Okay. I went back and looked through all the posts I could find where I leveled accusations or otherwise built my case against Biotop. I crossed out or left out anything that has been completely invalidated by yesterday’s lynch and revealed information. I highlighted in dark red anything which I feel is still relevant or otherwise applicable.
What I see is that the majority of what I wrote still applies today, and that’s before adding in certain new facts which I will be going over soonish.
I’ve put each post in its own spoiler to hopefully keep things neat.
[spoiler]I currently think Biotop is the mafia hidden among the vanilla townies.
He’s been pinging me for a little while now. He was talking earlier about how town had the game locked up, which at the time struck me as… overly optimistic. But this really bugged me:
For about the first time, I’m going to throw down some meta analysis. Biotop was a wolf in the first (and only) game of Mafia I’ve run here, and I was very entertained watching him in the wolf thread. I was entertained because Biotop is a thinker. He thinks through everything - hypotheticals, convoluted plans, you name it. Even high-risk stuff like one scum trying to get the only other remaining scum lynched. He thinks. He considers.
We’ve hashed to death why the cult might be dangerous to town in certain situations. Biotop’s ‘confusion’ strikes me as very much not genuine Biotop. Not even a little bit. [del]And if the wolves had already been planning this cultist gambit, this is the kind of thing that would have been on his mind. I think this comment is a slip. A big one. “They don’t have to side with anyone. They just need to live.”
Well, now they have to do both. Coincidental, huh?[/del]
I called him out for the wording on this earlier, but I don’t like anything about it. Biotop knew that Texcat wouldn’t flip town. He voted her very early in the day, but Texcat was the presumptive lynch regardless.
I’ve taken some preliminary looks back at the voting record at Biotop appears to have placed his votes in a manner that you’d expect for a [scum]. He was rarely clumped up with them and never mirrored a [scum’s] vote.*
There’s more to go over, but we’re just about at EoD. I’ll keep looking later.
*I for some reason typoed this to wolf even though all the wolves were dead at that point.[/spoiler]
[spoiler]
Nope. That’s not at all what I said. What I said is that I know you to be a clever and thoughtful player who thinks through many different scenarios and outcomes for any given situation. That’s why I don’t buy your confusion. Raventhief? I buy his confusion. He’s been screaming “clueless newbie” all game long (raventhief, if you’re the hidden mafioso then well done).
See below for another example of that:
:dubious:
If you are actually town, you’re proposing an incredibly anti-town scheme. You’re suggesting that we should lose three townies toDay.
With your scheme, the patsy dies, townie Biotop dies, and mafia kill a confirmed non-scum (Klutz or a cultist) with their kill. That’s an utterly terrible day.[/spoiler]
[spoiler]Okay. The first thing I want to bring up is some claim stuff.
By the time Texcat posted D11#18, mafia knew who the patsy was. Biotop was the last player to claim VT, and he did that in D11#13. At that point, the remaining unclaimed vanilla players were [texcat/scathach/hawkeyeop], two of whom are scum.
If Biotop is the hidden scum, then mafia knew who the patsy was all the way back D9#202 when raventhief claimed VT.
So Texcat was pushing for the patsy to remain silent even after she knew the patsy’s identity.
Leaving that bit aside, we can see that Texcat was vociferously opposed to a patsy claim. The simplest reason for this is because the patsy claiming would have helped town by providing information. The more speculative reason is because they figured that they could make use of the (by now obviously secretive) patsy is some way in the future.
Who urged the patsy to claim?
Raventhief and Plumpudding.
Who joined Texcat in urging the patsy to remain silent?
Biotop [del]and Hawkeyeop.[/del]
Biotop even went so far as to say that the win was wrapped up but that more claims might throw it to scum.
Biotop put hawkeyeop on his townie shortlist in D10#78.
[del]Hawkeye “me too’d” a Texcat post in D9#40.[/del]
Biotop suddenly reversed his very firmly stated position, said the patsy should reveal, [del]and removed himself from the patsy pool very shortly before hawkeye made his claim.[/del]
Biotop [del]and Hawkeyeop were the only two players who [/del]seemed to have the same agenda as Texcat. They are the scum.
One more post incoming. [/spoiler]
[spoiler]
Extraordinarily reductive summary of my posts toDay. Plumpudding is right when he says you’re handwaving.
I said it in the post where I voted hawkeye, but it bears repeating.
People definitely get busy. But this is also the #1 excuse for a bucket of scummy behaviors. Skimming? My life is busy. Not posting? My life is busy. Difference in play style? Failure to deliver promised analysis? My life is busy.
I’m not accusing you of every one of those. My point is that these are all scum behaviors, and scum consistently fall back to the real-life defense because it can’t be contradicted. So the only response to that can be “I’m sorry your life is busy and I believe you (and I do, and it’s even more reasonable in a game that’s lasted this long), but that’s not actually a defense.”
It’s a policy thing, like lynching liars. You have to be uniform because otherwise you open massive doors for scum to waltz through. [/spoiler]
[spoiler]
What on earth? Of course I’ve thought about the ‘alternative.’
I expect Scathach to flip patsy. I have spent the entire day building on the premise that Scathach will flip patsy. Your ‘alternative’ has been my primary focus all damned day. Even if I’ve been lying, the idea that I somehow haven’t even thought about a scenario with a patsy-Scathach is a laughable, desperate-looking smudge.
If Scathach flips scum, I will be (quite pleasantly) surprised and then I will go back and decide whether I think my case against you is still the best one on the table.
At this time, though, with the hammer activated, I refuse to openly speculate on what mafia might choose to do because I do not know whether day orders have been locked in. They do not need to know what I perceive the highest-value moves to be.
Sorry. [/spoiler]
[spoiler]
Yeah, exactly. You’re speculating on something that is pure, crystalline WIFOM.
I’ve thought about it, but not too much because I don’t speculate about WIFOM unless I think it’s going to get me somewhere. What value is there in trying to figure out who mafia is going to daykill? We have no protective roles. We have no watcher.
I’ve also said before that I’m trying to antagonize Koldanar less, since he still has the power to tilt things away from us if Scathach is in fact the patsy.
Shame on me for not analyzing even more than I already have been. I must be scum. I’m just not doing enough work here. You caught my tell!
-next post, same thought-
I never finished this thought. Too much jumping around.
What value is there in trying to figure out who mafia is going to daykill now that the day is over? Especially since we have no idea whether the hammer ended their order window? Plumpudding is right - this feels like a “gotcha” question. It’s already a “gotcha” premise, and one that I already addressed when you accused me of not even considering the possibility that Scathach is the patsy.
Which, again, is utterly ludicrous. I have done nothing today but that. [/spoiler]