Remember how there’s no such thing as spousal rape, because you’re literally one, thus you would be raping yourself? (I asked him if that wouldn’t just make marital sex masturbation but he didn’t reply)
Or that he has literally seen demons in disguise – often in the faces of children or animals. (When I told him he should seriously get help, I was accused of “diagnosing someone online”)
Frankly, when I come across one of Kanicbird’s posts, I have the same reaction as if I encountered a homeless delusional person . I pay no attention. He really must by a lonely harmless person deserving of pity rather than scorn or fear. Especially on an anonymous message board.
Quite honestly, it would not surprise me. (And you know what’s REALLY scary – he volunteers to work with kids)
That would be easy – if he wouldn’t tell rape victims they still have soul ties to their rapists, and that “date rape” isn’t really rape. Or when he tells parents that the reason their children are disabled is because said children made pacts with demons before they were born.
All we “know” about Kanicbird and his beliefs is what he tells us. He seems to ramble on in his posts like they are simply monalogs without any attempt to debate.
If he talked like that in real life he would be shunned by just about everyone. No one would want to stick around to listen to him. Frankly it would be somewhat embarrassing .
I can’t believe that anyone, including rape victims or parents of disabled children can be offended by the musings of a mentally disabled person.
This really doesn’t help his case, though. If someone decides to forge a “soul tie” with someone else against her will, it doesn’t make such a thing okay, it makes it violent and wrong on yet another level. It’s not just a violation in the physical and emotional/psychological senses, but it’s also a violation in the spiritual/metaphysical sense.
One could even argue that violating someone spiritually is even worse than the other two.
I couldn’t parse his post either, but it sort of sounded like male victims of rape wouldn’t feel bad because they want to procreate, along the same lines as what he said for female victims of rape. Although I suppose it could be interpreted that he meant rape is okay cuz gee, the rapist just wants to have a baby. :rolleyes: Either way, he is completely delusional about what rape is – a violent assertion of power and control over someone, having nothing to do with making babies.
It also apparently never occurred to him that by and large, male victims of rape would not be assaulted by women, making the “procreation” angle utterly moot.
You know how half the time (not this time!) his first paragraph will be normal and good sense and a perfectly respectable thing to say, and then the second paragraph will be absolutely nucking futs?
He does that on purpose, he said once. He’s trying to lull you with a nice reasonable beginning and then drop that shit on your after you’re already reading. It’s a tool of his to get you to, you know, accept him into your heart or whatever.