I apologize to everyone in advance for continuing this nonsense with Idle, but I just can’t let him get away with it.
[QUOTE=Idle Thoughts]
Sorry, I wouldn’t call that a summary. I’d call that a twisted summary. But that’s no surprise coming from someone I find suspicious myself.
[/QUOTE]
Twisted, eh? Let’s break it down, shall we (color coded for convenience):
[QUOTE=Idle Thoughts, as a question to Pleo]
What I mean on this one though (for two) is, is there a time limit on speaking or resurrecting?
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=me, summarizing the above]
Idle: Do I have the ability to do A and B?
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Pleonast (supposedly), responding to Idle]
There is no time limit on how long dead the speak-target has been.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=me, summarizing the above]
Pleo: You have the ability to do A.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Idle Thoughts]
But as you can see, I planly ask in the second one “Resurrection” too, even going as far as to say “because I think it’d be cool to bring back long dead roles”. And since he didn’t say otherwise, I assumed the no-time limit accounts for all.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=me, summarizing the above]
Idle: Oh good, I have the ability to do A and B!
[/QUOTE]
Feel free to point out the twisting. Be specific.
[QUOTE=Idle Thoughts]
If you really want to split hairs, a more apt summary would be:
Person A: Can I do this and this and this and this?
Person B: You can do the first. As for the rest, I’m not saying no…
..with the second part of Person B’s sentence not actually said but implied since it was VERY OBVIOUS and PLAINLY STATED that Person A asked the question. Since the question appeared to be ignored or not said otherwise, again, I do not see how impossible it is to assume “well, I wasn’t corrected, so it must apply too”.
[/QUOTE]
…Except that the Rules as posted and PM’ed to you VERY OBVIOUSLY and PLAINLY STATE otherwise. Keep digging, Idle, it’s very entertaining.
[QUOTE=Idle Thoughts]
I think you just looking for a reason to lynch me in the Day.
[/QUOTE]
Wrong again.
[QUOTE=Me, earlier toDay]
And I’m not going to vote for you now because we’ve got bigger and better fish to fry.
[/Quote]
[QUOTE=Idle Thoughts]
Because I have already cleared it up with him early yesterday and I was wrong in that assumption (as Dio and Hockey pointed out way before you).
[/QUOTE]
It’s good to see you finally clearly admit that you were wrong. I assume when you say you “cleared it up early yesterday” you mean your post 1204 at 7pm, where you grudgingly admit that “in a way” it was a mistake, but one that was “not wholely” your fault.
And btw, **Diomedes **only beat me to it by 16 minutes, not “way before” me, and **Hockey **was after me. So you were wrong about that, too.