But you did get a response from **Dio’s **own mouth before I jumped in, as I just mentioned.
I see your point here, and I agree that I (unintentionally) hijacked your questioning, but my options when I saw what you posted were to 1. Comment on it or 2. File it away for later. But I’m not a Trap Springer ™ - I don’t take detailed notes and file things away until I have a mountain of evidence. I’m far too impulsive for that level of strategy. I much prefer to just call people on stuff when I see it and make them explain.
You’re right about this, though, I fell like we’ve played this disagreement out. I just had to get the last word in.
Well the first thing that I want to comment on is that I have no problem with the scum trusting Darth seeing as how he’s dead but I think distrusting NBC is a bad idea also for the same reason. Beyond that I think this is a very pretty way to get people to use one of your lists as a basis for trusting or distrusting people.
I do have to ask after quoting you why there is a URL in that list of smilies and since it has mscumB in the title I’m not clicking just in case. :dubious:
Christ, NAF. Give it up. In every single post, I made it as clear as I possibly could that I wasn’t trying to smudge story, but that I was trying to forestall reactions like Roosh’s: putting him unimpeachably into the pro-Town camp. If you want to read into what I’ve said more than that, you’re more than welcome to, but I did my damndest to explain in every post that my concerns were long-shot ones. Any smudging of story was purely unintentional, and would be entirely the fault of the person who misread what I wrote.
Yeah, I’ve been following the thread.
I’m still not sure what grand trap you had planned to out me as the secret Cabalistic Vampwolf Lord, but I don’t think Shadowfacts’ questioning you as to why you were so hot on my trail back there was wrong in itself. You do seem a little more bloodthirsty than normal.
I just noticed that Dotchan is listed twice once under trust and once under don’t also Pede listed himself under the don’t trust list. I have to admit I wish I were scum just so I might understand the list.
Good God really? Has it been that long since we have played in a game together?
There wasn’t any grand trap, I was just trying to get a better feel for what you were saying since you pinged me. Inflamatory language is often a good way to do that. Is this new a strategy to you? (Hint: If you say yes I am going to call BS and ask what you did to the real Dio)
I have been rather transperant I think. Also I have to admit that I was coming off the high of being right about Pede being scum based on similar behavior, as well as my picking out Mr.Blocky as scum in the offboard game (well not scum, I was scum, but he was the equivalent of scum to my team, a non scum anti town element.)
Ok, I think that scum wil hang in the middle of the pack trying to look as centrally bell curve related to appear to be "normal. I do believe that pede is scum and that we have a vig. Therefore the vig can take out pede tonight. I have been very consistent in my vote the lurker pursuit. Ergo, a vote for cog.
Probably didn’t answer all your points but it should at least give you a start.
I’m reading his posts merely for the entertainment value. To try and extract something meaninful would be building castles on the sand.
And now that I re-read I should have been more more clear on my “slam dunk” since it it merely consistent with previously stated game play strategies. Voting lurkers and trying to stimulate discussion. YMMV
Believe this, if it would ever happen to come down to a horse race and pede and someone else, scum daddy pede gets my vote. However, I would still like for cog to post something for the day.
All thoughts related to pede rated from least likely to most likely, IMHO.
Pro town Vig: I think that he has eliminated this from consideration.
Killing cabalist: If this is true then based on what he said means that the cabal can’t kill again tonight since he would still be alive. Great avatar by the way.
Wolf: story would be a logical choice because of his reputation. And if there was ever going to be a bus then what better choice could there be suspecting that an investigative role is eventually going after him eventually. Makes sense if he has a scum role that investigates as town.
Vamp: See above.
I am still leaving my vote where it is, just because of my prickly nature. I think we have a red and black roulette role on the board. Low risk, low pay off. I’d be willing to go a little riskier for a little better pay off.
However, I do understand some of the conservatism. If this was a 50/50 chance then I understand the conservative play. But as a townie with a 25/75 chance I am going to take some chances on catching favorable runners.
I’m back from my July 4th Holiday, and I’ve handled myself the best I could in my other game, so I guess I’ve just got this game left to devote to. But not really surprised northing’s really been going on.
That said, I am curious about your unvoting of Peds, Peeker.
What do you hope to accomplish by your One off on the lurker. I’ve noted your stance, and it’s all cool. I get it. You believe **Peds **is guilty, but you don’t want to leave a Vote for him. Instead you’re one offing.
Now uh… WHY are you one offing? What’s the point? Why not just state your suspicions for Cog, (Put it in big orange letters as an homage to **Idle Thoughts **if you wish) and then vote for Peds?
Because, right now, I don’t see a sensible reason for what you’re doing. Well, that’s not true. I do see one. It’s a worrisome one, because that’s the sort of behavior that our ever so dear and clever **Storyteller **tried to do during My Batman Game and failed…
So now I ask of you- WHY are you not voting for Peds- do you know something we don’t? I’ll keep it in my records that you’re suspicious of the lurker and all that- but if there is some OTHER reason that you don’t want your final vote on **Peds **by the end of the Day- well, I’m kinda curious to know about it sooner rather than later. Especially if something’s about to go down- there’s already been an odd list posted up by our delightful hangee… and uh, I’m starting to wonder about these sorts of things, Peeker.
So why are you one offing on a Lurker? Do you really think he’s gonna come in and post, and then you’ll go back to voting for **Peds? **Or are you just hoping for the opposite?
I much prefer to just call people on stuff when I see it and make them explain.
