**WOW on Scathach **
Day 1
21 Goodby Dante
22 Didn’t read Night 0
35 Criticises Biotop for being too “helpful townie”
39 Asks Biotop if there is anything worthwhile in Night 0
208 Comments on Meeko’s “Was Dante the Patsy?”
225 Patsy as a name. Also “The only reason I can see for the Patsy to claim unprompted is so investigators don’t waste their powers targetting them. Is there another advantage I’m missing?”
476 “I thought we’d already threshed out the “scum wouldn’t do that” issue.”
758 Votes TexCat for starting the Colby wagon “But tbh that post was classic colby and she’s played with him often enough to know that.”
762 Replies to TexCat
763 Minor reaction to septimus’s EMT claim
766 Another reply to TexCat, clarifying the “doubling down”
771 Reply to jsgoddess, about TexCat and doubling down
774 More clarification to to jsgoddess
781 oog
785 More clarification, this time to LightFoot
793 Another reply to TexCat
Comment:
Criticism of Biotop was a bit unfair. Her TexCat vote results in lots of discussion.
Day 2
26 Comment on Colby
160 Omnibus post:
- comment on win stealers
- FOS jsgoddess
- response to Pleonast over the criticism of Biotop
- comment on third parties
- still suspicious of Texcat, also the Colby voters
167, 168 gets clarification on win stealers
229 Comment on the Brewha switch plan
233 Points out problems with the Brewha switch plan
257 Another comment on the Brewha switch plan
261 Another comment on the Brewha switch plan
324 Comment on the low participation and the consequent difficulty of getting a second lynch
329 oog
337 oog
342 Requests a player list from the moderators
355 Seeks mod confirmation of Klutz’s switch questions
359 Comment on the mod’s reply
796 I’ll be away
959 Votes Chrys, is pro the double lynch. “I’m not a proponent of lynch all liars particularly”
Comment
Is heavily against the Brewha switch plan.
I am curious about the “I’m not a proponent of lynch all liars particularly”. This looks a bit strange as lies are rarely tolerated.
Day 3
143 is on holidays
Has some problems with the cultists
Thinks ToeJam is being overly defensive. Votes ToeJam (but improperly formatted)
160 Replies to LightFoot, clarifying the previous post
Comment
Little activity toDay (on holiday). She did in fact vote, although it was not officially counted.
Day 4
120 omnibus post
- response to Lakai, trying to understand her argument
- response to HalBriston about the 2 people who voted IdleThoughts after he posted that screenshot
- agrees that lynching the cultists doesn’t provide any information, I still remain pro double lynch
- response to TexCat, who points out that (Non-Hostile) appears as part of Chrys’s alignment
- asks Chrys why she did not confirm the other claimed cultist
177 Reply to Guiri, who asked about her holiday and whether she had caught up.
Comment
Another low activity Day, with no vote. Possibly interesting that both her posts include replies to mafiates
Day 5
491 Apologises for her absence
494 Wants to revisit Chrys as sachertorte’s reveal did not indicate win-stealing or non-winstealing
Comment
Eve less activity toDay, again with no vote.
Day 6
7 Asks if there is any possible reason for the cultists not to mass claim and then confirm each other
9 Reply to snfaulkner about the cultists
92 Responds to Guiri and Koldanar about her absence and her focus on the cult
Also asks about the case on TexCat
95 Response to JohnnyBravo, about his case on InnerStickler. “I read it, but nothing really leaped out at me tbh”
96 Brewha gender clarification
Comment
Back from holiday, but still nothing of substance. Again no vote
Day 7
206 Thinks a traditional SK role seems absurd in this setup. “But then I think the LUTHA roles seem to have too easy a wincon so what do I know.”
Doubts that Cookies is a bomb, votes Cookies
207 Question to LightFoot: “What makes you pro a LUTHA claim but not mason + patsy?”
208 Question to Koldanar, asking if he also had a confirm power
214 Response to LightFoot: “Just curious since people seem to be very willing to accept LUTHA as claimed. If so then a full LUTHA/mason/patsy claim should be a good thing. I’m not particularly willing to accept LUTHA but I’m obviously in the minority.”
215 Asks Koldanar why he is trying to find scum rather than protecting his lutha teammates
226 Asks everyone to comment on her question to Koldenar
229 Again, has doubts about Koldanar’s motivations
231 Reply to snfaulkner, who asked why it bothered Scathach that Koldanar was trying to find scum.
232 “I’m super dubious of Koldanar’s claim”
234 Another reply to snfaulkner, still doubting Koldanar’s motivations
281 Pointed out that (Non-hostile) was in lutha’s reported alignment, but not in their death reveal. Cookies reveal should be interesting
Comment
This was the Day of Cookies runaway wagon, so the lynch was never in question.
Scathach spent the Day concerned over lutha.
Day 8
13 Votes Koldanar, because “his play doesn’t make sense as a cultist”
14 Comments in the colour of HookerChemical’s death reveal, that it sounds like it’s coming from GladOS aka Cookies
43 Decides that HookerChemical was not a residual Cookies kill
118 “But we seem to be inching closer to the point where with LUTHA and mason claims we can eliminate the scum pool for hiding in. I don’t see any point in hiding information now.”
146 Again, that HookerChemical was not a residual Cookies kill
147 Says that she is voting for Koldanar because “I think he’s straight up lying about his role.”
Comment
Still concerned almost exclusively with lutha.
Day 9
16 Asks JohnnyBravo why the mass claim is the decision of the remaining power roles
124 Still didn’t really believe that Koldanar was lutha. But without a counterclaim, have to believe he’s lutha
125 “I’m also surprised Lightfoot was against the mass claim”
Also, does not agree with JohnnyBravo’s case on Lightfoot
129 Votes Bufftabby following Klutz’s case
Comment
Scathach appears to be in favour of the mass claim
Day 10
13 Feels stupd because she was set to vote for LightFoot toDay
22 “The patsy would be an idiot to claim right now. The only power left is the kill if lynched.”
111 Absent due to St Patrick’s Day
112 oog
114 oog
117 oog
120 oog
122 oog
130 Votes Zeriel
Comment
The only thing of note is the comment about the Patsy not claiming now
Overall a scum lean. Of particular interest:
Day 2
She is heavily against the Brewha switch plan.
The “I’m not a proponent of lynch all liars particularly” is very strange as lies are rarely tolerated. Mafia did want to save Brewha, so this looks particularly bad.
Day 9, she appeared to be in favour of the mass claim, although she didn’t actually say that:
Day 10, definitely against claiming:
Throughout she has been more concerned with lutha than finding scum.