I’m not offended at all.
However, I also do not believe a single word.
“I telephoned my wife and explained the situation to her, and she said she certainly had no problem with it…”
hahahahahahahahahaha!!!
OK folks, show of hands…who’s making that phone call home?
Nice fantasy though.
Mod note
Not pickin’ on Khadaji here; just using the most succint post to quote.
For clarification on TMI threads, no, we ain’t the Penthouse forum. True, Cecil, the Master his own self, hasn’t flinched from tackling questions about sex, excretions, kinks, etc. along with weighty stuff about science, history, etc. Fortunately, the Teeming Millions, while not always “polite company” (HA!), do tend to have broad interests that stretch beyond sex, excretions, kinks, etc.
So it’s a question of balance. Khadji’s dead right that this runs in cycles, much like “Ask the”, who’s your fave, etc. threads. Some are okay; too many become annoying and plain overkill. TMI threads can rapidly morph into gross-out/shock contests. Fad thread of the month: top this, sucker! When it starts swamping the board, we start shutting threads down.
We ain’t Penthouse Forum, Springer In Print, or Luv Connection. Elements? Fine. Glut? Nope.
Veb
Ah, the TMI sex thread: a sure sign that spring has arrived.
Sorry about the reaction to your thread, dude. I didn’t expect this much of a reaction, but that’s one reason I didn’t want it in mine. Not that I see anything wrong with it. It’s your life; live it the way you think is right. 
Personally, I don’t agree with your (or your wife’s) definition of what constitutes sex. I think there’s a reason why it’s called “oral sex”. But, if it works for you, and it sure seems to, it sure doesn’t hurt me, any.
Just curious; does it work both ways? Is your wife free to blow other guys? Has she? Maybe we can get the thread back on topic…sort of.
On preview, I see we’ve had a visit from TVeblen, but I can’t tell if the thread has been closed, or not. It’s not clear whether TV decided we’ve hit the glut point, or not. I guess I’ll find out when I submit. I don’t know how else to tell. (Still kinda new, around here.)
My reactions to the OP: :eek: , followed by…“I’m under 18, am I allowed to read this?”
IMO, oral sex is kinda nasty. I just don’t get the concept of a guy sticking his tongue in there. :dubious: But that’s great taht you’re that…um…open? close? with both your wife and your friends. If all parties involved are totally cool with it, go ahead.
I’m just a little confused… since the header said TMI and clearly indicated that this thread was going to be somewhat sexual in nature, why do some people read the thread and then get offended? If you started reading the OP and realize it’s not a topic with which you are comfortable, why not just hit the ‘Back’ button on the browser and stop reading the message? No one is forced to read any threads that make them uncomfortable. Just my opinion.
Also, to the comment ‘Would someone think about the children’, if the children weren’t present, and all of the adults were comfortable with what happened (and won’t be turning into any kind of head case (no pun intended) over what happened and if the marriage remains intact (and maybe happier), how will children be harmed?
I guess not.
I am absolutely speechless, I can’t believe it…
It took you 4 minutes to bring a woman to orgasm with oral sex?!?!
Was she asleep, and it took 3 minutes to wake her up?
Hi, Davebear, and sorry for any confusion. This one’s still open–for the moment. I just won’t tolerate much more, e.g. “TMI: molesting corpses/housepets”, “TMI: what’s your favorite orifice?”, “TMI: cum while popping zits?”, etc.
We ain’t usenet.
Veb
That was pepperlandgirl, and I think she was being sarcastic, judging by her later comment to Khadaji. My initial reaction to her first reply was “What children?”. Then I saw her comment about no one forcing anyone to read the thread. Whoosh!
There ain’t much to it. The concept, that is. Guys do it because women dig it. If being eaten out felt like someone kissing your elbow, there would be a lot less people going down on their lady friends.
How would you feel, DirkGntly, if you were in your friend’s shoes. You’ve tried for years to get your wife off by going down on her and have been grossly unsuccessful. Suddenly your best friend comes over and within minutes, has her talking with God.
The male animal is naturally competitive. I can’t imagine your friendship surviving this this kind of behavior…let alone your marriage. I’m not being morally judgemental, here. I’m just saying that in my circles, this kind of “friendship” doesn’t exist. YMMV.
Bahahaha! 
I’ve heard of “minute men”, but I didn’t know there was a “women’s auxiliary”. 
Are you seriously saying you reach orgasm in under a minute, from oral sex? I guess that would be handy, at times, but wouldn’t you rather enjoy it a while? I mean, even if you’re multi-orgasmic, how many in a row can you handle without taking a break? Heck, that isn’t enough time for me to enjoy it, never mind any woman I’ve ever been with.
Lesbians do it because they like to do it. I, for example, could eat pussy all day, easily.
Sorry about the hijack, but I just couldn’t let this go.
Hi, Veb! Thanks for the clarification.
And…ewwwww. Well, I like the “favorite orifice” one. It made me chuckle. I’m partial to belly buttons, myself. Do they count? But, the others…ewwwwww. Even I won’t go there. There are some things I just don’t want to know.
Would you be willing to comment on his technique, and get this thread truly back on topic? I would say you would qualify as an “expert witness”.
Oh, and the one minute orgasm thing…any comments on that?
I only come to the SDMB to read the articles…I swear…
LOL! Not me. I come here because of all the hot babes, like **!^@#disconnect
Thanks, Davebear, for trying to get this back on topic. I didn’t really open this up for social comment on my life or choices, as you know. It was a response to your thread and a comment made there, and I requested, after description of the “technique,” for input from the women on what they thought. There was/is a GREAT DEAL MORE DETAIL about the social interaction that I did not address, because it was peripheral to the point of the OP. I included the TMI warning because I didn’t want people “accidentally” wandering into the thread. It might be a bit “over the top” but this thread was intended to be informational in nature regarding cunnilingus, as described by me, and then commented on by the readers at large. (Is that trolling, or polling? I’m a bit confused on that point - someone can point me to a thread on trolling later - let’s not hijack this thread further than it has been.)
To answer a few questions directly, and then maybe get things back on track:
My wife and I both view oral sex as non-emotionally involved. For some this is not possible, for us it is. Davebear, if my wife really wanted to do that for a guy, I guess I would be okay with it, because I’m not emotionally involved with that particular act. Coitus, or intercourse, I might have a problem with, and don’t intend to go there.
Ruby, my friend is perfectly fine with it. This happened 3 weeks ago, and I’ve personally known the guy since junior high. His attitude is that he wouldn’t want to keep anything pleasurable from his wife that wasn’t harmful. Apparently this qualified. We’re all of us still getting along great.
Someone asked about telephoning my wife - first, she was out of town, so couldn’t be there, unfortunately. Secondly, yes, I really DID telephone her, but there is a LOT of detail and background that I did not get into as to WHY I felt comfortable in telephoning her about this particular thing.
Now that that is out of the way, does anyone else have anything to add along the lines of the intent of the OP?
Sorry, Davebear, that entire first paragraph was not really particularly aimed at you - on review that’s how it appears. Really, I was just thanking you for trying to get things back on track, and then commenting on my original intent to the rest of the readers…
sorry if there was any unintended confusion.