By this point, you’d think he’d have it hanging on a hook right next to his emergency exit, like firemen keep their gear…
jayjay
::sighs::
Let me rephrase that
Being motivated by short term temporary pleasure with a serious potential to cause negative side effects in the future;
is way down there on the evolutionary scale.
Yeesh.
(unless of your you have some sort of psychological condition like OCD or such that causes you to do various actions dispite your best attempts not to, but that is not the case here).
Reading brings me pleasure, and thus I read. But I know that reading brings me pleasure and I have CONTROL over that emotion and I use it to modify my behavior as I see fit. That is evolved action.
Somebody dropping acid on the other hand, that is being motivated by short term pleasure. Which is IMNSHO, wrong.
I just follow the
“the words are being represented by quasi existing electrons flying around on a world wide network, and darned if I am going to get woried about something that only quasi-exists.”
Physics is fun. 
I know people hate this, but:
Com2Kid:
:rolleyes:
It can certainly be argued that pleasure is what keeps us going. Pleasure in having warmth at all times (and in cooked meat/veggies) brought about the continued use of fire. And so forth. If sex wasn’t pleasurable, we’d either reproduce by budding or we’d have died off much earlier (note: I believe the latter, not the former). If there wasn’t something pleasurable about bringing children into the world women would refuse to do it because of the pain involved. And so on.
Sorry. Different wording, same implication. But now you’ve thrown in the “negative side effects” (AIDS? STDs?) angle. You’re digging yourself in deeper.
- s.e.
Thank you Brother Chastity.
You know the old saying, opinions, humble or not, are like assholes? We all have them and most of us don’t give a shit about anyone else’s.
So you won’t object to me invoking the SDMB’s magic word, then? Cite?
You’re throwing around these terms without even attempting to define them or establish a scientific basis for them. What is an “evolutionary scale”? What is “short term” in this context? What are the “negative side effects” and can you demonstrate that they do have a “serious potential” (whatever that is exactly)?
Unless you can answer these questions (and those that will no doubt follow) adequately, you’re going to appear to be using pseudo-science to justify your own preconceptions. Do you mean that some motavations are inherently better in continueing a species regardless of situation, and that there is a ranking of these motavations? I’d like to see that backed up by some actual research. Or do you mean that evolution strives to impart humans with some motaviations that it percieves as better than others? Uhh… Well, that would be an interesting take on things, but it strikes me as somewhat divergent from reality.
Unless you want to fuck it. :eek:
::condoms rain down on scott evil::
Naughty boy! Don’t hijack Com2Kid’s gangbang…
jayjay
It must be a neat existence to have the whole world figured out like Com2Kid.
This is gonna be fun… 
OMG Scott Evil, I handed you that punch line on a silver platter and I didn’t even realize it.
It was right there. I had to take it.
Anyway, Com2Kid, if wanting sexual pleasure is somehow contrary to evolution, how come we can still jerk off with opposable thumbs? Hmmm? HMMMM? 
- s.e.
I am motivated by pleasure and for that, I make no apologies.
Y’know, I think I understand what Com2Kid said. There’s short term pleasure – that’s an indulgence; then there’s long term pleasure that comes from accomplishment and development:
Anyone who indulges themselves by overdoing pleasures such as:
A) Parachuting
B) Sex
C) Motorcycles
D) Drug Use
E) Vanilla Hazelnut Hagendaaz (mmm)
To the extent that they risk their life and/or long term happiness is fucking immature. And y’know what? If I care about you, you’re in for a lecture at the very least. And if your friends don’t – you don’t have any.
Let’s agree to not be so tolerant that all our friends reenact Requiem for a Dream, ok?
-Ace
[Wow, thread deja vu. Something about whether to tell a guy that’s he’s dating a trannie…]
Not to many people get HIV from jerking off. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Yeesh.
Evolution doesn’t remove all the bad traits, it just takes the easiest path. Evolution is NOT forward looking, it concerns the here and the now. Something changes and what was once great evolutionary practice can easily start to suck.
And last time I checked our species has had MAJOR changes go on in it. There was that whole entire industrial revolution thingy not to long ago, and before that there was the introduction of algriculture and so on.
Well, I don’t consider promiscuity stupid, but let’s leave aside that point for a moment.
You don’t feel compassion enters into it when someone does something stupid? We’ve all done something stupid. If we become intolerant to the mistakes of others, the world’s going to become a very mean place very quickly.
I realize this is a hijack, but I just have to say that I’d like to think people have compassion for me next time I make some stupid or self-destructive blunder.
I meant with hands that have opposable thumbs… :smack:
- s.e.
I don’t have a steady boyfriend right now. Does that mean I should deny myself sexual pleasure (including masturbation)? If you had it your way, Kid, I wouldn’t have sex until I met someone, had a long courtship, and married him. :rolleyes:
Have you ever masturbated? If so, do you still? I can see your reply now: [dumb guy voice]“I don’t need to. I have a steady wife/girlfriend.”[/dumb guy voice]
I’m very, very sorry, but if I meet someone I fancy at a club, there’s a good chance we’ll have pleasurable, consensual sex. Maybe we’ll see each other again, maybe not. Maybe it’ll develop into something “more,” maybe it will remain a casual arrangement between consenting adults.
And if I happen to be home alone and feeling randy, I don’t see why I shouldn’t have a wank.
- s.e.
Well, I’m not going to hijack this thread by discussing Com2Kid gross misunderstanding of evolutioanry biology, so I’’’ confine myself to a few quick commments.
-
Sex for pleasure is an innate urge. I refer you the many instances of copulation in the animal kingdom, where the institution of marraige is unknown.
-
Adults have the right to do with their bodies what they will.
-
Gay men are intimately familar with the safer sex rules, much more so than the majority of heteros.
-
To warn gay men about safer sex is presumptuous, a) because you are assuming a privilege of intimacy or authority you don’t possess, b)because you know less about safer sex than most gay men do, so you are presuming to teach where you should learn, and c) it’s none of your damn business.