Mafia Reunion Day 5

[bufftabby]

@Biotop

Okay class, here is my report on bufftabby:

As usual, I did not do my homework.

@Biotop

The second thing I note is that bufftabby completely drops the case against **Johnny Bravo **on Day 2, never to return. Yes there is new information, new deaths and the Brewha lie to contemplate after Day 1. But it seems odd this case is not ever followed up on again.

I’m not sure what new ground there was to cover there? I feel like all you can do with something like that, if no one else finds it suspicious, is note it and keep on eye on the player.

@Biotop

The vote on Diggit makes sense in one way, but the whole posting of the current vote count in #535 to make sure we understand why pings me. Yes 14 votes insures a lynch, but wouldn’t a vote for Boozahol, who was farther behind at the time, be more likely to lead to a double lynch? If she was wolf, however, then she would probably vote for Diggit to protect Boozahol. She had never expressed an opinion on **Diggit ** before and now votes him for “maximum information.” Why not vote for Boozahol to bring the votes closer and see what happens for “maximum information?” I’d like more of an explanation from **bufftabby **on her vote here.

To clarify, I wasn’t saying Diggit would yield maximum information, rather that the double lynch would. I voted Diggit specifically bc he had 13 votes at the time and 14 was the threshold for a double lynch.