Mafia: Evil Dead - DAY/NIGHT THREE

[Total_Lost]

@Almost_Human

So you’re saying Thing fish investigated sucessfully, found scum and didn’t vote or interact with the person he investigated?

I got a lot of Thing Fish rereading to do now - if I remember correctly he posted quite a lot!

In the Day/Night One he made 23 posts and the last one pretty much summes it up:

@Thing_Fish

Actually, I wouldn’t call Hawk’s case against NAF strong. It basically boils down to that** NAF** considered voting for either of two people, and chose the one who is still unconfirmed over the one who is known scum. I don’t see Hawk’s long posts above as being scummy, but they are pretty much what Cookies predicted they would be: putting people who voted for macey mostly into the pro-Town pile, those who didn’t into the neutral or pro-scum pile, and those who argued against it into the scum pile, with a few exceptions that seem very subjective.

It does seem like amrussell argued much more forcefully than Cookies did against the macey lynch, so I’m mildly curious why Hawk voted for Cookies. But he did say he would be happy to vote for** amrussell**, so I don’t see it as being suspicious.

I don’t know that any of the above was very helpful…I just felt like writing a post in this game that didn’t mention Pleonast.

He voted for Pleo and made a real efford in building that case rock-solid.

I’m not sure who excatly to interpret “Did you interact directly with whoever you investigate (meaning: did you quote him/her in one of your answers and/or vote and/or challenge him/her”. Thing Fish did ask for people to state their case against him clearly - but I don’t think we can get anymore info at this point from his posts.

He does talk about Diggitcamara, JSexton, Chuc, Rapier42, me, Speciel Ed, Macey, Pede, Hawk, Cookie, NAF and amrussell - but talking just isn’t "interact directly IMO - so a null tell for now