies, you should know how far lips have to stretch to touch thigh.
But. . . When it’s only you who is seeing such a thing, you must entertain the idea that you are mistaken. The idea is not at all amused by me, though.
That ain’t saying much!
To reiterate:
You know I keep looking at these photos and 2 stick out to me. I think in one where her leg is scrunched in close to her, what appears to be part of her naughty bits is actually a fold of fat from her thigh, because the next picture her vagina looks absolutely normal, I think what some claim they are seeing is fat from her thigh creasing in a way to give that mistaken appearance.
If I’m looking at what you’re looking at - you’re looking at her thigh. Unless you want to post a picture with the part you’re looking at circled and give an NFL-style play-by-play, I’m pretty sure you’re not looking at what you think you’re looking at.
Her thigh moved to touch her LM, her LM did not move to touch her thigh. I do not see one iota of unordinariness in that.
Man, this chick is on the textbook Road To Porn. There’s already the “sex tape,” although I haven’t seen it, and I have no idea if it’s real. But Lord, it’s only a matter of time before we see the Vivid “Britney DVDA” video.
Looks like a perfectly normal vag to me. Honestly, body image among women is bad enough-now we have to worry about how long our naughty bits are? Is there a standard? Are we going to start seeing plastic surgery on cooches, so they look “proper?” Of COURSE they look like they’re hitting her thighs-look at the angle of the photograph, and how she’s sitting.
As for how Britney looks, I agree she looks horrible-BUT…I think that’s more due to the fact that she continually chooses the most unflattering clothing, hairstyles, and make-up. She has no fashion sense whatsoever. She dresses like a thirteen year old’s idea of “sexy hooker” and constantly has those cheap Kmart extensions glued in and buys her make up 50% off from the 99 cent store.
And no way she didn’t do this on purpose. It’s Britney-she’s so freaking pork stupid she probably figured, ‘It’ll be SEXAY, Y’ALL!!!’ Ugh. Panties, Brit. Please.
Apparently, the overwhelming opinion amongst my co-workers, family, on-line friends and acquaintances is that the question “Hey, whaddaya think of this pussy?” is making them uncomfortable and that I should really really just stop it.
Yeah, this reminds me of the Linda Tripp thing (wow, takes ya back, huh?). Everyone hated her so they poked fun of her weight and her constant eating on the phone tapes she made. They went for her weight because they knew she’d be personally vulnerable in that respect. Unless they thought she was some kinda super patriot…then they poked fun of Monica Lewinsky’s weight. They hated her first, then hit her where it hurt. Like Britney Spears in this thread. I’m not a fan, but Jesus, just admit you hate her already…don’t gin up a lot of nonsence about her cunt. I’m shocked at the negative reactions in this thread. It looked fine to me.
EXCELLENT post. The levels of hypocrisy around here set off my BS meter like an air raid siren.
Well, labiaplasty is a big fad right now. Many women are having it done and it is a big money maker for Plastic Surgeons and a relatively easy and low risk surgery. The Pussy Fixers of this New Millenium are like the Titty Makers of the early eighties. It’s gone From Gold in them thar hills to Gold in the Mine (so to speak).
I wouldn’t be surprised if there isn’t some young woman out there right now who took these flashing pictures of Spears to a Plastic Surgeon and has an appointment for a Britney Pussy Lift and Sculpting, as we speak.
I thought her fan base was 13-23 year olds. More on the younger side, like pre-teens. Am I wrong? How does this go over with parents buying her CD’s for kids?
I don’t think enough about her to hate her but I’d be mortified if there were pictures of me around like this that my kids would one day see. Since she did the same thing like three days in a row it’s doubtful that it’s an accident. Is this the kind of PR that people really want?
I just wonder what goes through someone’s mind to know that photographers are standing there taking your picture and you jump in a car with no underwear on spread eagle for the world to see.
I have to admit, I would have been more turned on had it been a boobieflash. It’s just not that sexy.
Now boobies, those have a personality. Britney’s Vagina is just kind of a Wallflower. Not even some character. She needs some bling-bling for that Pussy. Maybe some stick on sequins and a big Platinum labial barbell with 5 Kts of Diamonds.
Labiaplasty? Bah! That’s for the merely vain. Now, for full-blown batshit crazy, you wanna go for anal bleaching.
Alone? Are you mad? There are millions upon millions of us. If she was a nobody she’d still be a very shaggable girl.
She a gobshite, that is without question but a very doable one. She nothing special but she’s a good looking girl and anyone that says different is a fucking liar IMO.
Resolved: she’s a skank.
But little Astroboy informs me that the punani looks just fine…
-
Britney is a ho-bag. She can call her self “country” all she want’s but she’s still a ho-bag.
-
“accidential” crotchy shots are sooooo, 1994.
-
There’s nothing, whatsoever, wrong with Britney’s crotch, weight or looks. I think her bits look perfectly normal (not that I’m an expert), and it strikes me as absurd that anyone would say otherwise. I mean, women, pick up a mirror and look at your crotch at various angles with varying degrees of leg splayage and the thing kinda moves around. What a bizarre thing to criticize her for, particularly when there are so many REAL things to criticize her for.
If we could get back to the OP for just a second, doesn’t she have a standing multi-million dollar offer from Playboy? I can’t imagine waving it around town for free makes any sense at all from a career or financial standpoint as long as that offer is on the table. I think she must’ve been drunk, feeling wild and free from being newly single, and didn’t put much thought into going commando in a micro-skirt.
I would be willing to bet that she is intentionally ignoring tabloid stories about herself even more than usual right now, so when she did it the 2nd time she didn’t know yet about the 1st offense.
She didn’t really do it 3 times, did she? I’ve only seen 2 photo sets and one was much less egregious than the other.
Y’know, someone should clue in Brit that the “Teen Ho” look worked for her back when she was a teen. Come on, even Xtina Aguilera has decided she had enough of that schtick. So I must believe (getting back to the OP) that Brit IS an exhibitionist/flasher **beyond ** what you normally expect from someone in this line of work (which would be more along the lines of the ocassional “misappropriated private sex tape” – yeah, right --, red carpet wardrobe malfunction, and skin-mag spread, all set up to look just right while doing it). If you’re gonna be an exhibitionist, at least try to come across as a fabulous one, not as crass trash.
As to the body-image discussion that has taken over the thread, must say that BS is above-the-median in terms of conventional attractiveness (and her body type is far more normal than Paris’ ), only that admittedly the difference between when she is in top tour form, with all makeup/hair/clothes/diet/workout cylinders firing, and her “off days” look, CAN be a bit startling. For someone who just did two pregnancies in quick succession she’s not doing badly body-wise, but yes, she’s kinda careless WRT to appearance maintenance when not actually performing, more so than you’d expect of someone who CAN afford to have the babies cared for while she takes care of herself.
The particular intimate part is not hideous at all, it’s just run-of-the-mill if you ask me. Like someone else said, what do you want, it’s a hoohah, not modern scupture. BUT, I guess that’s the thing: it’s average. It kills the fantasy; it looks like something you would not mind seeing next Friday night at home… but kind of a let-down to find on a big-time sex-symbol celeb at the clubs, vs. the expectation that if a celeb will go through the trouble of flashing her proof-of-gender she’d have it all primped and preened for a public appearance (but heck, she often looks like she made little effort at ANY part of her appearance…).