Johnny_Bravo:
I would find him more credible if he claimed cultist, yes. But again, he’s ignoring the votes on him. He’s ignoring requests for more information. He’s ignoring direct questions. All of that is scummy.
No just scummy, suicidal.
Not sure if you’re referring to me, I was supporting your question to Inner if he was a cultist - encouraging a claim and a number.
Johnny_Bravo:
That’s not unusual.
Well done!
Zeriel:
Plumpudding , you may have voted for **TexCat **starting on Day Two, but you haven’t voted for her again even in passing until yesterday. Which also kinda makes **Hoopy’s **comment weird, too, since you and he were the only voters on **TexCat **yesterday.
What do you see, seeding a case, distancing, or something else?
Lightfoot, I’m guessing you’ll not acknowledge my comments on you unless they come accompanied with a vote? Let me finish that WoW…
Mahaloth:
**Day 6 Vote Count
Innerstickler(4) - Texcat(55), johnnybravo(81), hookerchemical(84), raventhief(89)
Texcat(3) - Hoopy(24), plumpudding(31), guiri(94)
Khameleon(1) - snfaulkner(6),
Johnnybravo(1) - innerstickler(32)
Totallost(1) - Guiri(40)
Zeriel(1) - Biotop(65)**
I unvoted Total
To add:
Posting but not voting yet (8): Captain Klutz, ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies, LightFoot, Khameleon, Koldanar, Scathach, sinjin, Zeriel
Not even posting (11): bufftabby, crys, Cygnus, Ender, Hal, hawkeyeop, Lakai, MHaye, Nanook, Nesta, Total
You guess wrong. I will give you more attention when I am off work. ( off to find the post…)
GuiriEnEspana:
I unvoted Total
To add:
Posting but not voting yet (8): Captain Klutz, ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies, LightFoot, Khameleon, Koldanar, Scathach, sinjin, Zeriel
Not even posting (11): bufftabby, crys, Cygnus, Ender, Hal, hawkeyeop, Lakai, MHaye, Nanook, Nesta, Total
That Not Even Posted list is depressing.
Johnny_Bravo:
You know, reading back over the exchange did give me this:
That makes me feel even better about my vote.
Do you think sachertorte might have investigated them, even tho he told us he wasn’t investigating anyone?
** Guiri **[spoiler]
~snip~
YesterDay I noticed Lightfoot was playing this game, despite being among the top posters every Day, she’d gone under my radar and I did not have any sort of read on her, I started a WoW and see that we did interact, but haven’t made it past D1, will try again over the weekend. #7 question about subs
#55 points Colby to roles doc, disregarding N0 leans
#61 To Johnny Bravo, re:Meeko about being held accountable for D1 votes
#71 Only scum make informed D1 votes
#74 Helps Thing Fish quote
#76 To Meeko, clarifies response
#80 Joke
#135 Dislikes ToeJam’s “Gead” reference in the vote count
#137 Not so much with context
#251 Corrects Koldanar’s suspicion about multiple Wizards
#304 Links to roles doc
#305 too late (to link)
#310 Thoughts on Colby, often is misinterpreted, should have read roles, questions votes on him
#483 To Angel, should read roles
#485 To Biotop, why would Angel say she’d not read the roles?
#521 To Pleo, has not yet answered a question
#524 Asks Angel for thoughts on issues
#750 Did not know Angel was Archangel
#776 Suspects and misvotes Lakai, mainly for his case on Colby
#779 Notes Lakai has since unvoted, considers response rehearsed
#782 Agrees with jsgoddess re: Scathach’s smudge
#800 OOG
#801 To Lakai, response time was slow
#802 To Scathach, asks why voting TexCat
#803 explains “rehearsed” to bufftabby
#805 To ThingFish, is not a lurker, is in ICU
#807 lists one post wonders
#810 considers Red & Inner could be together based on vote, suspects lurkers may be avoiding attention
#817 Gives SunnyDaze advice about votes, and unvotes
#830 To Prof.P, his list of low voters does not include leans or opinions
#836 To Normal, there are more than 12 scum
#845 To Lakai, only two posts were suspicious
#850 To Chronos, protecting Septimus could cause a doc to die, suspects Total Lost was digging for a claim to shoot straight, doesn’t agree with Chronos’ 3rd party claiming D1
#852 Asks Prof.P why uncomfortable (posting link to other game)
#857 To Nanook, agrees EMT is a good scum claim, but also a smudge on Septimus
#864 Re: Patsy claim, any suggestion should be followed up on
#868 To mods, vote not counted
#877 To Nanook, more about fake-claiming EMT
#882 To Plump, more about Patsy
#883 fixes vote
#897 To Pleo, disagrees that scum wouldn’t jump on a mis-post
#909 To Prof.P, needs to consider more than count, should vote scummiest
#910 neta
#923 To Sunny, re: parking a vote
#934 unvotes are not officially recorded
#938 Comments on Suburban’s vote parking
#942 To Chronos, votes and unvotes are on the record but not in official count
#943 Comments on Chronos’ post (don’t lynch claimed town power, never lie, claim not 3rd party)
#949 Cannot see a downside to claiming not 3rd party
#1010 Colby is being sarcastic, discouraged
#1012 Discusses end day vote shenanigans
