One logical disconnect between this ruling and the Constitution is that the Constitution says nothing about the “free exercise” of religion, which Amendment 1 says cannot be prohibited, depending on the ability to gather. And it certainly says nothing about the free exercise of religion depending on gathering in particular numbers.
If the New York prohibitions at issue prevented people from gathering online, for example, that might reasonably be tied with an unconstitutional ban on a free exercise of religion. But no such ban was instituted in New York.
I guess I need to go to the other thread----but this SCOTUS decision seems to me to be so wildly wrongly-decided, that it makes me feel Pit-y.