#1016 To septimus, who asks about Thing Fish’s case on Pleo, hinges on when Pleo got PM and what he knew at the time
#1017 To me, explained what rehearsed meant
#1019 Thanks septimus for list of votes & unvotes
#1020 Agrees with septimus that Angel doesn’t seem town
#1021 To me, comments on color in defense of Colby’s comments
#1023 To Lakai, explains how I tend to ask questions
#1024 To Bill, agrees that chronos might be 3rd party with a mission
#1032 To Suburban, Chronos hasn’t indicated suspicion of non-claimaints
#1035 To Plump, still wonders about the disclaimer before posting links
#1037 To Normal, agrees that Suburban has misstated the cases on the top 3, to Suburban, asks to comment on #938
#1038 neta re spelling lakai
#1060 To Surburban, accepts explanation to #1032
#1063 Surprised no-one else commented on his #938
#1064 To Lakai, questions if he thought through the vote on Colby
#1067 To Plump, more about the disclaimer
#1072 Would double down on Lakai based on recent post
5th vote on Lakai, lots of chatter considering ICU, interactions with quite a few players, maybe more JAQing or stirring than hunting, too early to tell.
[/spoiler]
Here is your WoW-p1 were there questions in it? Yes I was very stressed in ICU why matters it?
And JAQing ( Just Asking Questions?)
I will go a searching for other unanswered questions when I arrive at the homestead
Hi people - gonna try to come up with something coherent and useful here…
First off, farewell to Paul and Meeko - Paul was being very helpful, so it’s rough to lose that. Meeko, I never really figured out what was going on there.
I’ve been following the posts over the week - I can typically read during the day at work in short bursts, but it’s tough to really think about things and compose a reply.
I saw the initial case against Khameleon, but didn’t really see much scummy there myself. I think his reply to the points made against him are pretty reasonable.
I’m getting a more scumlike vibe from Inner Stickler - though the tip he posted about easy, uncontested votes is pretty useful info - it makes sense that if the end of day is very quiet, both scum factions are OK with the lynch. I think Johnny B makes a good case in his posts during the day. On the flip side, I don’t really see Inner’s case against Johnny.
No opinion on Texcat, so I’ll have to do some further reading and see if that case makes any sense to me.
For now, I’ll
Vote Inner Stickler
I think I’ll have some time tomorrow to read up on Texcat and a couple other people, and see if I can come up with some new suspects.
I don’t know about the first part, but I don’t believe for a moment that he wasn’t investigating.
quote from** Guiri ** post D5:429=
Fair enough, but to know who we’re up against, you wouldn’t need to list the town roles, unless you have a cunning plan on how they can be used. It pings.
I thought answered this,
but.
knowing what we are against, and what we have for defense ( power wise) was to benefit Town etal. Some players may not have been keeping track. I don’t understand your issue with this?
How am I not responding to you?
Yeah, that was my take on it when never responded to my question on why he wasn’t investigating.
I mean the general culture that’s developed around the cultists this game - that anybody who doesn’t drop a case against a potential cultist is being scummy. It provides way too much smoke screen for the actual scum.
bolding mine
Did you mean doesn’t, or does?
GuiriEnEspana:
I unvoted Total
To add:
Posting but not voting yet (8): Captain Klutz, ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies, LightFoot, Khameleon, Koldanar, Scathach, sinjin, Zeriel
Not even posting (11): bufftabby, crys, Cygnus, Ender, Hal, hawkeyeop, Lakai, MHaye, Nanook, Nesta, Total
I did advise that I wouldn’t be around for a few days due to vacation. But rejoice, for I have returned.
Doesn’t. As in anybody who doesn’t back away from somebody who might be a cultist.
Yay! Now what to do about the other 10…
But what about also because it doesn’t make sense in this game, to worry specifically about Night-posting? Normally I would agree, I prefer to play it close to the best at Night, but when there’s scum kills on both sides of the coin, why bother refraining?
And this looks like an easy OMGUS vote.
bufftabby:
Normally I would agree, I prefer to play it close to the best at Night, but when there’s scum kills on both sides of the coin, why bother refraining?
They’re separate scum teams. Shutting up at night removes information from the team which puts in its orders at night.
But, like I said, it’s moot.
Hal posted something early in the game, asking the mods about…whether scum could communicate on their own board, I think…that pinged me as trying too hard for a derpclear, but he hasn’t given us much to go on since then. I will have to find that once I’m caught up.
I see you meant drop as and discontinue, not as in make. (I was unsure at the time)